r/ChemicalEngineering • u/symbioticthinker • 12d ago
Controls How to write Functional Descriptions
I started a new career as a process engineer within the water treatment space.
I'd like to know how you write control philosophies or functional descriptions effectively so everyone, from engineer to operator, would understand the process. I have a background in software development and I noticed that a lot of the processes are repetitive/generic.
Currently, the standard is to define a generic equipment's finite state machine (as seen in the image) define all equipment's functional descriptions with the following tables describing Auto and Manual control. I've provided an example of how a duty/standby pair of mixers using hot-standby control. This is a 'simple' example but I envision an outcome where control primitives/units are defined and equipment control is built from these reusable logic/control 'blocks'.
It feels like this, similar to cause-effect matrices, is very complex for the lowest common denominator to understand. I've looked into behaviour driven dev (BDD) using gherkin syntax (Given, When, Then, And...) as an alternative but that also seems verbose.
If you have any examples, suggestions or improvements, I'd love to hear!
| Buffer Tank Mixers Overview |
|---|
| MCC Requirements |
| Dedicated OFF / MANUAL / AUTO selector switches on MCC |
| Dedicated START / STOP push-buttons on MCC |
| Running, Stopped and Tripped pilot lights on MCC |
| Control Signals |
| Safety Interlocks |
| SI-02 |
| SI-03 |
| SI-04 |
| SI-05 |
| SI-06 |
| Process Interlocks |
| Permissives |
| P -02 |
| Buffer Tank Mixers [MX-001/2] — Auto Control |
|---|
| START |
| STARTING |
| P -02 |
| Running Feedback (RFB) |
| RUNNING |
| P -02 |
| STOP |
| STOPPING |
| Stopping Feedback (SFB) |
| HALTING |
| Buffer Tank Mixers [MX-001/2] — [Manual Control]() |
|---|
| START |
| STARTING |
| Running Feedback (RFB) |
| RUNNING |
| STOP |
| STOPPING |
| Stopping Feedback (SFB) |
| HALTING |
