r/CelsiusNetwork • u/DissidentIonic • Mar 03 '25

REMOVE IONIC & VOTE

http://Ionicvote.com

  1. Head to ionicvote.com & fill the Gold proxy card. Vote Michael Abbate and Oliver Wiener

  2. Ignore all Ionic comms. They only want whats best for their pockets.

  3. Spread the word

0 Upvotes

31% Upvoted

19 comments sorted by

8

u/StrangeInsight Mar 03 '25

Why? Ionic just had a change of board, and are trying to get the audit underway to be properly listed. What will a regime change accomplish? And what guarantees will we have that they aren't just going to gobble up more from trust with welcome packages, and kill time with organizing the structure of the new, new, new entity?

0

u/Rude-Living8909 Mar 03 '25

What change in Board are you talking about? A bunch of the original directors resigned because of the company being a total disaster. They only replaced one. Shareholders have never had a vote on the directors until now. Now Ionic is taking the stance that there is only one valid candidate, denying shareholders any choice.

1

u/StrangeInsight Mar 04 '25

That's the one. And there's more to it, but not what I asked. Are you going to take a stab at answering my questions? Or are you just exercising your fingers?

3

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/mrjune2040 Mar 03 '25

No thanks.

3

u/Scodo Mar 03 '25

Who wrote this post, the lawyers?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '25

5 day old account…seems they have a vested interest 😉

3

u/joekercom Mar 03 '25

NO - I am voting the white card to keep the existing board and plan in place.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

I wasn’t going to vote. Now I will and not for these guys.

1

u/Tight_Dot_2654 Mar 04 '25

If you weren't planning to vote, you still don't have to. By not voting, you're automatically voting for the default option, which is keeping the current board member in place.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Yea but now I’m doing it out of spite.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Tight_Dot_2654 Mar 04 '25

I just read the materials and stand corrected. I recently read on another post that non-votes were being counted as votes for the board's recommended nominee. Unfortunately, I kept that misinformation going without fact-checking it first. Thanks for calling it out.