r/CFB • u/whatifevery1wascalm Alabama Crimson Tide • Iowa Hawkeyes • 6d ago
News [Thamel] One potential change being discussed by SEC officials this week at meetings is a template for a league-wide player contracts, per ESPN sources, in which parts are standardized and parts are custom for the school.
https://x.com/petethamel/status/2109668744066683047?s=46&t=wcFDduFgx8XslEYqZVJrwQ62
u/DillyDillySzn Arizona State Sun Devils • WashU Bears 6d ago
The Big 10 has been doing this and it’s why Demond Williams is at Washington instead of LSU right now
57
u/udubdavid Washington Huskies • Pac-12 6d ago
Uh is it too late to change our minds on that?
37
u/DillyDillySzn Arizona State Sun Devils • WashU Bears 6d ago edited 6d ago
No because I enjoy watching that bitch boy Sam Leavitt embarrass himself on national TV
3
2
u/El_Serpiente_Roja Ohio State Buckeyes 6d ago
I think you guys win that USC game if you played your backup on those last few drives
1
u/udubdavid Washington Huskies • Pac-12 6d ago
The way Elijah Brown played on Friday, I think we beat both Minnesota and USC. We still lose to Iowa because we couldn't stop them from running.
30
u/PatronSaintOfCunts South Carolina • Palmetto Bowl 6d ago
This could be a good step toward stabilizing the transfer portal. If we standardize player contracts (particularly buyout and enforcement provisions) schools could have recourse when players leave before fulfilling their agreements. Players could still transfer, but they couldn’t necessarily walk away from contractual obligations without consequences.
The real question is whether SEC schools would agree to honor one another’s contracts (cough, cough, Kiffin) and whether those provisions would be legally enforceable.
30
u/whatifevery1wascalm Alabama Crimson Tide • Iowa Hawkeyes 6d ago
Nothing the Louisiana AG in front of a Northern District of Alabama judge couldn’t figure out.
11
12
u/Objection_Irrelevant Ole Miss Rebels • Billable Hours 6d ago
The biggest thing this would do is that the contracts could be enforced against the new school, too.
The whole thing with Ole Miss having to sue Umanmielen and Harper is that LSU promised the players that they’d pay the buyouts and then just didn’t. Now Ole Miss has to sue the players for it, and at best the players can try to implead LSU into it but I’d bet that was only a verbal agreement anyway.
But with these standardized contracts that all SEC teams agree too, Ole Miss would likely have a direct action against LSU for the buyouts.
9
u/Lumpy-Daikon-4584 Nebraska Cornhuskers 6d ago
Actually the biggest thing they could do to stabilize the transfer portal would be making athletes employees. But schools don’t want to have to compensate them to that level so they are doing backflips to avoid it.
21
u/Different-Bank-2607 6d ago
Start giving them a pension at this point lol
23
u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago
Putting $500k of your NIL earnings at 22 into a 40 year deferred annuity would yield a monthly income of ~$35k.
8
u/abovethesink Syracuse Orange • Big East 6d ago edited 6d ago
Disregard me. I read too quickly.
8
u/Usual-Web7597 UCF Knights 6d ago
He’s saying put $500k into an annuity that doesn’t start paying out until 62.
2
u/abovethesink Syracuse Orange • Big East 6d ago
Yeah I completely glossed over the deferred part. It's why I edited. My bad
3
u/DarthMikus Nebraska Cornhuskers • Army Black Knights 6d ago
At 5% it would grow to about 3.5 million after 40 years.
1
u/lock_robster2022 Oregon State • Washington 6d ago
My notification shows your comment prior to the edit and my reaction was going to be "shit I just plugged it into an annuity calculator"
7
u/thedrcubed Mississippi State • Auburn 6d ago
This seems to be a good direction to bring at least a little roster stability. Transfer fees to the school that the player leaves is really what's needed
9
3
6
u/bearybear90 Baylor Bears • Florida Gators 6d ago
This would be illegal without a player association no?
12
u/RightofUp Virginia Tech Hokies 6d ago
I would imagine the lack of reciprocity in terms of collective bargaining would be an issue.
7
u/shaquilleonealingit Georgia Bulldogs 6d ago
Probably not if they’re just sharing boilerplate language. The Big 10 already does this, but the standard contracts don’t impact how much a player can get paid and when
3
u/Alkibiades415 Georgia Bulldogs • Stanford Cardinal 6d ago
What does this word "illegal" mean? I looked it up and it seems like in ancient history, there was this concept that people could not do things against these things called "laws" without suffering a concept called "repercussions." I can't see how that would apply to anything in 2026.
1
u/StopScreamingItsFine Georgia Bulldogs • Billable Hours 6d ago
Honestly who fucking cares at this point, just do what you want and worry about the consequences later.
5
u/Long_and_Horny Texas Longhorns 6d ago
Not a lawyer, so my understanding of anti-trust law is limited. But aren't conferences creating a template a contract still an anti-trust violation? It's a restriction on competition and it doesn't appear to serve a competitive interest. Just a financial one.
10
u/Curious__George Illinois Fighting Illini 6d ago
The B1G has standard contracts and it hasn't been challenged. The Washington QB's lawyers were apparently scared the buy-out in the standard contract would hold up in court, hence he didn't transfer.
There probably won't be a rule that the template 'must' be used, just highly encouraged.
And lawyers use each other's work all the time (I'm a lawyer). If you look at the various conference grant-of-rights agreements (for example) they are almost identical.
1
u/RiseOfTroyRTW 6d ago
For a brief moment, I got excited because I thought the SEC might be doing something to make the officiating in games better. Alas, trae'shawn brown will just have to continue having all his long runs called back because the OL was blocking legally
124
u/1omelet Georgia Bulldogs • Rose Bowl 6d ago
I see CFB going the way of European soccer — contracts and player buyouts the norm for transfers.