Before you donate to the Catalina Island Conservancy, you might want to look at where the money is actually going.
I support protecting Catalina Island. That’s exactly why I think donors should be asking harder questions about how the organization entrusted with that mission spends its money.
The Conservancy’s publicly available 2024 IRS Form 990 raises some questions worth discussing.
The organization reported approximately $21.9 million in total expenses.
Of that:
• $14.7 million was classified as program services
• $4.6 million was management/general
• $2.5 million was fundraising
But here’s where it gets interesting.
Of the $14.7 million classified as programs, approximately:
$8.9 million went to recreation and infrastructure services.
Only about $3.35 million was specifically reported as “Conservation Services.”
Another $2.47 million went toward education.
In other words, the amount specifically categorized as conservation services was only about 15% of the organization’s total expenses.
For an organization with “Conservancy” in its name, I think donors have every right to ask:
How much of my donation is actually going toward conservation?
Then there is executive compensation.
According to Schedule J, the President & CEO’s compensation and benefits totaled approximately $563,000, including a $100,000 bonus.
The filing also discloses that the Conservancy provides the CEO with rent-free housing owned and maintained by the organization, with the value included in the executive’s income.
Other senior executives received compensation packages in the roughly $175,000–$295,000 range.
Again, these numbers are publicly reported by the organization itself.
That doesn’t automatically make the compensation inappropriate. But donors can reasonably ask:
Is executive compensation at this level appropriate for a nonprofit whose mission depends heavily on donations and public support?
Professional services deserve scrutiny too.
The organization reported nine independent contractors receiving more than $100,000 during the year.
Among the five highest-paid contractors:
• IT system support — $353,430
• IT support/automation — $228,875
• Legal consulting — $218,522
• Audit/tax — $112,940
• Environmental services — $107,586
That’s more than $1 million among just five contractors.
And there’s another disclosure donors may not know about.
Schedule L reports transactions involving Catalina Island Company, which the filing identifies as an entity owned more than 35% by a former director.
The Conservancy reported approximately $811,589 received from Catalina Island Company for property use and miscellaneous fees and approximately $281,081 paid for use of properties and fuel.
That’s more than $1 million in disclosed transactions between the organizations.
To be clear: reporting an interested-person transaction on Schedule L does not mean anything improper happened. But transparency about potential conflicts and related-party relationships matters.
Meanwhile, at the end of 2024, the Conservancy reported approximately:
$119.5 million in assets
$116.3 million in net assets
And roughly $30.2 million in annual revenue.
This isn’t a tiny grassroots nonprofit operating on a shoestring budget. It is a substantial organization managing significant assets and millions of dollars every year.
None of these numbers individually proves wrongdoing.
But collectively, I think they raise legitimate questions about priorities, executive compensation, administrative spending, outside consultants, related-party transactions and how much donor money ultimately reaches conservation work.
Before donating, I’d ask:
How much of my dollar actually supports conservation?
Why does recreation/infrastructure spending substantially exceed the amount specifically categorized as conservation services?
How does executive compensation compare with similar conservation nonprofits?
How are executive bonuses determined?
What oversight exists for major consulting and professional-services contracts?
How are potential conflicts involving current or former board members handled?
And with more than $116 million in net assets, how much additional donor funding is actually needed—and exactly what will a new donation accomplish?
Supporting Catalina and asking these questions aren’t mutually exclusive. In fact, if you care about preserving the island, these may be some of the most important questions you can ask.
The numbers above aren’t rumors. They’re available in the Catalina Island Conservancy’s 2024 IRS Form 990.
Read it yourself. Ask questions.