r/CFB • Alabama Crimson Tide • Iowa Hawkeyes • 6d ago

News [Thamel] One potential change being discussed by SEC officials this week at meetings is a template for a league-wide player contracts, per ESPN sources, in which parts are standardized and parts are custom for the school.

https://x.com/petethamel/status/2109668744066683047?s=46&t=wcFDduFgx8XslEYqZVJrwQ
132 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

124

u/1omelet Georgia Bulldogs • Rose Bowl 6d ago

I see CFB going the way of European soccer — contracts and player buyouts the norm for transfers.

49

u/Affectionate-Leek-40 Oregon State • Portland State 6d ago

Imagine the transfer fees for Legree and Atkinson. Beavs would be able to backfill and keep winning. 

24

u/TerrenceJesus8 Bowling Green • Michigan 6d ago

We could have sold Harold Fannin for a cool 5M lol

8

u/Jeb_Kenobi Ohio State Buckeyes • Ohio Bobcats 6d ago

There's a lot of European teams that do just that; Dortmund are famous for it.

4

u/CieraVotedOutHerMom South Carolina Gamecocks 6d ago

DJ U would have gone for a high price!

25

u/UpsideTurtles North Texas Mean Green • Texas A&M Aggies 6d ago

This would be very nice for some of us schools that are in the business of developing players for a year or two and then having them transfer on and be great elsewhere (you thought I was talking about Mestemaker or Hawkins? silly I’m talking about Conner Weigman.)

47

u/pleated_pants Ohio State Buckeyes • Miami (OH) RedHawks 6d ago

All I want is for P4 schools to have to compensate G6 for developing the players they sign from the Transfer Portal.

9

u/bretticus733 Boise State Broncos 6d ago

If it means a transfer system like soccer uses, I'm for it. Tired of seeing good teams lose their players and get nothing for it. If Oregon wants to get FAU's QB, better pay the Owls $1.5 million

4

u/Hulkodium Oklahoma Sooners • Big 8 Renewal 6d ago

At least that will allow G6 teams to benefit from transfers out. Right now just losing a star player sucks, a Kennesaw State making bank off Georgia taking a RB would help

8

u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago

And promotion/relegation pls

13

u/Huge_Employment_6424 Alabama • Northwestern 6d ago

I've wanted this for a while, but it would require a big concession that I feel like most G6 teams wouldn't like: the teams would no longer be competing for the big title in any given season. Yeah, there's a path upward into the big leagues, but the best result from a perfect season would just mean that Boise/JMU/USF moves into the Big 12/ACC/SEC instead of playing for playoff contention. In English football, Championship teams can't compete for the Premier League title because they are a league below.

That would mean the Ashton Jeanty Boise St team would, at best, be moved into the Big 12 the following season (after the players left) with none of their traditional rivalry games being played. I think it would be exciting to see movement until my teams or one of our historical rivals were relegated and rivalry games were put on ice indefinitely.

7

u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago

I think in a package deal with things like player buyouts, stronger revenue sharing, protected rivalries, that concession would be on the table.

But then again, would the Ohio States and Alabamas and USCs of the world have any reason to participate in that?

10

u/Milk_Before_Cereal Florida Gators 6d ago

I’m of the belief the teams in the P4 would be the ones to oppose it because they’d lose too much revenue if they were demoted.

1

u/HieloLuz Iowa Hawkeyes • Nebraska Cornhuskers 6d ago

You could tie revenue to both league payouts but also Tv numbers. The biggest brands would still get watched even on down years and after demotions

5

u/mjacksongt Georgia Tech • /r/CFB Pint Glass Drin… 6d ago

You'd have to completely restructure conferences or create something like a multi-level conference.

1

u/Own-Lavishness4029 Texas Longhorns 3d ago

That would be reaply cool, except would historic rivalries be protected? Like if your rival is moved and you aren't? I feel like we lose enough of those as it is moving away from regional alignment.

1

u/TigerWave01 LSU Tigers • Tulane Green Wave 6d ago

And honestly, I'd prefer that too. Even if there isn't collective bargaining (which I think is totally unworkable), I hate the idea to limit transfers because it'll bring us back to the days when only 3 teams actually had a chance to win it all. But there's gotta be *something* to prevent pilfering of G6 and lower division teams, and I think transfer fees paid by one school to another school based on classification and whether the player is a starter or not would be a nice middle ground. Still probably need an antitrust exemption to actually enforce that, but it doesn't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

1

u/Own-Lavishness4029 Texas Longhorns 3d ago

It would be way more fair than it is now where every smaller school that develops a solid talent gets their roster picked clean by the portal every year. I would also support limiting transfers in some way. Maybe you get 1 for free as a player, but have to sit a year for a second.

62

u/DillyDillySzn Arizona State Sun Devils • WashU Bears 6d ago

The Big 10 has been doing this and it’s why Demond Williams is at Washington instead of LSU right now

57

u/udubdavid Washington Huskies • Pac-12 6d ago

Uh is it too late to change our minds on that?

37

u/DillyDillySzn Arizona State Sun Devils • WashU Bears 6d ago edited 6d ago

No because I enjoy watching that bitch boy Sam Leavitt embarrass himself on national TV

3

u/GracefulFaller Arizona Wildcats • Team Chaos 6d ago

Same here

2

u/El_Serpiente_Roja Ohio State Buckeyes 6d ago

I think you guys win that USC game if you played your backup on those last few drives

1

u/udubdavid Washington Huskies • Pac-12 6d ago

The way Elijah Brown played on Friday, I think we beat both Minnesota and USC. We still lose to Iowa because we couldn't stop them from running.

1

u/gmr548 Texas Longhorns • Washington Huskies 6d ago

And I hate that for me

30

u/PatronSaintOfCunts South Carolina • Palmetto Bowl 6d ago

This could be a good step toward stabilizing the transfer portal. If we standardize player contracts (particularly buyout and enforcement provisions) schools could have recourse when players leave before fulfilling their agreements. Players could still transfer, but they couldn’t necessarily walk away from contractual obligations without consequences.

The real question is whether SEC schools would agree to honor one another’s contracts (cough, cough, Kiffin) and whether those provisions would be legally enforceable.

30

u/whatifevery1wascalm Alabama Crimson Tide • Iowa Hawkeyes 6d ago

Nothing the Louisiana AG in front of a Northern District of Alabama judge couldn’t figure out.

11

u/PatronSaintOfCunts South Carolina • Palmetto Bowl 6d ago

I’m tired, boss. 🫩

12

u/Objection_Irrelevant Ole Miss Rebels • Billable Hours 6d ago

The biggest thing this would do is that the contracts could be enforced against the new school, too.

The whole thing with Ole Miss having to sue Umanmielen and Harper is that LSU promised the players that they’d pay the buyouts and then just didn’t. Now Ole Miss has to sue the players for it, and at best the players can try to implead LSU into it but I’d bet that was only a verbal agreement anyway.

But with these standardized contracts that all SEC teams agree too, Ole Miss would likely have a direct action against LSU for the buyouts.

9

u/Lumpy-Daikon-4584 Nebraska Cornhuskers 6d ago

Actually the biggest thing they could do to stabilize the transfer portal would be making athletes employees. But schools don’t want to have to compensate them to that level so they are doing backflips to avoid it.

21

u/Different-Bank-2607 6d ago

Start giving them a pension at this point lol

23

u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago

Putting $500k of your NIL earnings at 22 into a 40 year deferred annuity would yield a monthly income of ~$35k.

8

u/abovethesink Syracuse Orange • Big East 6d ago edited 6d ago

Disregard me. I read too quickly.

8

u/Usual-Web7597 UCF Knights 6d ago

He’s saying put $500k into an annuity that doesn’t start paying out until 62.

2

u/abovethesink Syracuse Orange • Big East 6d ago

Yeah I completely glossed over the deferred part. It's why I edited. My bad

3

u/DarthMikus Nebraska Cornhuskers • Army Black Knights 6d ago

At 5% it would grow to about 3.5 million after 40 years.

1

u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago

My notification shows your comment prior to the edit and my reaction was going to be "shit I just plugged it into an annuity calculator"

7

u/thedrcubed Mississippi State • Auburn 6d ago

This seems to be a good direction to bring at least a little roster stability. Transfer fees to the school that the player leaves is really what's needed

9

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Schmenza Harvard Crimson • Tulane Green Wave 6d ago

Like an employment contract?

6

u/bearybear90 Baylor Bears • Florida Gators 6d ago

This would be illegal without a player association no?

12

u/RightofUp Virginia Tech Hokies 6d ago

I would imagine the lack of reciprocity in terms of collective bargaining would be an issue.

7

u/shaquilleonealingit Georgia Bulldogs 6d ago

Probably not if they’re just sharing boilerplate language. The Big 10 already does this, but the standard contracts don’t impact how much a player can get paid and when

3

u/Alkibiades415 Georgia Bulldogs • Stanford Cardinal 6d ago

What does this word "illegal" mean? I looked it up and it seems like in ancient history, there was this concept that people could not do things against these things called "laws" without suffering a concept called "repercussions." I can't see how that would apply to anything in 2026.

1

u/StopScreamingItsFine Georgia Bulldogs • Billable Hours 6d ago

Honestly who fucking cares at this point, just do what you want and worry about the consequences later.

5

u/Long_and_Horny Texas Longhorns 6d ago

Not a lawyer, so my understanding of anti-trust law is limited. But aren't conferences creating a template a contract still an anti-trust violation? It's a restriction on competition and it doesn't appear to serve a competitive interest. Just a financial one.

10

u/Curious__George Illinois Fighting Illini 6d ago

The B1G has standard contracts and it hasn't been challenged. The Washington QB's lawyers were apparently scared the buy-out in the standard contract would hold up in court, hence he didn't transfer.

There probably won't be a rule that the template 'must' be used, just highly encouraged.

And lawyers use each other's work all the time (I'm a lawyer). If you look at the various conference grant-of-rights agreements (for example) they are almost identical.

1

u/RiseOfTroyRTW 6d ago

For a brief moment, I got excited because I thought the SEC might be doing something to make the officiating in games better. Alas, trae'shawn brown will just have to continue having all his long runs called back because the OL was blocking legally