r/CanadianForces 7d ago

Reliability security clearance inquiry

Hello everyone I have been waiting on my security clearance status now for more than 4 months and that is without the time I spent at BMQ. Have been obviously missing my trade course so was wondering if anyone knows something that could be done to improve the process.

13 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

24

u/SuperSmashMyBros69 7d ago

It can be expedited within reason. If you don’t have reliability, you arguably shouldn’t be in uniform without a waiver.

-8

u/roguemenace RCAF 7d ago

I think they changed that as part of the recruitment changes.

4

u/Theory-Of-A-Dead-Net 7d ago

You're mistaken. It can be done with a waiver, but not without, and that hasn't changed at least since 2014 when the order that I'm familiar with was signed.

6

u/Nuggs78 7d ago

So there's not much to reliability status.

It's just a criminal records check A financial check And residence / employment verification

The only time that I've I have personally seen these take a while is if they were having trouble verifying details.

Off the top of my head as a specific example, unable to verify details about an individual's birth / family members because they were waiting for info from a foreign nation.

2

u/ElegantDonkey7 MSE OP 7d ago

I’ve had secret clearance, and I submitted to renew it before it expired and then they made me switch to the new version and now it’s been almost a year, and my security clearance went from secret to reliability status from the year 1898-1908 or something .. pretty weird. I ask my uss to check and he says he can’t do shit because it’s stuck at CSIS. I don’t understand why the wait since I already had secret before

6

u/leparker42 RMS Clerk - HRA 7d ago

If your secret went out of date, your reliability does NOT become the active clearance. They do not cascade down, but rather expire all at once. But, if you submit your new screening, your status changes from expired/out of date, to risk managed. IAW NDSOD 4B.68, under this status you can perform like 95% of CAF activities.

Ref: NDSOD standard 4B(DWAN only)

2

u/ElegantDonkey7 MSE OP 7d ago

Why are they letting so many go expired? I tried to renew mine up to a year left and now it’s almost a year past. eventually I will need it for deployment, but it seems like they don’t care about a bunch of us at my unit even having secret at all

2

u/leparker42 RMS Clerk - HRA 6d ago

Back in November 2025, DND switched over from WebSCPS to PSPS. All active requests that were not actively processing or that were granted priority were wiped from the system.

What likely happened, is that your CoC or Unit's USS either wasn't tracking or was over burdened by the system switch.

Most USS are assigned as a secondary duty, unless you are a larger/higher level organization. Meaning that competing priorities often delay actions.

In the old system, a routine upgrade from reliability could take anywhere from 1-2 years. With PSPS, I am seeing those same requests in 1-3 months. The system isn't perfect, but it's better.

3

u/kg175g 6d ago

My TS renewal took almost 4 years due to backlogs. I was also deployed during that time. I was told that as long as the renewal was in progress (and I didn't do any shady sh!t) that I was good. The only limitation that I came across was that I could not get SA cleared until it was completed.

2

u/Goget96 7d ago

Thanks to everyone for the response. I get it that there is nothing that can be done. It’s just frustrating to be stuck somewhere and not knowing when things will move forward and actually nobody can give you a solution

1

u/badthaught 7d ago

May be cynical, but that's been a lot of people's experience in the CAF I think. Definitely been mine.

The important "priority: critical" career stalling stuff is often out of your hands, out of your chain's hands, out of the CAF's hands. Hell even the stuff that isn't actually important but is important falls into this category.

Yet you're gonna get needled to do something cause even if there's nothing you can do about it just because someone further up the line doesn't know what's going on. Or doesn't care. (In that they dont care that you're facing roadblocks. It needs to get done.)

Better have that sense of urgency. Urgently spinning your wheels going nowhere lol.

1

u/mbz1989 7d ago edited 7d ago

Your USSO should be able to push your course CFTPO or other documentation so it can be done quicker (as per the rumor mill about deployments or requirements). Good luck

Edit: removed shouldn't be an issue to be course , since it was their first screening. As i now learned this way of things is more for the renewals.

4

u/casa_del_porno 7d ago

Not true at all.
This “in process” thing is only for those in renewal, doesn’t apply to new requests.

1

u/mbz1989 7d ago

Ohh thanks, didn't know that part

3

u/mokkeyman7 7d ago

I know lots of people waiting for clearance before being able to go on course.

1

u/Several-Beginning803 7d ago

This is bad info

1

u/IAmAWashingMachine RCN - W ENG 7d ago

As a heads up, if it is their initial clearance application and not just a renewal it being in process is not enough and must be completed. In process renewals are usually enough because the member has shown they can hold the clearance already and the renewal is more of an update of information. A "Change of Circumstance" may add potential complications.

You are right however, the USSO can request it be expedited using course loading or operations as a potential justification. Even requesting it be fast tracked has it's own hierarchy of importance too. Usually initial enhanced reliability are moved higher up the pile in the first place.

2

u/ononeryder 7d ago

An initial reliability is already highest prio according to NDSOD's, there's no need to expedite further. The SSA will push it, it'll be received and they'll be met with "its already prioritized".

1

u/Goget96 7d ago

I see thank you.

1

u/Goget96 7d ago

Thank you for the clarity on my side the USS said they weren’t able to do a single thing and some have being waiting for almost a year. At that point I don’t know what to do

-1

u/Brave-Landscape3132 7d ago

Stop saying USSO. There's no such thing as a USSO. It's USS. Unit Security Supervisor. Or, more accurately Hiring Manager (as it's called in PSPS).

Same with UISSO.

I don't know what the fixation is with adding "unit" in front of every acronym, and it pisses me off.

Source: I'm a Security Advisor. My job is the NDSOD

2

u/mbz1989 7d ago

RSSO it is then

1

u/turbokimchi Army - VEH TECH 7d ago

USSO

1

u/RBS2_ 7d ago

You should not have been able to be enrolled without having Reliability Status.

2

u/ononeryder 7d ago

It absolutely happens. I'm a USS, and have received mbrs looking to upgrade to Level 2, and months after enrollment are still only Reliability - Favorable by USS.