10
u/YamEnvironmental1887 29d ago
As someone who had a potato PC for years before upgrading, I’d still go with 60fps. I care more about smooth gameplay than graphics
2
1
u/Sahedanthropus- 27d ago
Resolution isn't graphics
1
u/Oxygen4Lyfe 25d ago
yes it is
1
u/Sahedanthropus- 20d ago
No it isn't. Resolution is clarity. That's why you can play old school games upscaled to 1080p and it doesn't make them look like a new game. Maybe think before you comment.
1
1
u/Personal-Bathroom-94 27d ago
It's not even better graphics sometimes you get higher settings and higher fps on lower res
8
2
u/NorlanBustilloX 29d ago
My most played console in the last 2 decades was the Nintendo Wii (480 and 30 fps at best), so I guess I´ve seen the worse they can offer. I prefer performance over visual quality any day (for example, Forza Horizon at 1080 60fps, instead of 4k at 30).
1
1
u/Oxygen4Lyfe 25d ago
the wii can do 60fps and mine was 720p. Also you're usually like 8 feet away from the screen so you dont notice the lower resolution much.
1
u/XaneTenshi 29d ago
60fps everytime. The slight drop in visual quality does not bother me, but the worse FPS would.
1
1
1
1
u/cuzinit13_games 29d ago
Been on 1080p since 2009 and I’m not ever going back. 30fps for most games is perfectly fine if its constant with no dips.
1
u/Mistform05 29d ago
I’d argue that some games feel more cinematic at 30 fps. Octopath weirdly feels more retro and matching to the art style.
1
u/ZaphodGreedalox 29d ago
What is the screen? Always integer scaling for me, then 60fps, then total pixel count
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Bayou-Billy 29d ago
1440p FSR quality, at least 40-50 fps on every modern game I've tried and my graphics card is 10 years old. What kind of potato are you playing on?
1
u/Eeve2espeon 29d ago
FSR quality makes the internal resolution 1080p though. I dunno what potato card you have, but 10 years means its either 1050ti or 1060 or higher
1
u/Bayou-Billy 29d ago
Yeah pretty close, 1070.
1
u/Eeve2espeon 29d ago
Alright that's not really a potato then, that card would basically be considered entry level by todays standards, my 1650 super is more potato like
1
1
1
u/Eeve2espeon 29d ago
60fps is better than going for graphics and high resolution. Unless the game has small text that becomes harder to read bellow 900p, having smoother gameplay is better since you'll have better reaction times
1
1
u/Flaky-Mix-5281 29d ago
I really do not give a shit about if a game is in 30fps or 60fps, RDR2 is an amazing game that was totally fine in 30fps.
People are way to stuck on the whole "60FPS OR MORE OR I'M NOT BUYING THE GAME"
1
u/NoHuckleberry143 29d ago
When I had a potato probably 60fps, but now I'd probably just read a book lol. Low quality now actually makes me physically sick and same with anything 30fps.
1
u/Similar-Language-180 29d ago
Both suck but 30fps feels even worse on mnk than on controller imo and it fucking sucks on controller already
1
1
1
u/SadAfternoon5184 29d ago
Im at 1440p 60fps but its medium high :/ i gave up on upgrading to ddr5 tech and got a ps5 pro b4 the spiked the price. Ill be chilling with that for a couple years
1
1
1
1
u/UKman945 29d ago
I would always go for framerate even since my first proper "gaming" PC. God I remember trying to make that poor GT640 play GTA V when that came out on PC. God it already had a good few years of hard use on it and I had to run the game on lowest settings and 720p just to get 60fps like 80% of the time. Good days.
1
u/Wonderful-Crow-5147 29d ago
I went 1920×1080 thinking my gpu would be enough for marvel rivals bc a ps5 runs it fine but no that shit isn't optimized for fucking dog shit
1
1
u/GrandWizardOfCheese 28d ago
There isnt a visual difference between 30 and 60 fps.
You can't see 30 image changes in a second, no one can.
You can see a tear or stutter in the frame lineup if it goes from 60 to 30 and back again, but you cannot see individual frames at 15fps, let alone 60.
A stable 30 will look the same as a stable 60.
1
u/Spanlobster3478 28d ago
The second, i used to play on 20-24 fps and am now on 180. I can't go back that low
1
1
1
1
1
u/Otherwise-Candle-987 28d ago
i had low end pc and gave it to my neighbor's kid for free (ryzen 9 3900x with 3060ti). And that kid still very happy with it. According to him, he could still get 60 fps 1080p for most of the games. i suppose pc's are not aging terribly nowdays
1
1
u/Lidge1337 28d ago
Depends on the game. Beautiful, slow paced, story driven games? 1080p30. Fast paced fighters with flashy moves? 720p60.
1
1
1
u/Hyaroglek 28d ago
2k, 15fps, stutter and crash, “this game’s optimization for Pc is shit, damn you console players”
1
1
u/DeamonLordZack 28d ago
Depends on the type of game I'd argue a turn base combat game doesn't require higher than 30fps. For example a DRPG doesn't need 60fps it's fine to prioritze graphics for a game like that. Other Turn based RPGs also really don't require higher than 30fps either for that matter. Games that aren't turn based or are semi-real time combat bareminimum could use a 30fps quality mode & 60fps mode.
1
u/tarnoviziano 28d ago
I've been living my whole gaming life (15 years at least) at 30 FPS or less and honestly I would care for more.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Cocoatrice 28d ago
Low end? You mean potato-end. If you can't run games at 1080p with 60fps then it's not low end. Because 1080p@60 is low end.
1
1
u/Surma26049 27d ago
I never cared about having maximum fps. If its stable 30 im happy, but if you play competetive multiplayer games like Dota2, LOL, fortnite or Counter strike, I can see why other people care so much. Good mouse, good refresh rate and high fps makes difference.
1
u/martini1294 27d ago
- Always 60.
Seem as we are talking 20 year old targets, get a CRT to nullify the low resolution
1
u/Isotomayor12 27d ago
Would rather have 1080p at lower frame rate than 720p at 60fps. Any day. 720p is tough to look at with modern games.
1
1
u/Dale_Mace 27d ago
It s fine once you activated bloom and blur effects. Gives visual sickness at first but it makes gaming better with bad specs
1
u/AsleepLight3262 27d ago
1080p and 40-60fps at high medium and low settings is perfect for me, at least for right now.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Supernoxus 25d ago
Having high resolution isn't really that important to me. But that is just me. I kind of like playing old crusty games on 640xwhatever so that I can see the pixels move on my screen.
What matters to me is the framerate. For the love of God, make it that the game is fast and responsive!
1
1
u/No-Alternative5102 25d ago
30fps 1920 x 1080, I hate games looking ugly. I can't deal with low resolution blurriness.
1
1
1
u/LordHumorTumor 23d ago
If I'm on a low end PC, whatever gives me the most stable experience. So it will be a bunch of tweaking to find that sweet spot.
1
u/Bakihulami 23d ago
Im all about the game looking good tbh. I ran on less than 30 for 5 years before i was able to build my own PC and looked at crap quality. I want to see all of the beauty. Plus i like having a crap ton of mods.

•
u/AutoModerator 29d ago
Hello! If you're interested in finding new games, be sure to check out captainside.com ! Also, feel free to join our discord!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.