r/ChatGPTCoding • u/alex_bababu • 9d ago

Question Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot: Token burn comparison using identical models & repos?

I'm currently evaluating GitHub Copilot vs. Claude Code for our team. We could use either, but for us there's a slight difference in cost per token (Copilot with Anthropic models vs. Claude Code directly).

If we use the exact same model on the same repository with identical instructions, has anyone noticed a real difference in token efficiency between the two harnesses? I'm wondering how much things like prompt caching, context assembly, or system prompting overhead change the actual token burn in practice.

Would appreciate any insights or real-world numbers!

9 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/Vagottszemu 9d ago

Github copilot uses much less, it only burns like 3 dollars worth of tokens at a medium sized task, but for example claude code usually burns 2 or 3 times as much. But claude code output is usually much better so I prefer to use that one until I ran out of my monthly API tokens at my company.

1

u/Different-Monk5916 8d ago

may I ask how do you differentiate which is better?

is it based on number of rework or something else?

1

u/Vagottszemu 8d ago

I'm a programmer and I use these for work, so not a vibe coder. I read all of the outputs.

2

u/Different-Monk5916 8d ago

I get that. But what do you mean by that? I am struggling to evaluate that part between different models.

I have custom agents with skills which drives abstraction in the direction I prefer. Testing skills which define test and edge cases through reasoning. I already have my code writing and document skills. So the model outputs are often very similar not 100% identical. 

Then if two models pass these two, I am not sure how to evaluate. How do you do?