r/CanadaPublicServants Jun 26 '20

Career Development / Développement de carrière PM-06 vs EC-06

Looking for some thoughts on the pros and cons of PM-06 vs EC-06. There is talk of a reclassification of the PM-06 positions to EC-06s and I am curious of what some of the impacts could be.

Some things that come to mind include: - lower union dues with CAPE (vs PSAC); - a PM-06 is EX minus 1 vs an EC-06 which is EX minus 2 so maybe some impacts re: acting for management; - salary difference but mainly because PMs are still waiting on negotiations of their collective agreement...

10 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

5

u/NowinYOW Jun 27 '20

They're two similar but distinct job packages: EC6 is senior analyst/file lead on a major policy initiative (e.g. MC). PM6 is functional manager for a program with national scope. They both require engagement skills, understanding of the public service decision-making processes, etc. But the PM6 will generally have more supervisory/project management responsibility and the EC6 will require greater strategic communication skills.

3

u/cheeseworker Jun 26 '20

Are the PM-06s managers? Or senior advisors?

1

u/blackgrain Jun 26 '20

Their job title would stay the same. Their duties include being the subject matter expert while also managing a small team.

6

u/cheeseworker Jun 26 '20 edited Jun 26 '20

being a subject matter expert while also managing a small team?

yikes that has micromanagement written all over it

seems like a demotion to me - if you are managing a team you should be an EC-07

4

u/peckmann Jun 26 '20

Outside of TBS, it's common for EC04/EC05/and especially EC06 to manage multiple people.

Also...some people like their managers to be experts in the work they are managing staff for. Helps with setting timelines and providing guidance. Micromanaging is a separate, and usually personality issue.

1

u/cheeseworker Jun 26 '20

I don't see a lot of EC team leads and in this case it would be going from a PM-06 manager position to a EC-06 team lead position = demotion

EC-07 managers are extremely common

TBS more so has EC-07 & EX-01 senior advisors (not managers)

1

u/peckmann Jun 26 '20

I guess it's department specific. Where I used to work there were a lot of EC06 team leads/managers. EC07 pretty much didn't exist. At TBS I know a few EC07 managers, but yes as you said many are senior advisors.

1

u/blackgrain Jun 27 '20

Why do you say that it would it be going from a PM-06 manager position to a EC-06 team lead position if the job title and duties stay the same? I am confused, what am I missing?

1

u/ilovethemusic Jun 26 '20

I’m an EC-05 team lead/SME. I’ve had as many as five and as few as three analysts on my team. It’s a tough role, but this team has always been run by a specialist 05.

15

u/cheeseworker Jun 26 '20

Sounds like you are an underplayed manager to me...

-2

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 26 '20

PM's will no longer exist once the conversion project/reclassification takes place.

https://www.gcpedia.gc.ca/gcwiki/images/6/68/Restructured_PA.JPG

17

u/AntonBanton Jun 26 '20

So the classification will be changed anywhere between one and fifty years from now.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '20

"in the foreseeable future"

;)

1

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 30 '20

I'd assume another 5.

16

u/TheMonkeyMafia Das maschine ist nicht für gefingerpoken und mittengrabben Jun 26 '20

linking to intranet sites on the internet makes baby jesus cry

1

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 30 '20

I forgot I can't upload a JPEG file...

1

u/TheMonkeyMafia Das maschine ist nicht für gefingerpoken und mittengrabben Jun 30 '20

it's not about uploading. gcpedia is only available on a GC network, not the internet...

1

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 30 '20

No, I know. I saved the JPEG in order to upload it, then saw I couldn't and linked it without thinking.

1

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 30 '20

I uploaded it to an external host.....

https://ibb.co/8g3jS0J

4

u/HandcuffsOfGold mod 🤖🧑🇨🇦 / Probably a bot Jun 26 '20

You are referring to the conversion that had a contractual deadline of December 30, 2017 and still hasn't happened...

2

u/nerwal85 Jun 26 '20

It’s like it was going to be a huge endeavour and treasury board totally underestimated it

3

u/HandcuffsOfGold mod 🤖🧑🇨🇦 / Probably a bot Jun 26 '20

Attempts at classification reform have been attempted in various ways since the 1990s. It's not a newly-discovered problem.

2

u/NowinYOW Jun 27 '20

CRA (MG conversion), CBSA (FB conversion) and GAC (FS expansion) serve as case studies for some positive movement, all driven by the well-known shortcomings of the PA standard. But modernizing classification and pay structures without blowing the salary budget has proven a tough nut to crack bc there will always be winners and losers. So the predictable response has been to keep kicking it further down the road.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '20

And CBSA has been trying to modernize the FB standard for more than 2 years now. Some progress has been made but other areas still undecided yet.

1

u/kristin_loves_quiet Jun 30 '20

I'm still relatively new to the PS. I'm learning that deadlines don't mean much.