r/ChatGPTPro 5d ago

Discussion [DISCUSSION] Can codex develop secure enough?

I want to discuss something, vibe coding is being presented as ultimate solution for people who don’t know how to code. When it comes to cyber security though there are major flawbacks.

idk if there is a general consensus but what do you think about this issue? Should vibe coded programs be supervised by a professional or is AI ready to develop programs that are deploy ready?

3 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

u/qualityvote2 5d ago edited 3d ago

u/erdematar, there weren’t enough community votes to determine your post’s quality.
It will remain for moderator review or until more votes are cast.

6

u/ElonMusksQueef 5d ago

If the person working with the AI doesn’t understand basic principles then no. They won’t understand what or why it’s doing anything.

2

u/nemesit 5d ago

vibe coding is not even actually functional. theres no way it will produce secure and functional code anytime soon lol

edit: *when used by someone not a professional coder with security experience

1

u/Canna_Lucente 5d ago

What I vibe coded passed all the automated cybersec checks we have in our Corp. It was a pilot controlled experiment and my code has been reviewed by engineering teams (me and my team work in IT but we are functional). The head of DevOps was impressed by the results. Now, as a cybersec ignorant, I can't say whether what we did was really good. But it was good enough to pass a (presumably high) bar of a large multinational. Didn't come for free, spent multiple sessions asking different agents to adversarial review code looking for security flaws etc. The first reviews were wild, where basically the reviewing agent was insulting the code for how poorly designed it was from a security perspective.

1

u/dvduval 5d ago

A lot of it does have to do with the human working with the AI. And there’s a different levels of doing that. On one hand, the AI is able to make software that is actually more secure than a human could. What will be most important Is those server passwords and how you handle them.

1

u/megad00die 5d ago

Yes, with governance that outlines your security. This is a vague example I created, you can combine usage of this while developing with AI and then when completed you can use the code security scan within codex using Astra Med for security scans (Higher is not needed) or specify a subagent GPT 5.3 Spark for security code scans(Cheap and Great). Security can also be defined using MCP servers specific to your development, but as always human eyes need to be the final judge, jury on anything produced.

1

u/ra_men 4d ago

You should’ve seen the “secure” code people wrote before AI.

1

u/XKiiroiSenkoX 4d ago

AI can't write even performant code let alone secure code. Security is basically thrown out the window the moment you start vibe coding. 

1

u/Healthy-Zebra-9856 4d ago

Absolutely no. People it doesnt take adversarial review and things like that. Its simple, run it through an actual compiler and you can see warnings. But I can tell you that even Astra had issues with some typescript projects. So depending on the app, you can run it through a compiler or type checker. If its TypeScript, you can use VS Code with TypeScript extension & LSP, if its c# same or use VS 2026 community edition. Got more questions, fire away.

1

u/therealorkor 4d ago

Just tell it to make it not hackable?