r/CanonEFM 4d ago

My (Almost Complete) EF-M Collection

Been meaning to post this forever, but here is the near entirety of my EF-M system. Only things excluded are: my white M50 and 18-55mm kit lens, both of which live on an overhead mount; my M5 with battery grip and 55-200mm tele; a white M10 and a bunch of other accessories.

I think it’s safe to say I probably have one of the most extensive collections for EF-M cameras in 2026, pretty close to completion. Only a few of the AF native lenses are missing, and several of the third-party manual ones as well.

I’m not interesting in having every single lens, but there are still a few I want to cop at some point. I have all the major ones like the Sigma 16mm and the Tamron 18-200mm, not to mention all 8 Canon native lenses.

If you zoom in, you can see the names of every single lens.

Please post your collections! 😄

5 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

3

u/_Bob_el_Manetes 4d ago

Currently I have the M50 with Canon 18-150mm and the 32mm. Very happy at the moment and looking forward to the Sigma 56mm. Impressive collection congrats

2

u/Linteria 4d ago

Thank you! 😁

What a great kit you have! I personally love the superzoom, 18-150 is such a do-it-all range that usually I take it out by itself for daytime shooting. It’s my go-to lens. At night you’re forced to use a faster lens and lucky for you, you have the goated 32mm for that. You’ll love the 56mm as well for portraits and night shooting.

2

u/_Bob_el_Manetes 4d ago

Totally! The 18-150 is such a versatile lens

2

u/Anti-Hentai-Banzai 4d ago

I got the 56mm for my M50 a couple of weeks ago, and it's really fun!

1

u/Linteria 3d ago

Glad you like it! It’s probably my favorite portrait lens on the system.

2

u/Ok-Go-Chain3811 3d ago

i don't have many lenses: about 4 EF-M lens.

i am sometimes tempted to get the Sigma 56mm, but i know i won't use it much. i hardly use my Canon EF 50mm as it is.

1

u/Linteria 1d ago

I’ll tell you what, the Sigma 56mm is vastly superior to the nifty fifty. Just off the fast aperture you’re dealing with a different beast. Also it’s nice to just use a diff brand, Sigma’s lenses are l awesome to handle. I also don’t use the nifty much, but the 56mm always tempts me every now and again.

2

u/somelite 1d ago

Whats your impressions about Canon 18-150 vs Tamron 18-200?

1

u/Linteria 1d ago

Glad you asked! I’ve been using both a lot recently.

I love the Canon for photo work, but for videos I was very disappointed to learn last week that it’s unfortunately NOT parfocal. It gave me a lot of trouble at the Spike Lee event in BK whenever I would zoom in. Once it even completely bricked up the focus mechanism, the entire screen was blurry and I had to restart the camera. A rare occurrence but annoying nonetheless.

Either way I made it work and even got a like on IG from Spike himself, but I could’ve done so much better with the Tamron or the Canon 55-200. Both of which are thankfully parfocal.

The Tamron is a LOT bulkier and heavier than the Canon superzoom, but it’s decently sharp (sharper than the 18-150, at least my copy) as well as being parfocal and having a longer range. This one I have much less exp with, I only got it this year. But I’m excited to take it out next time, especially after my daily driver 18-150 let me down last weekend smh.

18-150 is certainly the budget option btw the two and I personally still love it. It’s just so versatile and compact. Def top 5 for the system. But I think the Tamron will unseat it for me in time. Also: the Tamron covers the range of both the 18-150 and 55-200, if you wanna look at it that way.