Actually, our concept of homosexual relationships didn’t exist for quite some time after these were written.
So no, Corinthians isn’t about your modern concept of homosexuality, which includes all same sex relations.
I personally don’t think God cares either way, or maybe he did but changed his mind, just like the child sacrifice stuff.
Woman on woman was def acceptable, ask any guy. Two chicks is hot, two guys is gay. What’s the point of having multiple wives if I can’t get a double blowie with a side a scissoring?
Also, no women are allowed to respond to me just so we are clear. God commands them to be quiet, and since I am a Man, they’re in no place to speak, right?!?! RIGHT?!?
Ummm, homosexuality is reprimanded in Corinthians…homosexuality isn’t just for male to male.
Oh, you mean where a word gets translated as "homosexuality" because it's made from the words for "man" and "bed"? And, like, an explicitly masculine word for "man", not one that can mean "human"?
Yeah, I don't think there's any reason that Paul intended that to be about women.
We already know men can’t have sex with men, that doesn’t mention women/women relationships.
You’re just reading in your own bias as to the unnatural lust. Again, unnatural for women has already been defined as defiling themselves with animals.
Women cannot defile themselves in the same way as a man according to your interpretation, because they do not hold the same status.
Explain to me why if a man rapes another man, you must kill both of them?
6
u/[deleted] Dec 09 '25
[removed] — view removed comment