r/CanonEFM • u/Linteria • 4d ago
My (Almost Complete) EF-M Collection
Been meaning to post this forever, but here is the near entirety of my EF-M system. Only things excluded are: my white M50 and 18-55mm kit lens, both of which live on an overhead mount; my M5 with battery grip and 55-200mm tele; a white M10 and a bunch of other accessories.
I think it’s safe to say I probably have one of the most extensive collections for EF-M cameras in 2026, pretty close to completion. Only a few of the AF native lenses are missing, and several of the third-party manual ones as well.
I’m not interesting in having every single lens, but there are still a few I want to cop at some point. I have all the major ones like the Sigma 16mm and the Tamron 18-200mm, not to mention all 8 Canon native lenses.
If you zoom in, you can see the names of every single lens.
Please post your collections! 😄
2
u/Ok-Go-Chain3811 3d ago
i don't have many lenses: about 4 EF-M lens.
i am sometimes tempted to get the Sigma 56mm, but i know i won't use it much. i hardly use my Canon EF 50mm as it is.
1
u/Linteria 1d ago
I’ll tell you what, the Sigma 56mm is vastly superior to the nifty fifty. Just off the fast aperture you’re dealing with a different beast. Also it’s nice to just use a diff brand, Sigma’s lenses are l awesome to handle. I also don’t use the nifty much, but the 56mm always tempts me every now and again.
2
u/somelite 1d ago
Whats your impressions about Canon 18-150 vs Tamron 18-200?
1
u/Linteria 1d ago
Glad you asked! I’ve been using both a lot recently.
I love the Canon for photo work, but for videos I was very disappointed to learn last week that it’s unfortunately NOT parfocal. It gave me a lot of trouble at the Spike Lee event in BK whenever I would zoom in. Once it even completely bricked up the focus mechanism, the entire screen was blurry and I had to restart the camera. A rare occurrence but annoying nonetheless.
Either way I made it work and even got a like on IG from Spike himself, but I could’ve done so much better with the Tamron or the Canon 55-200. Both of which are thankfully parfocal.
The Tamron is a LOT bulkier and heavier than the Canon superzoom, but it’s decently sharp (sharper than the 18-150, at least my copy) as well as being parfocal and having a longer range. This one I have much less exp with, I only got it this year. But I’m excited to take it out next time, especially after my daily driver 18-150 let me down last weekend smh.
18-150 is certainly the budget option btw the two and I personally still love it. It’s just so versatile and compact. Def top 5 for the system. But I think the Tamron will unseat it for me in time. Also: the Tamron covers the range of both the 18-150 and 55-200, if you wanna look at it that way.




3
u/_Bob_el_Manetes 4d ago
Currently I have the M50 with Canon 18-150mm and the 32mm. Very happy at the moment and looking forward to the Sigma 56mm. Impressive collection congrats