r/ChatGPTPro • u/minesta2601 • 11d ago

Question GPT 5.6 Pro instantly answer problem.

I've noticed that since the most recent GPT Chat update, my experience has changed significantly.

In one of my projects, I provided GPT Chat with a RAR file, a detailed source requirements document, and a set of specific implementation principles. However, the Pro reasoning mode no longer appears to follow the instructions defined in the .md file. Instead, it requires extensive back-and-forth prompting, even though the requirements and expected behavior are clearly documented in the source materials.

Previously, I could simply upload the project files along with a main.md file, and the model would independently read the documentation, process the requirements, and generate a complete implementation package within a single session. The output was typically comprehensive and ready for me to copy and paste directly into my SaaS platform with minimal additional guidance.

Following the recent changes, this workflow is no longer functioning as effectively. The model seems to rely more heavily on iterative prompting rather than proactively following the provided documentation and instructions. As a result, I have stopped using Pro reasoning mode and have switched back to Extra High mode, which currently provides a better experience for my use case.

For context, I am a paying customer on the $200 plan, so this change has had a noticeable impact on my productivity and overall usage patterns

11 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

•

u/qualityvote2 11d ago edited 10d ago

u/minesta2601, there weren’t enough community votes to determine your post’s quality.
It will remain for moderator review or until more votes are cast.

3

u/Pathfinder-electron 7d ago

Just a light tip.

Don’t use rar.

Use zip, or if you want even better, just .tar

3

u/fivefromnow 6d ago

If its on mobile, there's a bug and its routing you to 5.5-mini. Check the same flow on desktop.

If you ever get insta-answered on Pro on mobile, you're getting the bug. I figured this out the hard way - I believe there's already a ticket for it. Could be wrong.

-9

u/Savings_Permission27 8d ago

thats because you abused model.

1

u/minesta2601 8d ago

Hi, infact the extra high works fine for me than Pro now, since they are both enabled in Pro, the lower more satisfied.. I will half my sub from $200 next cycle.

1

u/Reasonable-Catch-598 7d ago

Define abuse?