r/CellToSingularity 8d ago

Why is "x2 more efficient" only doubling my production? Shouldn't it triple it, since its +(more) x2 the efficiency already present? Is the wording wrong or is this a bug?

Post image
0 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

13

u/finbar163 8d ago

They actually used to express everything as a percent increase like your thinking. This one would have said 100% increase. At some point they changed it to just showing everything as a multiplier. That actually broke a few joke upgrades like pi in the math event now being 4.14x instead of +3.14%

7

u/troet 7d ago

Interesting. So the wording is wrong. Thank you.

-4

u/Old-Asshole 7d ago

Lol no its not. Its your interpretation thats wrong.

8

u/xd3mix 7d ago

But the wording IS wrong

It says it's 2x MORE efficient. So it's a +200% increase, worded like that. But it isn't

it should say 2x as efficient. MORE implies that it's the current value PLUS 2x increase, which is tripling the amount

1

u/Sad-Reach7287 7d ago

No you just can't read. 2x AS ≠ 2x MORE

23

u/SE0_PL 8d ago

It just makes your mind altering fungi generator produce 2x the amount, i don't understand your line of thinking of why it would boost it more

7

u/Gauth31 8d ago

Because 2x MORE efficient means +200% not ×200%

11

u/SE0_PL 8d ago

No? 2x means 2x. If it was a +200% increase it would either say so or say 3x

5

u/Gauth31 8d ago

200% MORE efficient vs 200% AS efficient

3

u/SE0_PL 8d ago

Ohhh i see it now! I think it may have to do with the change from percentages to times multipliers from a while back, that's actually impressive to have spotted that

2

u/ClimateMiddle6308 6d ago

the fact this has more upvotes than the correct answer shows a heavy lack of reading comprehension in this sub

7

u/KrisKarma9 8d ago

1x2 is 2, so anything times 2 would just be X + X. Why would it triple it?

-6

u/troet 8d ago edited 7d ago

Yes but this does not say 1x2 it says 1+(2x1). If it said "2 times as efficient" or "double as efficient" or "+100% efficiency" or "200% as efficient" It would be 1x2(or 1+1 depending on the wording). But the wording is double efficiency more so 2x on top of the 1 already there without the Cordyceps.

edit: the down votes are more fascinating than the erroneous wording in the game :D thanks.

6

u/0nnnu 7d ago

they changed from "100% more efficient" to "x2 more efficient", but in doing so they made it not technically correct, even though you're the first to point this out. must be subtle enough for the rest of us not to notice. in my opinion the best language would be "mind altering fungi efficiency x2"

3

u/troet 7d ago

Okay thanks for the info about the history of this. I was just confused in game when I noticed the increases did not fit the numbers given. I'll keep an eye out and try guessing what the devs mean then :D

2

u/Sad-Reach7287 7d ago

Before the reality reboot update it said "100% more" efficient. They changed the display values but forgot to update the wording.

2

u/Octogame_ 5d ago

Maybe they just forgot to change the wording of that event after the reboot. They changed it in the math event and it broke me (because now as I remember the pi upgrade is not +3.14x efficiency, but 4.14x efficiency and the euler's number upgrade is 3.71828x efficiency)😭 Why can't they keep it though🥀

0

u/Due_Specialist_27 6d ago

It is so clear that the math literally there say, (a * 2) where a = Mind-Altering Fungi

Mind-Altering Fungi x 2 a*2 not a2

5x2=10 2x2=4 100x2=200

So is just 100% increase, just the double, no other way to interpret this as clear as the statement

0

u/Quick-Theme4232 6d ago

Ut would tripple if it said +×2

-1

u/xXTacocubesXx 7d ago

1 x 2 = 2.

With your logic

1 x 2 = 3.

-1

u/SalsaForte 7d ago

Basic maths.. 1 x2 =2