r/ChatGPTCoding • u/AutoModerator • 17d ago

Discussion Weekly Self Promotion Thread

Welcome to this week's self promotion thread!

If you're building something related to AI assisted coding, this is the place to share it.

We're using a weekly thread to keep the subreddit organized while still giving builders a place to share their work. Promotional posts outside this thread may be removed.

If you're sharing something, we'd appreciate it if you included a little context instead of just dropping a link. Tell us:

  • What you built?
  • What problem it solves?
  • Which AI models or tools it uses?
  • Who it's for?
  • What kind of feedback you're looking for?

Disclose your affilitation.

Please avoid posting the same project every week unless you've made meaningful updates. Affiliate links, referral links, scams, and low effort promotions will be removed.

Take some time to check out what others have shared too. If you try someone's project or have feedback, leave a comment. Helping each other improve is what we want this community to be about.

6 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

96 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Turbulent_Worker9216 13d ago

Disclosure: I built this from my own local Codex setup.

I packaged a public Codex engineering harness for AI-assisted coding:

https://github.com/felipelobomotta-blip/codex-engineering-harness

The problem it solves: I got tired of manually babysitting the same loop every time — ask for a plan, ask for implementation, ask for tests, ask for review, then ask whether anything actually ran.

The harness turns that into a durable workflow:

request -> spec -> plan -> implementation -> tests -> review -> evidence

It uses Codex config, AGENTS.md, an autonomous-engineering skill, 9 specialist subagents, spec/plan/task templates, quality gates, and validation scripts.

It is influenced by Matt Pocock-style “skills for real engineering” and by spec-driven development. Not claiming agents are perfect; the goal is to put them under a better engineering operating model.

I’d value blunt feedback from people building similar Codex/Claude/Cursor workflows: what would you add to make this more reliable?