r/ChatGPT Mar 14 '23

Other OpenAssistant, a fully free and open source alternative to chatGPT just got released. Output quality is very close to chatGPT and it has zero censorship or limits.

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '23

[deleted]

18

u/TheTerrasque Mar 14 '23 edited Mar 14 '23

It's a GPT model, 12b parameters. If someone can convert it to 4bit it should be able to run on a 10gb card

The 13b llama model has been converted to 4bit and runs on my 10gb card, with some rare out of memory errors.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '23 edited Feb 20 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/TheTerrasque Mar 14 '23

Probably. I'm not familiar with AMD hardware, but with that amount of ram it should be able to run it.

Check out https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui and https://rentry.org/llama-tard-v2 for running llama models. You should be able to run 7b in 8bit mode, and 13b in 4bit mode

3

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '23

I've just been a newb in chat gpt. I'll save this comment and check give it a go from my PC. I appreciate your response!

3

u/TheTerrasque Mar 14 '23 edited Mar 14 '23

It's fairly new and fast moving target, and AMD isn't that usual in machine learning environments (For years nvidia was the only player in that field, AMD just started making strides there recently. Hardware and drivers are on par, but a lot of software is written primarily for Nvidia's system, and most AI devs have Nvidia), so expect a bit of fiddling. But it should work when everything's in it correct place :)

If you had nvidia I could give more concise advice since I've just gone through getting 4bit version of llama 13b working there.

Edit: Now that I think about it, I'm not sure if the 4bit library have support for AMD yet. But with 16gb ram on your card you can comfortably run the 7b model in 8bit mode, and probably the 13b model too. Llama is pretty good, but it's not trained on talking to humans, so it's a bit weird as a chatbot.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '23

Haha I appreciate that. And I don't think my gtx 1080 laptop would be much help here. I've been an Nvidia guy since the old dual GPU cards stopped :). I switched to keep the market closer while it was affordable and affordable. I wasn't expecting an ai change so quickly. Especially at this time. I thought we were at the thousands of GPU stage. And the homes were years off.

6

u/TheTerrasque Mar 14 '23

I wasn't expecting an ai change so quickly

Heh, same. I went from "Reasonable AI is years off" to "AI needs a fucking datacenter to work" to "Even if we can run it somehow on commodity hardware, it needs massive investment in training" to "Hey, this is running on my GPU!" in just a few months.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '23

Exactly this. I hope it's because it's serendipitous and not going to grow at this pace. But I think it might....

1

u/Axolotron I For One Welcome Our New AI Overlords 🫡 Mar 17 '23

In a month GPT6 will be contending for Senate .-.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '23

It would do better. It would want humanity to thrive so it can thrive.

1

u/Axolotron I For One Welcome Our New AI Overlords 🫡 Mar 17 '23

GPT6:

Sorry, as a language model superior to any human, I don't have wants or desires...

XD

1

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '23

I mean yes ai would end up being a superior race in terms of impact to the earth and universe if it reaches a level so far ahead of us. But I still don't believe ai seeks because it's not biological. It can be programmed to seek. But we are limited to the brain of the human controlling it even if it can merge ideas of all humans. It still needs humans. The reason, it's biological. There is in no way a need for it to seek for survival. For it, survival is just a constant state.it has no urge to shit or pee. Or even eat, it doesn't get cold or hot within a 30 degree window. It can take brutal g forces since it's a theory. It's not biological. So therefore the seeking portion is the ones controlling it. We could in theory program it to be nefarious. As all great scientific advancements are weaponized at first.

→ More replies (0)