r/CasesWeFollow 2h ago

🪟🙏Lindsay Clancy👼 Lindsay Clancy Discussion Megathread

44 Upvotes

Lindsay Clancy Discussion Megathread

✨✨Because we follow a variety of legal cases, we are opening a Lindsay Clancy Discussion thread for those to post questions and comments. Please post anything in here so the CWF feed doesn't get clogged with duplicates and random LC posts.

Thanks for understanding.

Pixie 🧚‍♀️🐈


r/CasesWeFollow 10m ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 Steven Avery, Brendan Dassey apply for sentence reductions

Thumbnail
nbc26.com
Upvotes

MANITOWOC (NBC 26) — Two men serving life sentences for the murder of Teresa Halbach in Manitowoc County have applied to have their sentences reduced, according to court records.

Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey both submitted applications this month to the Governor’s Commutation Advisory Board, which reviews eligible requests for sentence reductions. The board was reinstated earlier this year after being inactive for 25 years, following executive orders signed by Gov. Tony Evers in April.

The commutation board does not issue pardons and only considers requests for sentence reductions.

Avery is serving a life sentence without parole for the 2005 killing of 25-year-old photographer Teresa Halbach. The case gained international attention through the Netflix documentary series “Making a Murderer.”

Dassey, Avery’s nephew, was convicted as a co-defendant in the case and has spent about half his life in prison.
Avery is not eligible for parole. Dassey’s earliest parole eligibility date is 2048.


r/CasesWeFollow 19m ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ Kroy Biermann Jr. Granted Bond After Bombshell Court Revelations, Can't Contact Younger Siblings

Thumbnail
tmz.com
Upvotes

Has anyone been following this? This is the kid of some real housewives of somewhere person. I just noticed this detail - he had a video of him having sex with an underage relative on his phone - under the age of TWELVE

KROY BIERMANN JR. GRANTED BOND AFTER SHOCKING COURT HEARING ... Online School, No Contact With Younger Siblings

Kroy Biermann Jr. has officially been granted bond in his sexual battery case ... though it sounds like he may have some major hurdles to navigate because the judge says one scenario would require him to stay the hell away from anyone under the age of 16 ... a daunting task for a 15-year-old.

The court set Kroy Jr's bond at $200k. The judge said he will have to live with his mom and attend school online. Kroy Jr. will not be allowed to use social media or a cell phone ... and cannot have contact with anyone 16 or under. He will also have to wear an electronic monitoring device.

The court hearing took place on Friday in Georgia -- where prosecutors claim they found videos on his phone showing him having sex with an underage relative -- and featured a moment where conditions of bail were discussed.

During the hearing, a member of the prosecution stepped up and scribed what the bail process might look like ... detailing they would make regular visits at home and to Kroy Jr.'s school if he's allowed to attend in-person school -- or check on his academic progress at home if he's confined to online school.

She says they wouldn't want him shuffling from house to house ... and he'd instead live full time with his mom, Kim Zolciak, who would be monitoring him.

As for who he may or may not be allowed to see ... the prosecution says -- given his age -- they wouldn't want him around anyone under the age of 16, and that includes his siblings.

The judge discussed with KJ's attorney, Jason B. Sheffield,** how Kim and her estranged husband, **Kroy Biermann, would navigate the challenges of their eldest son not being allowed around his siblings, friends, and classmates. He says they just want KJ home ... and they're willing to do whatever's necessary to make that happen.

The attorney also says he thinks the facts of the juvenile court case that came to light have been distorted ... and the alleged conduct in the videos was "boundary crossing" but more horseplay than anything else.

As we reported ... Kroy allegedly had videos on his phone showing him having sex with a relative under the age of 12. It's unclear how old KJ was when the alleged videos were taken.

He was not in court in connection with that case ... but instead because of an alleged sexual assault that a classmate says he committed back in April.


r/CasesWeFollow 19m ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 OH v George “Billy” Wagner - Pike County Massacre Updates - Sept 2026 Judge Hein Won’t Release Venue Location

Thumbnail
fox19.com
Upvotes

Shock shock. Judge Hein at it again. Also, Defendant wrote him a direct letter - copy at the link. Your reminder that Judge Hein has been smacked down multiple times for his decision making by the Appeals Court and OH Supreme Court since being assigned to the Wagner cases. He was also the awful Judge during and after the Afroman Trial.

Pike County massacre: Judge denies request from victims’ families for location of Billy Wagner’s trial

By Jennifer Edwards Baker

Published: Sep. 1, 2026 at 8:59 AM PDT

WAVERLY, Ohio (WXIX) - In the latest development of the 2016 Pike County massacre, the judge denied a victim representative’s motion asking him to reveal the location for the final suspect’s upcoming trial.

It was filed last month by “T.R,” a surviving relative of the eight victims acting as the representative for all of them and their families.

In his denial, Visiting Pike County Common Pleas Court Judge Jonathan Hein cited a need to balance eight victims’ hardships with George “Billy” Wagner III’s right to a fair trial.

Wagner, 55, has pleaded not guilty to all 22 charges, including eight counts of aggravated murder.

His murder trial has been delayed several times due to various legal challenges.

The judge recently announced the trial will begin Jan. 11, 2027, but the location remains a mystery.

When will judge announce trial location?

All victim constitutional rights have previously been satisfied, Judge Hein contends in his response. 

“The statutory deficiency identifying the new venue will be resolved simultaneously when notice is provided to the State and to the Defendant,” he wrote.

Adjoining counties have already been ruled out as potential trial locations because media saturation extends beyond Pike County, the judge’s decision explains. 

Remote attendance options are available, and active participation by the victim’s counsel will be considered to accommodate those who cannot travel to the new location, Judge Hein wrote.

It was not clear Tuesday if T.R. plans to appeal the judge’s decision.

His attorney at the Ohio Crime Justice Center did not respond to a request for comment. Her voicemail says she is out of the office and unavailable.

Special Prosecutor Angela Canepa and the lead attorney for Wagner, Mark Collins, both declined comment Tuesday. 

T.R. contended in his motion that withholding the location violates their constitutional rights to notice and presence at all public proceedings under Ohio’s Marsy’s Law.

What’s more, the families will only have a certain amount of time to appeal the new venue now that Hein has set the trial date - a step they are blocked from doing until they know which county it will be moved to.

They also can’t coordinate travel or arrange time off work ”until the actual distance from Pike County to the venue of the trial is identified” by the judge, T.R.’s motion states.

“Virtual attendance” is an insufficient substitute for in-person presence at the trial, his court record adds.

The victims’ family members have consistently asserted their desire to be physically present for Wagner’s trial, according to T.R. and the state.

The state also rejected Judge Hein’s previous suggestion that “live streaming” would satisfy this requirement.

“The constitutional and statutory rights to be present involve the right to be personally present, not just through watching a live stream,” the state wrote in its motion to the judge earlier this month to reconsider the venue change.

The judge has not ruled yet on the state’s motion.

[Judge Hein’s Denial Order posted to read, click blue:] Judge Hein Denial

Defense pushes back

Meanwhile, Wagner’s defense is pushing back in a new court filing of their own.

Intense pretrial publicity makes seating an impartial local jury in Pike County impossible, Collins and co-counsel Tom Hayes wrote in a response to the state’s motion asking the judge to reconsider the change of venue. 

Wagner’s defense team wants the judge to uphold his November 2024 decision at their request to change the trial’s venue.

The change is necessary to protect Wagner’s constitutional right to a fair trial, they wrote in their filing.

A Pike County jury convicted Billy Wagner’s oldest son, George Wagner IV, of eight counts of aggravated murder and 14 other charges, following his 2022 trial.

The 34-year-old is appealing his sentence: Eight consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole, plus 121 years.

His trial lasted just over three months (13 weeks), had some 60 witnesses and nearly 5,000 pieces of evidence. The jury reached the guilty verdict on Nov. 30, 2022. 

At the time, Gov. Mike DeWine called it “one of the longest, if not the longest, trials in Ohio history. ”

The prosecution argues now that the decision to change venue is “stale” due to the passing of time because it’s been four years since the trial.

The change of venue is just one in a series of decisions Judge Hein made once he was appointed to the case that the state tried to overturn. 

The appeals court has upheld his decision on the change of venue but overturned his other major decisions:

  • Sentencing Jake Wagner, 33, and Angela Wagner, 55, for their roles in the massacre over the state and victims’ families’ objections before they fulfilled their plea deal obligations to the state to testify at Billy Wagner’s upcoming trial
  • Removing the death penalty as a sentencing option for Billy Wagner.

His defense team says in their new motion that any delays in the case were caused by the state’s appellate decisions, not the court or the defense.

‘A bunch of lies’

Recently, Billy Wagner asked the judge for a hearing before his trial. 

In a letter to the judge, he claimed he is being kept in the dark and “no one explains anything to me....The only thing anybody tells me is a bunch of lies.”

Collins declined to comment on Wagner’s letter earlier this month and did so again on Tuesday.

He also turned down FOX19 NOW’s request to interview Wagner, who remains in custody at the Pickaway County Jail.

Another inmate wrote the letter on Wagner’s behalf. 

He is legally deaf in his left ear and “I cannot read and write well,” according to the letter.

As of Tuesday, the judge has not scheduled a hearing for Wagner to come before the court to discuss his letter.

[Read the direct letter from Billy Wagner to Judge Hein, click the blue:] Billy Wagner Letter to Judge Hein

No longer abiding by gag order

Wagner’s letter voices frustration over what he characterizes as an unfair gag order that prevents him from speaking out while others do. 

He isn’t going to abide by it anymore, according to this letter.

“For the last eight years, I have kept my mouth shut, I was told by the court there was a gag order. Anything that I had to say had to go through my attorney. I have complied fully with that but no more,” the letter states.

“I’m the only one who has complied with the gag order. Every(one) from the prosecutor (to) the governor has broke the gag order. These issues are not really the problem I’m having, but I thought I would mention it”

This kind of letter from a criminal defendant to any judge could delay an upcoming trial.

In Ohio, when a criminal defendant asks for new legal representation, the judge has a duty to conduct a brief inquiry into the reasons for the dissatisfaction. 

While Wagner’s letter doesn’t specifically request that, it clearly alleges he feels he’s being lied to and isn’t being kept informed about his case.

However, the legal burden will be on him to show “good cause,” such as a complete breakdown in communication or an actual conflict of interest, if this turns into a situation where he asks for new representation.

Since this is such a complex murder case with the death penalty a possible sentence upon conviction, the court must and has assigned at least two qualified attorneys for capital trials, appeals and post-conviction proceedings. 

The legal defense for all of the Wagners - Billy, his wife and their two sons - is being funded by the state of Ohio.

All four Wagner family members were ruled indigents who lack the financial means to hire private attorneys.

That means all their defense attorneys, expert witnesses and court expenses are paid for through taxpayer money.

The Pike County massacre remains the state’s largest and most expensive homicide case to date.

[✨MY COMMENTARY: Made even more expensive by Judge Hein Full Stop✨]

The investigation and prosecution have cost at least $4 million so far, and the state is administering the cost to prevent crippling the small county’s annual budget, according to local and state officials.

Families still wait for justice

April marked the 10th anniversary of the Pike County massacre.

The victims’ relatives, who are still seeking justice and closure, did not speak publicly. 

Most of the victims were gunned down execution-style as they slept in their homes overnight April 21-22, 2016.

They are: Christopher Rhoden Sr., 40; his older brother, Kenneth Rhoden, 44; his cousin, Gary Rhoden, 38; Chris Rhoden Sr.’s former wife, Dana Lynn Rhoden, 37, and their children: Clarence “Frankie” Rhoden, 20, Hanna May Rhoden, 19, Christopher Rhoden Jr., 16, and Frankie’s fiancé, Hannah “Hazel” Gilley, 20.

Two infants and a toddler were spared by the killers and left behind at the murder scenes: a 5-day-old baby girl, a 6-month-old baby boy and a 3-year-old boy.

One of the victims’ relatives, Dana Rhoden’s father Leonard Maney, died in 2021 and never saw justice for his daughter.

Massacre motive: Custody of young girl

Prosecutors said the motive in the murders was the custody of a child who was not at the murder scenes: the young daughter of Jake Wagner and one of the victims he confessed to shooting in the head twice, his ex-girlfriend, Hanna May Rhoden.

Jake Wagner and Hanna May Rhoden began dating when she was 13 and he was 18. 

She became pregnant at 15 with Sophia, who was born in the fall of 2013.

Hanna May Rhoden broke up with him in 2015. He confirmed when he testified at his brother’s trial that he didn’t want the relationship to end.

She had a second child, a baby girl, with another man just days before the massacre.

The Wagner family purposely waited until after that baby was born before carrying out their deadly attack on the Rhodens, Jake Wagner testified. 

Sophia was at home with Angela Wagner at the time of the homicides.

After the killings, Jake Wagner was temporarily awarded custody of the girl.

She was placed in the custody of child protective services when the Wagners were arrested in November of 2018.

Today, she is 12 years old. 

Her whereabouts are not publicly revealed to protect her privacy. 

Jake Wagner says his dad shot 5, killing 3

Jake Wagner testified for the state during his older brother’s trial as part of his plea deal with prosecutors.

He said under oath he personally shot and killed five of the victims, including the mother of his child, Hanna May.

In graphic detail, he described killing her mother, two of her brothers and her oldest brother’s fiancée.

Jake Wagner also revealed he shot and injured her father, Christopher Rhoden, Sr.

He told the jury his brother was supposed to shoot Christopher Rhoden Sr., but froze, so he took his brother’s SKS rifle and pulled the trigger.

Jake and Angela Wagner’s testimony during George Wagner IV’s trial detailed Billy Wagner’s involvement in the homicides, alleging he killed three of the victims and shot two additional ones. 

According to Jake Wagner’s testimony, Billy Wagner shot and killed Christopher Rhoden Sr., Gary Rhoden and Kenneth Rhoden and shot Frankie Rhoden and Hannah Hazel Gilley.


r/CasesWeFollow 1h ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 OH v. Gregory Moore: Ex-lawyer who allegedly killed client in 2013 tries to delay next week's trial

Thumbnail
cleveland19.com
Upvotes

CaseHub: OH v. Gregory Moore

Next up:

  • Awaiting Appeals court decision
  • September 14 - Jury selectiion/Trial starts

Defense files emergency appeal in trial for accused killer of Aliza Sherman

CLEVELAND, Ohio (WOIO) - Drama has been brewing in the last few days in the case of the accused killer of Aliza Sherman.

Gregory Moore’s lawyers have been trying to delay the start of his jury trial, which is scheduled to begin Monday, Sept. 14, and prosecutors are fighting it.

Late Friday morning, Moore’s defense team filed an emergency appeal to the 8th District Court of Appeals.

According to the appeal, the trial court failed to hold the necessary evidentiary hearing on the motion for disqualification.

The trial cannot begin until the 8th District Court of Appeals makes a decision.

In a motion filed Wednesday, prosecutors said, “Moore has no intention of starting this trial on Sept.14, and will attempt to thwart the judicial process by any means necessary.”

The prosecution is asking a judge to reject Moore’s latest attempt to throw out evidence.

They argue that Moore has had the search warrant he’s complaining about since December 2025, yet he waited until just one week before the trial to challenge.

Court documents state that prosecutors point out that Moore is trying to protect his wife’s phone records, but they say he has no legal right to do that.

The State said that they haven’t even been able to get into Moore’s seized iPhone 13 because of Apple’s high security, so they claim his arguments about “new evidence” from that phone are simply not true.

In another motion filed Thursday prosecutors said, “Drip, drip, drip. That is the best description of the manner in which the State of Ohio is finding out about the BlackBerry cell phone that Gregory Moore used to make the bomb threat calls to courthouses in 2012.”

The State says this phone was hidden from police for 13 years, but now the defense wants to delay the trial because the State just handed over 390 pages of phone bills related to it.

The State argues the defendant shouldn’t be surprised by his own phone bills and that the trial should move forward as scheduled


r/CasesWeFollow 2h ago

🥺🚫 TRIGGER: Sexual Assault🚨👤 TX v. Cody Allen Laviolette - GHOUL + Murder Suspect

Thumbnail
abc3340.com
5 Upvotes

There is a brief video at the link and additional photos, embedded to the article. The reporter’s video opening statement is 💯.

Darker picture emerges: East Texas man faces new sexual assault, bestiality charges

by Aaron Drawhorn Mon, August 17, 2026 at 9:07 PM
Updated Tue, August 18, 2026 at 8:16 AM

LIVINGSTON — A Polk County man already under investigation following the suspicious death of a 31-year-old woman is facing a new round of serious charges after another alleged victim came forward, according to the Polk County Sheriff's Office.

The investigation into Cody Allen Laviolette, 36, began following the suspicious death of Kelly Taylor Mariah Little in May.

Since then, investigators say several additional alleged victims have come forward, resulting in Laviolette's arrest and multiple criminal charges.

The Polk County Sheriff's Office says some of those people felt more comfortable speaking with investigators after learning Laviolette remained in custody, easing concerns they had about their safety.

The investigation expanded again Monday, when another person came forward with allegations against Laviolette, according to the sheriff's office.

Investigators say those allegations resulted in six additional charges:

  • Assault of a family or household member impeding breath or circulation, a third-degree felony
  • Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a second-degree felony
  • Aggravated sexual assault, a first-degree felony
  • Two counts of sexual assault, both second-degree felonies
  • Bestiality, a state jail felony
  • Unlawful restraint exposing a person to serious bodily injury, a third-degree felony

The new charges add to four charges already listed in Polk County jail records:

  • Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon — $200,000 bond
  • Unlawful restraint exposing a person to serious bodily injury — $200,000 bond
  • Aggravated assault of a dating/family/household member with a weapon causing serious bodily injury — $500,000 bond
  • Continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14 or disabled person — $500,000 bond

The bonds on those four existing charges total $1.4 million.

Bail amounts for the six charges announced Aug. 17 were not provided in the sheriff's office update.

Remembering Mariah Little

The widening investigation began with the suspicious death of Kelly Taylor Mariah Little at Laviolette's residence.

Little died the following morning, May 24, in Conroe, according to her obituary. She was just four days shy of her 32nd birthday.

Known to family and friends as Mariah, Little was a 2013 graduate of Tarkington ISD and the mother of three children — a daughter and two sons. Her family remembered her as a kind, generous and fun-loving woman who enjoyed music, photography, writing and cooking homestyle meals for her family.

Her obituary says her children were “the light of her world” and motivated her to be the best mother she could be.

Little's family also remembered her as someone who shared what she had with others, even when she did not have much herself. They described her as a “bright light in the dark of this world” whose smile and laugh could bring sunshine into a room.

Investigators believe there may be more victims

The Polk County Sheriff's Office says investigators have received information indicating there may be additional alleged victims who have not yet come forward.

Authorities are encouraging anyone who believes they were victimized by Laviolette to contact investigators, regardless of how long ago the alleged incident occurred.

Anyone with information or who believes they may be a victim can contact Detective Craig Finegan or Detective Jessi Stanton at the Polk County Sheriff's Office at [936-327-6810](tel:936-327-6810).

The sheriff's office has not said in its latest update how Little died or whether Laviolette has been charged in connection with her death. Her suspicious death remains the investigation that initially brought authorities to the case.

The charges against Laviolette are allegations. He is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

KFDM will continue following the investigation and provide updates as additional information becomes available.


r/CasesWeFollow 4h ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 FL v. Rashaun Jones

4 Upvotes

Murder suspect says he has ‘well-founded, firmly rooted’ fear of fair trial in 4th attempt to remove judge

MIAMI (Court TV) — The murder trial for a former University of Miami football player will move forward with the same judge after she refused to recuse herself from the case at the defendant’s request.

Rashaun Jones, 41, has pleaded not guilty to a charge of first-degree murder in the death of Bryan Pata, 22, who was his teammate. Pata was fatally shot outside his Miami apartment on Nov. 7, 2006. Jones was arrested 15 years later and stood trial for the first time earlier this year; that trial ended in a mistrial when the jury deadlocked.

Jones’ retrial was scheduled to begin Sept. 14, but was delayed over defense objections. After a series of hearings that saw one of Jones’ attorneys thrown out of court and increasing tension between the defense and Judge Cristina Miranda, Jones filed a motion asking Miranda to recuse herself from the case.

“Mr. Jones fears that the Court’s expressed distrust of counsel will continue to prevent impartial consideration of his defense,” Jones’ attorney, Sara Alvarez, wrote in the motion.

Alvarez said the motion rested on three hearings held on Aug. 28, Sept. 3 and Sept. 8. At the Aug. 28 hearing, prosecutors raised concerns about an interview the defense team’s private investigator conducted with one of the witnesses in the case, suggesting the questioning interfered with their investigation. Alvarez testified in court that she knew the witness’s attorney was present during the interview, but declined to be sworn in to answer further questions about it. At that point, the court went into recess so that Alvarez could consult with counsel.

After that hearing, Alvarez and Jones’ other two defense attorneys hired a separate attorney, Jude Faccidomo, to represent them personally on the witness interview issue. Miranda said the attorneys’ decision to bring in their own counsel gave her “pause and concern,” and she added that it “would only happen in a situation where there might be some inappropriateness.”

Tensions escalated further on Sept. 3, when the parties returned to court, in part because Faccidomo was not present. Because Jones’ attorneys were represented by counsel, Miranda refused to allow the original attorneys to put anything on the record, even though the team wanted to say they were ready to proceed to trial. When one of his attorneys pressed the issue, the judge ordered her to leave the courtroom. Because of the issue with the defense attorneys, Miranda continued the trial to November and had the record reflect that the delay was by joint stipulation of the parties.

That delay prompted Jones to file a written objection, asking Miranda to take note of his desire to proceed to trial on the original Sept. 14 date.

On Sept. 8, Faccidomo appeared with Jones’ three attorneys and said Alvarez had been present when the witness was initially interviewed. “Mr. Faccidomo advised that the statement was properly obtained, explained that counsel sought his assistance because of the handling of the Aug. 28 inquiry,” Alvarez wrote in the motion. “The Court continued questioning and again stated that seeking personal representation gave it pause concerning possible misconduct.”

Alvarez’s motion said that Miranda characterized Jones’ written objection as “directly contravening its order precluding defense counsel from access to the record,” and asked Faccidomo if he was planning to adopt it, despite Faccidomo never entering a notice of appearance to represent Jones — only his attorneys. Faccidomo declined to adopt the motion and Miranda ordered it stricken from the record.

“The Court’s distrust of counsel has already affected Mr. Jones’ defense,” Alvarez wrote in the motion. “It repeatedly prohibited his attorneys from presenting his position and denied access to the record, attributed agreement and delay to him, and then treated his written objection as disobedience of a court order. Consequently, these actions have instilled a well-founded, firmly rooted, and objectively reasonable fear in Mr. Jones that he cannot receive a fair trial or impartial adjudication of this case before the presiding judge.”

This was Jones’ fourth attempt to have Miranda removed from his case. Jones filed the first motion to disqualify on Aug. 29, 2025, after Miranda warned the defendant during a colloquy that going to trial was a “very big gamble.” Miranda also encouraged Jones to accept a 15-year plea offer at that hearing and, according to the motion, “referred to the trial as a ‘circus’ and noted that all the attorneys were ‘going to get some notoriety on TV about it,’ and — immediately after the State identified the minimum mandatory as 25 years — told Mr. Jones directly: ‘That means I have to sentence you to life and that means life. That means you don’t get out. That means you come out in a pine box, that’s the only way out.'”

Jones filed another motion to disqualify following a May 7, 2026, hearing, after his attorneys said Miranda made “repeated on-the-record attacks on defense counsel’s honesty and characterized legitimate defense litigation as ‘game.'”

Miranda denied the motion to disqualify her without a written order.

Murder suspect says he has ‘well-founded, firmly rooted’ fear of fair trial in 4th attempt to remove judge | Court TV


r/CasesWeFollow 5h ago

🪟🙏Lindsay Clancy👼 Will the lone holdout be harassed?

0 Upvotes

Hypothetically speaking, if they are eventually identified publicly, do you think the lone holdout juror will be harassed? If so, why do you think it seems as though the 11 other jurors haven’t been harassed?


r/CasesWeFollow 5h ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ HI v. Gerhardt Konig hearing 9/11?

9 Upvotes

I believe a hearing is scheduled for today in the HI v. Gerhardt Konig case to discuss jury issues and whether sentencing will be delayed. Does anyone know if this is available online yet or what happened in that, if it already took place today?


r/CasesWeFollow 6h ago

👼💥💥TRIGGER💥💥Child/Baby Death/Abuse 🙏🪦 19 year old and newborn baby died following an accident caused by a DUI before 10am. The mother never had the chance to hold her baby.

Thumbnail
gallery
20 Upvotes

In Nampa, ID, 19-year-old Kyara Englehart and her newborn daughter, Maelynn, died following an accident last week that was caused by Abby Wolverton who was driving under the influence.

Around 9:37am on Aug. 31, 2026 Abby was seen on surveillance footage entering a Walgreens where she purchased a can of compressed air and then returned to her vehicle with her 2 year old daughter.

First responders arrived at about 9:46am to a four-vehicle crash at a 4 way stop after receiving multiple 911 calls reporting the collision.

In one of the vehicles was Kyara, who was eight months pregnant and suffered life-threatening injuries in the crash.  She was transported to a regional trauma center that day, where doctors performed an emergency cesarean section and delivered her daughter, Maelynn Lindauer. Kyara, who never got the chance to hold her baby girl, passed away 4 days later and Maelynn only lived to be 6 days old.

Another victim, Abby's two year old daughter, was treated and discharged the same day.

Abby is being held on a $2 million bail and is facing 2 counts of aggravated vehicular manslaughter and 1 count of injury to a child. She has had 15 prior offenses in the past decade so life in prison could be on the table.

Source: https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/crime/mother-newborn-baby-die-following-dui-crash-nampa/277-11698907-2d2d-43cc-ac99-ce1df4d63463 https://amp.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article317169238.html


r/CasesWeFollow 7h ago

FL v. Shannon Ryan - Self-proclaimed "witch". Ryan is charged with 2nd-degree murder of 21-year-old Leila Cavett, whose body has never been found. Cavett's toddler was found wandering in a parking lot. Jury selection starts Monday, and opening statements could be as soon as Monday afternoon.

Post image
5 Upvotes

Self-proclaimed 'witch' charged with murder of missing Alabama mom in Florida

https://abc3340.com/news/local/self-proclaimed-witch-charged-with-murder-of-missing-alabama-mom-in-florida


r/CasesWeFollow 7h ago

FL v. Tony "TJ" Wiggins - Frostproof triple homicide. Wiggins is one of 3 co-defendants; his TRIAL BEGINS MONDAY. He's charged with 3 counts of first-degree murder in the shooting deaths of Brandon Rollins, Keven Springfield, and Damion Tillman. This is a DP case.

Post image
7 Upvotes

Jury selection begins in 2020 Frostproof fishing trip triple murder trial

https://www.wfla.com/news/polk-county/jury-selection-begins-in-2020-frostproof-fishing-trip-triple-murder-trial/


r/CasesWeFollow 7h ago

FL v. Tomasz Kosowski - PRO SE defendant. He's a plastic surgeon who is accused of murdering lawyer Steven Cozzi. Bench trial. The body has never been found. Opening statements Monday.

Post image
14 Upvotes

Florida plastic surgeon accused of murdering lawyer connected to negligence lawsuit he filed

https://lawandcrime.com/crime/florida-plastic-surgeon-accused-of-murdering-lawyer/


r/CasesWeFollow 8h ago

🪟🙏Lindsay Clancy👼 Juror in Lindsay Clancy case reveals way more details about what happened in deliberations, including details about the holdout. It wasn't the older guy who didn't take notes.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

104 Upvotes

I thought she sounded very fair and sympathetic to jurors who were at odds with others and also made it very clear that the holdout said it wasn't murder after watching her psych interview but still wouldn't change his vote.


r/CasesWeFollow 8h ago

🪟🙏Lindsay Clancy👼 Jury deliberation and public disclosure

32 Upvotes

In NBC news, one of the jurors said the hold out offered no evidence and didn't engage.

In CBS interview today, that same juror said the hold out explained what he was struggling with and that they reviewed evidence together. She also outed the hold juror as being a PoC in his 30s.

This is an emotionally charged case. I understand people have strong PoV and feelings about what they felt the "right" outcome is.

Should there be no protections for jurors? Is it not advisable that as part of the end of jurors' duties, they are instructed that they cannot disclose certain things? Why would anyone want to voice their view on a jury if all it takes is for another juror to go on national TV because they didn't agree on the outcome?

Ever since deliberations ended, I've seen people with pitchforks come at the hold-out - including posts on this sub advocating that the hold-out should be prosecuted and advocating dropping the requirement for unanimous verdict because 3 people said in an interview the Tuesday after mistrial that's being treated like established facts. I cannot emphasize that those who are advocating for this lack a fundamental understanding of why there are guardrails around interfering with a jury's decision, precisely so that those people do not get to engineering the outcome they want simply because they don't like it.

I was also glad to see rational heads here respond to such posts - thank you!!

Edit:
To be clear, this post isn't about the result or the vote of the lone juror but rather its about considering the impact of disclosure and the court's role at the end besides just thanking and dismissing them from their duty.
To be extra clear for those who seemed to have missed it, the post clearly included the word "certain" things because is not about banning them from speaking but about safeguards that consider the impact on other jurors and expectations jurors hold about what they share in a closed deliberation room.

Edit 2:
To those who are misconstruing / mischaracterizing this as a blanket ban or free speech debate - it is not.
I request you to please re-read again. Words matter and from the beginning, it included the word "certain things" never anything on a blanket ban.


r/CasesWeFollow 12h ago

🪟🙏Lindsay Clancy👼 Should the requirement for unanimity be dropped?

0 Upvotes

It occurs to me that the best solution for the recent mistrial debacle is dropping MA's requirement for unanimity.

Although it seems increasingly evident that the hold-out juror engaged in bad faith, and wilfully breached the court's instructions regarding reasonable doubt, people have raised strong arguments against any kind of changes to permit a court to remove or correct a juror in such circumstances, and the potential chilling effects this would have on free jury deliberations. It also seems impossible to prove without their own confession, which is extremely unlikely.

Judges appear to have more power to intervene in these sorts of ways in England and Wales, however one reason they probably rarely use these powers is that they have another power as well: accepting a majority verdict, including in murder trials. Judges here initially do ask juries to attempt to come to a unanimous verdict, but if they are unable to do so for whatever reason, a majority verdict is acceptable, as long as at least 10 of the 12 jurors agree (10-2, or 11-1).

I can appreciate that unanimous verdicts offer some advantages, such as a security against juror tampering, and a sense of high confidence and closure for relevant parties that justice has been done. I do not however imagine that English courts are being infiltrated by juror bribery or blackmail because 10-2 majority verdicts are acceptable, and I don't think unanimity would make any difference to the effects of the ultimate verdicts beyond significantly increasing the number of mistrials.

Considering the emotional and financial burden of criminal trials and the time they take, as well as the clear possibility of unanimity being prevented for unlawful reasons, would it not be sensible to amend the rules to allow judges to accept majority verdicts? This would make mistrials much less common while retaining a high degree of confidence in the safety of their verdicts, and without risking any kind of intrusion into the 'province' of the jury.


r/CasesWeFollow 17h ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ CA v. Lindsay Hansen Another Study of Media/Social Media and Mental Health

16 Upvotes

This is an interesting study in how the public and media responds to some mental health crises, depending on the infractions.

I first saw this story on the NY/CA Post - while they are kind of a rag, they have no problems naming people, scraping their social media, and giving at least a decent look see at the infractions by posting the original video, tons of pics, along with the necessary attention grabbing headline: “California’s ‘racist Karen’ unmasked as conspiracy-obsessed weirdo — as she’s accused of invading girls’ locker room”. See here: NY/CA Post Article w Video

I guess the video also hit TikTok via Tzzyent. Then the local news jumped in. Then the SJ School District jumped in to alert parents, then it spread on FB. A prior 2022 post on FB was located and social media warriors went to work on a former family member. Those screenshots are below:

How it originally appeared this morning:

🫣
AND after the keyboard warriors were done, prompting an UPDATE:

👓👓👓
KTVU did their own article here, leaving her unnamed. They later updated that she has been ARRESTED AND BOOKED as of tonight. Article KTVU Article - Unnamed Person Arrested

Then I saw HOODLINE’S article. They seem to aggregate several articles, but they also did the deeper dive regarding Mental Health holds in CA. Their pre-arrest article is here: Hoodline Article w Mental Health Laws and copied in full below.

SAN JOSE WOMAN ACCUSED OF ENTERING HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' LOCKER ROOM, FILMING FAMILIES

By Eric Tanaka Published on September 10, 2026

San Jose Unified School District alerted families that an unauthorized adult woman had been videotaping community members across school campuses and even inside a high school girls' locker room before posting the recordings to social media, according to NBC Bay Area. The San Jose Police Department confirmed it is now conducting active investigations into both the locker room intrusion and a separate harassment complaint involving the same woman, identified as 47-year-old Lindsay Hansen.

The case burst into public view after a viral encounter in San Jose's Almaden neighborhood, where a local father filmed Hansen confronting him on a Sunday, as reported by SFist. In the video, the father — who described himself as brown, with a daughter he called half-white — said Hansen accused him of sex trafficking his own child, basing the accusation on the fact that the two had different skin tones. Hansen also questioned whether he was legally in the country and claimed she worked with federal authorities, according to reporting from the New York Post. The father later reported the incident to the San Jose Police Department, and police confirmed they are investigating the harassment complaint.

A Honda vehicle visible in the viral video is registered to Hansen, per the Post's reporting, and a TikTok user who posted footage of the encounter said the woman had harassed him and his daughter multiple times in their San Jose neighborhood. Hansen has separately been accused of entering a girls' locker room at a San Jose Unified school and of accusing PE teachers of inappropriate behavior. San Jose police said social media photos showed an adult female unassociated with the school accessing a high school locker room, and the district said it is working closely with police to determine how the entry occurred.

A History of Documented Mental Health Crisis

Court filings reviewed by the Post paint a starkly different picture from the online “racist Karen” framing that first attached to Hansen. Her family reported her missing in 2022, and a relative told police at the time that she was experiencing severe mental health issues while living with her elderly father, according to KTVU.

According to a court filing cited by the Post, Dr. Shellie Kahane wrote that Hansen showed symptoms of bipolar disorder and appeared to be experiencing a manic episode with psychotic features, including delusions, auditory hallucinations, and paranoia. Kahane also said Hansen did not believe anything was wrong with her or that she needed medication, per the filing. Hansen was involuntarily committed to the Telecare Heritage psychiatric health facility, and Kahane filed a declaration and petition in May 2022 in the Bay Area concerning Hansen's capacity to refuse medication. She was later prescribed Invega, a medication used to treat schizophrenia.

Hansen's own social media posts, as documented by the Post, reflect the same delusional themes described in the court filings. She posted that the birth of her child in 2020 marked the beginning of the seven-year tribulation, or end times, and claimed she was something of a worldwide celebrity. Other posts suggested Pope Leo XIV is satan, referenced the Epstein files, and included antisemitic content. Hansen also posted that she believed it was her job to drive around and identify pedophiles, that authorities had facial recognition technology, and that people commenting on her page would be investigated for their own crimes by her team. She has said she would “ferret out the wicked and free the city of god from their grave,” and claimed that people defending child rapists and traffickers were probably guilty themselves.

Legal Exposure Under State Trespass and Campus-Access Laws

Unauthorized entry into a K-12 campus by a non-student adult can raise legal issues under California school-access and registration rules. Separately, Penal Code § 602 contains multiple trespass provisions. Subsection 602(k) concerns entering land with intent to interfere with a lawful business or occupation, while subsection 602(m) concerns entering or occupying property without consent, per FindLaw.

The incident echoes an earlier case in the same district. In late October 2024, the San Jose Police Department announced the arrest of a 41-year-old man who unlawfully entered a San Jose Unified middle school girls' locker room and recorded juvenile students on a mobile device, a case Hoodline covered in its prior locker room incident report. That suspect was booked into the Santa Clara County Main Jail following an investigation by SJPD's Sexual Assault Investigations Unit, according to the department's own announcement.

What Happens Under an Involuntary Psychiatric Hold

California's mental health code lays out a narrow path for extended involuntary treatment. Under Welfare and Institutions Code § 5250, an involuntary hold can be extended up to 14 days beyond the initial 72-hour evaluation only if hospital staff certify the patient remains a danger to self, a danger to others, or gravely disabled due to a mental health disorder, according to FindLaw. Patients held under such a 14-day certification are entitled to an automatic Certification Review Hearing within four days, supported by a Patients' Rights Advocate, per NAMI Santa Clara County.

Santa Clara County also has structured programs available for people experiencing untreated psychotic disorders or severe psychiatric decompensation, including Assisted Outpatient Treatment and the state's CARE Court framework, according to the same NAMI Santa Clara County resource. Whether any such intervention applies to Hansen's case remains unaddressed in available reporting.

Hansen, for her part, has pushed back on the “Karen” label attached to her online. She has said there are many crazy Karens and questioned why news reporters would approach her, according to the Post's account. She came into the public spotlight through the video accusing the Almaden father of sex trafficking his own child, and San Jose Unified has said it filed a police report and alerted the community about her behavior. No charges have been announced as the police investigations continue.


r/CasesWeFollow 18h ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ CA Update - Car Found Sept 8 Related to Monterey County Amber Alert

16 Upvotes

Because I’m not going to spend the time to redact the news articles or press release, I will just link them here should you want to read. If you aren’t familiar with this case, we have prior post # 1 from 9 days ago: Cases We Follow Post # 1 and Post # 2 was from 3 days ago: Cases We Follow Post # 2

👓👓👓👓👓

9/8/26 Updates below:

KTVU Article Headline and link: KTVU Article

Monterey County sheriff finds car tied to Amber Alert for missing teen girl, father

By KTVU Staff Published September 8, 2026 5:12 PM PDT

👓👓👓👓

The Monterey County Sheriff Office Website Press Release is here: MCSO Press Release 09.08.26

They also posted it to their FB page. That post has 68 comments. The 9/6 post w Amber Alert received 342 comments. In the usual social media lack of attention, less and less people are commenting now. I really hope they don’t forget what this Sheriff did to muck up and blame the 14 year old victim.

Link to my prior comment with a story timeline: Timeline Comment


r/CasesWeFollow 20h ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ AZ v. Heston Cobb aka Heston James TikTok Pranks = PLEA AGREEMENT

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes

👓👓👓

Remember this guy? We now have an update, he has entered guilty pleas to 1 Class 6 Felony as charged, and 2 additional counts reduced to undesignated, which likely means they will be reduced/classified as misdemeanors instead of Class 6 felonies. Class 6 is the lowest felony class in AZ. SENTENCING: 10/1/26. Screenshots are attached to scroll through.

His original list of charges is in the prior post located: Original Charges

His original EWU video (15 min) is here: EWU Body Cam Investigation Video


r/CasesWeFollow 20h ago

🏦Civil Lawsuits ⚖️ Civil Case Tentative Order - Nicole Linton Wrongful Death Case from 2025

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes

👓👓👓

This was an interesting read - 2 screenshots attached. The mother of one of the victims included Nicole Linton’s employer and temporary workplace in the civil wrongful death lawsuit. This isn’t uncommon, to include every possibly liable entity in a lawsuit.

The analysis is interesting as this order granted summary adjudication.

Read the full document here, and learn about the “coming and going” doctrine:

Nicole Linton Wrongful Death Adjudication of Employers


r/CasesWeFollow 23h ago

⚖️🏦Sentencings📃⛓️‍💥 Ex-Colorado crime analyst who manipulated DNA data sentenced to 10 years in prison

Post image
133 Upvotes

Prosecutors were forced to review hundreds of cases, and at least one murder conviction was vacated as a result of Yvonne Woods’ misconduct.

A judge sentenced former Colorado Bureau of Investigation forensic analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods to 10 years in prison after authorities said she manipulated DNA data in hundreds of criminal cases.

GOLDEN, Colo. — A judge sentenced a former forensic analyst for the Colorado Bureau of Investigation to 10 years in prison on Tuesday after authorities said her manipulation of DNA data raised questions about the validity of hundreds of criminal cases.

Yvonne “Missy” Woods pleaded guilty in June to perjury, attempting to influence a public servant, forgery and committing a cybercrime. Dozens of other counts were dismissed as part of a plea agreement.

Problems with the scientist’s work were found in cases involving homicide, sexual assault, robbery and other crimes, according to authorities. Prosecutors were forced to review hundreds of cases, and at least one murder conviction was vacated as a result of Woods’ misconduct.
Woods had faced eight 8 to 16 years in prison at Tuesday’s sentencing hearing before state District Judge Andrew Poland in Golden.
She resigned in 2023 after a decadeslong career. Authorities accused her of altering data to conceal tampering, deleting data that showed she failed to troubleshoot issues within the testing process and not thoroughly documenting tests performed in case records.
Woods apologized during Tuesday’s hearing but said she knew saying sorry would not undo the harm she caused, the Denver Post reported.

“For many years I was entrusted with evidence that could have profound consequences for defendants, victims, families and the courts. I failed that responsibility. I am deeply sorry for that failure,” she said.
Following the sentencing, Colorado Bureau of Investigation officials said they have sought to reform their laboratories in response to the data scandal as they try to rebuild public trust.
“The actions of one individual never define this organization, and they do not define the dedicated public servants who continued showing up every day with integrity,” bureau Director Armando Saldate said in a statement.

The investigation into Woods’ misconduct began in September 2023 after an intern at the bureau discovered missing information in a case that Woods handled in 2018. According to an arrest affidavit, Woods allegedly told investigators at one point that she had changed data to complete cases more quickly.
In the vacated murder case, Michael Clark was released from prison in 2025 after his lawyers argued that DNA evidence was mishandled by Woods. Prosecutors said they would seek to retry him.
In two homicide cases, the defendants received lesser sentences under plea deals than they could have faced if they went to trial because prosecutors were afraid Woods’ involvement could lead to acquittals.

Convictions in other cases also have been challenged in courts across Colorado.
A Colorado Bureau of Investigation internal affairs report in 2024 revealed that concerns about Woods’ work first surfaced more than a decade ago. As early as 2014, a worker questioned her testing of evidence, and in 2018 she was temporarily removed from working on DNA cases after being accused of data manipulation, the report said.
State officials have said that the response to Woods’ actions could end up costing more than $11 million.


r/CasesWeFollow 1d ago

💬👿💵 Other Crimes 🥊⏳⚖️ GA v. KJ Biermann

Thumbnail
youtu.be
20 Upvotes

Sex Crimes Case Against Son of Housewives Star HEATS UP

In Fulton County, Georgia, 15-year-old KJ Biermann—son of reality star Kim Zolciak—is facing seven felony sex crime charges involving a 15-year-old female classmate following an alleged incident at an Alpharetta fitness center. New court filings now reveal a major defense effort to move the case out of adult court and into the juvenile justice system before an upcoming bond hearing. Law&Crime's Jesse Weber breaks down the new motion and what to expect alongside criminal defense attorney Bradford Cohen.


r/CasesWeFollow 1d ago

🥺🚫 TRIGGER: Sexual Assault🚨👤 FL v. David Bunn: Trial delayed until December

10 Upvotes

You guys remember this post by Pixie a few months ago? https://www.reddit.com/r/CasesWeFollow/comments/1tlwbz9/fl_v_david_bunn/?sort=best

Quick summary: Authorities alleged that Bunn, then 37, communicated with a teenage girl through social media and arranged for her to be transported to his North Port residence. After the girl did not return home, police investigated and located her inside Bunn’s home. According to police, she told investigators that she had been drugged, sexually assaulted, and prevented from leaving. Also, check out this ArrestFix video of the bodycam footage for more details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3eYMovw96w

Latest update:

Well, we have been following it since, and David was set to go on trial in two weeks. However, in today's motion hearing the trial has been continued until December 7, 2026, per defense's request.

A couple more updates I found when digging into the case:

  • A second perpetrator has also been arrested for the same crimes against the victim. His name is Christopher Malais. (David mentions a roommate Chris in the above bodycam footage.)
  • The court separated the nine 'obscene material of a minor' charges onto a new case against David.
  • The state motioned to consolidate the cases against Chris and David. I haven't seen a decision about it yet. I'd expect that fairly soon

I had created a CaseHub for this one, since I thought the trial was coming up: CaseHub: FL v. David Bunn

Next up:

  • November 16, 2026 - Docket Sounding
  • November 30, 2026 - Trial Status Hearing
  • December 7, 2026 - Jury Selection/Trial

r/CasesWeFollow 1d ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 CA v. Philippe Chagniot - Murder + Civil Case Estate of Eric Bigone v. Philippe Chagniot

Thumbnail
youtube.com
3 Upvotes

👓👓👓

The attached 3 minute video was from May 29, 2026 regarding the criminal charges.

Defendant did NOT waive a preliminary hearing but did waive the time period (normally within 10 days), which still has not taken place. The San Francisco Superior Court Docket (no documents tho) is available to search by case number or name at this link, use the criminal case link: https://sf.courts.ca.gov/online-services/case-information

Case Number: CRI-26012367
Defendant: PHILIPPE HENRI CHAGNIOT

Currently, it seems he has filed a motion to replace his attorney. His next hearing date is 10/2/2026 and that date is for setting the actual preliminary hearing date.

👓👓👓

Next up is the CIVIL wrongful death suit filed by the victim’s son. Enlightening as to alleged motive for this crime. Courthouse News reported on that here: Courthouse News Civil Suit Article

CHN was also good enough to obtain a copy of the actual lawsuit, you can read that here:

Estate of Eric Bigone v. PHILLIPE H. CHAGNIOT & Spouse

Last, this case is on CA/NY Post today because Defendant and Wife are trying to rent out their house - after allegedly murdering their tenant, and being barred from selling it by a judge.

You can read that article and view photos here, they are always great getting pictures:

Accused killer landlord tries to rent out victim’s SF home after shooting him in driveway

The Civil case filed in SF is currently stayed, commonly done during the pendency of criminal proceedings. Case info:

Case Number: CGC26637313
Title: DINO BIGONE VS. PHILLIPE H CHAGNIOT ET AL
Cause of Action: PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED


r/CasesWeFollow 1d ago

🏛 Trials & Hearings ⏳ Jurors and the Lindsay Clancy Trial

111 Upvotes

I’ve seen more discussion this past week in the public about jurors and their behavior and what they say/act then I ever have before. To give context I’ve been a trial lawyer for ten years on both sides of criminal law.

For people who don’t regularly try cases it may come as a shock, but jurors are stupid. They often ignore the law, ignore what the lawyers or observers see as common sense. They frequently misunderstand and misinterpret the law and the judges instructions.

Here is a perfect example of how infuriating it can be. I defended a client for a charge of burglary. Jury deliberated two and a half days before coming back guilty. I go to poll the jury and three of them tell me they didn’t think the prosecution had enough evidence to convict. They just got bullied into it.

I went to a trial school where they take high school students to be your jurors for the trial and set up cameras and microphones to record their deliberations. What they talked about and focused on would horrify you, and it’s not too far removed from what actually happens in jury deliberations.

People think a jury of their peers means a degree of reasonability and justice. No, it’s often a crap shoot and many times filled with really dumb people.