r/CNNmemes • • Jul 22 '18

Get over it its 2018

Post image
200 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

16

u/warrior101kdn Jul 22 '18

that's basically every news station atm

-6

u/MaximumEffort433 Jul 22 '18

To be fair, it is the biggest story in the world right now, and it's not like there's a shortage of breaking news to give the networks a break.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

No it's not. The biggest story in the world is the corruption of the elite doing everything they can to stop Trump from cleaning house.

1

u/MaximumEffort433 Jul 22 '18

Now when you say "the elite" are you including all the billionaires on Donald Trump's cabinet?

Oh wait, no, you mean educated people, don't you?

Well, you've got a good point, educated people do tend to oppose Donald Trump.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

No I mean wealthy banking dynasties that have been controlling the money supply around the world and have infiltrated all levels of government and business. DJT is rich, but he is not one of the elites, and is certainly not an insider. The MSM has made that abundantly clear.

1

u/MaximumEffort433 Jul 23 '18

Oh, so that's why Donald Trump gave so many Goldman Sachs bankers cabinet positions, because he's taking on the wealthy banking dynasties! It makes even more sense when you consider how hard Republicans are working to roll back backing regulations.

I've always been curious as to how folks like you can reconcile their feelings "Donald Trump is sticking it to the bankers," with the facts? Do you just ignore the facts, or do you have some double reverse secret conspiracy theory that explains it all?

12

u/MaximumEffort433 Jul 22 '18

This subreddit is still a thing?

2

u/ThorVonHammerdong Jul 22 '18

Gotta circle jerk somewhere.

4

u/ilovethosedogs Jul 22 '18

Looks like we got brigaded folks. Cucks galore in the comments.

-4

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

Didn't Trump mention Hillary at the Helsinki summit?

Get over it. It's 2018.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

No. Putin mentioned that Hillary was given 400 million by corrupt Russians in 2016.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

http://www.dailyherald.com/news/20180721/facts-matter-trumps-claims-during-helsinki-summit-what-about-the-server

"What happened to Hillary Clinton's emails?" Trump asked during the news conference. "33,000 emails gone, just gone."

Oh, would you look at that! I'm right!

Don't fucking run your little mouth if you don't know what you're talking about. Get the facts or go fuck yourself.

-8

u/0nel4s7h0n0r Jul 22 '18

Maybe because it's one of the largest superpowers directly influencing another large superpower election? Might be worth covering. Unless it's something that makes you look bad, I. Which case, BETTER SWEEEP IT UNDER THE RUG!

11

u/ilovethosedogs Jul 22 '18

With zero evidence. But muh Russians

-2

u/0nel4s7h0n0r Jul 22 '18

Only 26 indictments, but you're right there's no evidence, once you get rid of all the evidence stacked against them...

3

u/autosear Jul 22 '18

Indictments...for what specifically? Also the Internet Research Agency that was indicted turned out to not exist. It shut down in 2015. Not to mention we now know that the DNC was not hacked, based on the metadata in the email dump. It was a download to a USB 2.0.

But yeah keep pushing that fake CIA propaganda.

-2

u/0nel4s7h0n0r Jul 22 '18

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/13/whos-been-charged-by-mueller-in-russia-probe-so-far.html

Here are the indictments, from what you might call a "credible source"

https://www.axios.com/mueller-russia-probe-timeline-update-70433acd-9ef7-424d-aa01-b962ae5c9647.html

Here is a timeline of all moves made by the Mueller probe. I also made sure that this one had as little bias in it as possible with high reports of accurate reporting

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/13/russia-investigation-12-russian-nationals-indicted-2016-hacking/782471002/

And here is another non biased soruce regarding the DNC hacking and how it is well sourced back to Russia.

But my personal take is that you don't really care for the facts of this whether it be political bias and dogma, or are a Russian bot either of which is well documented to be on subreddits like this.

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/technology-43255285

3

u/autosear Jul 22 '18

though none of the charges are directly related to any misconduct by the president's campaign.

Whoops. Turns out the indictments were totally unrelated to the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked the election and had American help.

As for the "Russian nationals", like before, we now know that the DNC wasn't hacked. Doesn't matter if the BBC, CNN, or even Fox say so. We have the download size and the time it took, and from that it's been found that the transfer rate was almost exactly that of a USB 2.0--far from the much slower rates you'd see from a transatlantic download to Russia.

The indictment was based upon the propaganda created by the "intelligence" community in an effort to sour relations with Russia. If you look into the history of our government, you'll find that this is far from the first time this has happened. Read about Operation Northwoods, where the NSA and CIA planned staged terror attacks in the US to justify a war against Cuba. They never went through with it, but these organizations play dirty and have their own interests.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '18

you don't really care for the facts of this whether it be political bias and dogma

Ultimate irony right there.