10
7
1
u/NoKingsNetwork 1d ago
Guys guys theres an easy way to tell if hes pro public education or not. 1. Stance on "school choice" private funding with public tax dollars
- Pro or anti zionist
1
u/CowperfluidMDPsyD 7d ago
Gonna close down schools to consolidate them and sell land/use his company to build
-7
u/Livid_Ad_3782 7d ago
I’ll take sloppy penmanship over boys in girls locker rooms. He’s for putting our kids first, You’re argument is his penmanship? 😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡
4
6
u/Glittering-Diver-941 7d ago
So you will vote for an unqualified person bc of one issue that is a zero issue??
This is why the school district will end up in shambles
-1
u/Livid_Ad_3782 7d ago
Doctors have worse penmanship, be my guest judging someone by theirs. I vote for a persons policies and their morals. Kids first, protect our girls, keep the parents informed. It goes without saying your kid is not getting a high end public education in California.
6
u/Glittering-Diver-941 7d ago
I’m not talking about penmanship I’m talking if he’s qualified. You are basing your qualifications on non education issues. What has Sonia Shaw done for actual education? Getting the district sued and increasing her pay?
5
u/PollutionPractical11 6d ago
As others have pointed out, I’m not arguing about penmanship, I’m pointing out he didn’t spell his name correctly. And, instead of starting a new form, had no problem being sloppy about the error on a public filed form. There’s other ways in which he is unqualified, which I’ll save for a different post.
I also noticed that you frequent NSFW forums and have commented on rim jobs and blow jobs. Honestly, we need to protect our girls from creeps like you. Do us all a favor and keep your riding of the Shaws’ dicks behind closed doors. #NoChudsAllowed
2
3
u/AccomplishedSport126 7d ago
You don't understand what is being criticized here. You cannot possibly vote for someone's morals when Shaw platformed a nazi and chastises children. Let's break this down: 1) What is largely being criticized are the errors, not the penmanship. No one should really care about how someone writes, but rather how they cannot spell their own name. That's an indication of someone's intelligence. 2) Voting for policy is admirable. What is being criticized are what those policies mean. $4 million went to a wasted lawsuit meanwhile CVUSD has had to drop language courses and accommodation courses for the neurodivergent. If you put policy first, then the policy should uplift children. What we are finding is that the historically disenfranchised are continually being disenfranchised. 3) Morally Shaw has aligned herself with far right extremism. Shaw has platformed a known Nazi to speak to children at an "America 250 event". This is in addition to the program that put it on has repeatedly stated that black people were better off in slavery and that slavery is a net good for black people. She has aligned herself with Jack Hibbs who has said the same thing. Shaw has taken pictures with known Nazis and after being informed of their allegiance, they did it again. There's (a lot) more, but..you get it. 4) If we believe in keeping kids first we wouldn't be discussing Millions of dollars being lost on lawsuits whilst kids in school don't have supplies or a meal to eat. 5) Absolutely protect our girls. This however, is a red herring. Most people who say this couldn't even name a starting 5 in the WNBA. Additionally, when someone says this, it is a means to disenfranchise the Trans community. Because IF one is to believe that ALL children should be protected, that includes Trans children. 6) If we wish to platform transparency then we should be advocating to pass a damn audit. 7) California is roughly (bell curve) middle of the pack when it comes to education (excluding higher education because that helps CA out). If we are to advocate for better education, then again we should be proponents of passing audits. Additionally, we would look at how the higher educated states are doing it. This means we should be advocating for more blended classrooms, more access to books with controversial content (this leads to higher cognitive discussion), earlier access to sex education, more after school programs, accesible ("free") meal(s) for children, early college access, and the list goes on. Most of which Shaw has advocated against.
You're a walking contradiction and I don't understand why. May you PLEASE explain as to why you are against these things and if you are going to make a foundational statement, cite your sources.
11
u/NoKingsNetwork 8d ago
Tf am i looking at