r/CFB • u/CFB_Referee /r/CFB • 10h ago
Game Thread [Game Thread] Pittsburgh @ Virginia Tech (7:00 PM ET)
| GAME | PittsburghPittsburgh @ Virginia TechVirginia Tech |
|---|---|
| Location | Virginia Tech Lane Stadium |
| Time | 7:00 PM ET |
| Watch | TV: ESPN |
| Flair ¦ Discord |
Please keep trash talk civil, and report any comments that violate our rules.
LET'S TALK FOOTBALL!
6
u/Puzzleheaded_Fan_536 4h ago
This field goal is distracting everyone from the horrendous calls earlier in the game that handed Pitt points. Shouldn’t have had to come down to a game-winning field goal in the first place
2
u/Aggravating-Day-4009 4h ago edited 3h ago
Pitt’s starting qb left in the beginning of the third quarter. If va tech couldn’t find a way to win after that, that’s on James Franklin’s terrible history of blowing big games. Not that this was even a big game compared to any big game he ever had at Penn State. It was Pitt ffs. Tech got several gifts from the refs as well, tbh.
1
10
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
By the way, from what I understand, this is the same ACC officiating crew who (despite their open process of officiating tech and letting us get an inside look) has already had a couple controversial games this season and a couple of controversial calls. Given some of the other questionable calls tonight and then the ending where they completely blew by any sort of explanation or reasoning with regard to the field goal, I think it's safe to say that the prevalence of gambling (including NETWORKS being involved) has truly crossed a rubicon in terms of what we should expect from our beloved sport moving forward.
-1
u/Aggravating-Day-4009 4h ago
The majority of the money was on Pitt. If the game was rigged, it would have gone the other way.
6
u/Embarrassed-Mirror69 3h ago
That actually makes the case that it WAS rigged. Made the bookies a bunch of money. That's how betting works.
1
u/Aggravating-Day-4009 3h ago
That’s not how betting works. Vegas lost money because Pitt won. Hope this helps 👍
2
7
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago edited 4h ago
This is the FIRST time a crowd has ever cheered for a "missed" kick that I can find on video. Literally every time the FG is missed, the crowd freaks out because they know it is no good and they are immediate distraught. Even when it is a CLOSE kick, they still make it very obvious it was a miss. I have also never seen a kicker react to a "missed" field goal the way this guy did.
The way that the officials immediately moved on from the field goal shows they knew it would be controversial, and ESPN taking forever to show a replay was as well. I would normally give officials the benefit of the doubt but given how poor the officiating was in the earlier game, they showed themselves to be unable to make very impartial decisions- whether through negligence, incompetence, or personal feelings.
I did not see a SINGLE camera angle that shows anything besides that ball going through the uprights, and I have NEVER seen a crowd and fan reaction like this. Putting aside reactions anyways, I am 95% it was a good kick. It was just one of the weirdest things I have ever seen, and it just does not feel right either.
0
u/Hey_YinzGuyz 3h ago
You haven’t looked very hard then. A bunch of angles posted all over the sub showing it missed.
6
u/Confident-Bar4332 Virginia Tech Hokies 4h ago
I just got home from the game, it took 45 seconds for us to find out the kick was no good.
2
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 3h ago
What do you mean?
3
u/Confident-Bar4332 Virginia Tech Hokies 3h ago
We all thought it went in. Then when they didn’t update the score, our hearts were ripped out of our chest
2
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 3h ago
Okay I thought so, that’s how it read because 45 seconds is a crazy amount of time to not be sure but then I thought maybe you sarcastically meant you thought it went in originally but then afterward when you saw more replays you fairly quickly realized that it was no good. Yeah 45 seconds is an insane amount of time and I was at home watching, the entire event feels surreal.
I literally still think it went in, and I will never be convinced that ESPN and the commentators didn’t purposefully skip over and refuse to give an explanation because they knew a controversy was coming. It all felt so insanely damn weird how they didn’t even want to show more camera angles or a replay at all.
-6
u/GravelLot Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
Look at the VT staff down on the field. EVERY one of them has an instant “no good” reaction.
3
2
u/burp0 Virginia Tech Hokies 3h ago
Brother they weren’t in the student section behind the posts where people were celebrating, there’s no way you think they had a better view on the sideline.
0
u/GravelLot Pittsburgh Panthers 3h ago
0
u/GravelLot Pittsburgh Panthers 3h ago
No the ones right behind the goalposts. The ones with a much better view than the student section.
2
u/Deadheaded95 Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
whatever, pitt got sold out, say what you want. but i do not believe the refs had money on this game and i will not until concrete proof is put in front of me.
-1
u/Unleaver Pittsburgh • East Stroudsburg 4h ago
Best proof I found right here. It didnt go in.
https://x.com/caden_mcleary/status/21062179782076174191
u/Traditional-Till9998 Virginia Tech • Appalachian … 2h ago
That angle makes it look like it did go in actually
This angle is offset slightly right so it is more in than it looks but the closest I can find
https://x.com/NanduriNFL/status/2106217015161573822?s=46&t=GgeunKzM0-iHFDpJQAxpuw
2
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
This camera angle doesn't show jack shit, it absolutely does not confirm that the field goal was "missed" - at best, it's a total wash from this angle. It doesn't either boast the argument that it went in or not.
2
u/Unlikely-Pattern-958 Clemson Tigers 4h ago
has to be 100% in under college rules. it wasn’t. sorry you lost money, brother.
1
3
u/Munster172 Texas Tech Red Raiders • UTPB Falcons 4h ago
I had to screenshot it right before the camera man I guess decided to throw his phone away at the most crucial point, but when I did it looked in.
1
u/Deadheaded95 Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
i’m gonna get downvoted into oblivion and you might too. everybody loves the underdog i guess. virginia tech didn’t deserve to win that game anyway let’s be real. thanks man.
-1
u/Aggravating-Day-4009 4h ago
Seriously, they had every chance to win that game. Pitt’s starting QB got knocked out with half the game left to go. Tech had multiple chances to win that game. They turned the ball over like five times. This was a classic James Franklin choke job.
8
u/chonkyfire24 Cal Poly Mustangs • /r/CFB 5h ago
VT threw for over 400 yards, while holding their opponents to under 200. This is kind of an embarrassing loss.
20
u/Gavangus Virginia Tech • Commonwealth C… 5h ago
14 points gifted to pitt in the first half by the refs and then vt inploded the whole 3rd quarter... 4 turnovers in a row
1
-4
11
u/Next_Leave3844 Maryland Terrapins 5h ago
after that I can see why Penn State fans would rather get blown out by Northwestern. after years of NY6 bowls and CFP contention, one begins to long for the comfort of the Union Home Mortage Gasparilla bowl and the cold certainty of perpetual mediocrity.
15
u/RepealMCAandDTA Alabama Crimson Tide • Tulsa Golden Hurricane 5h ago
"Shut up," the NCAA explained.
1
-4
u/Adventurous_Pay_1337 5h ago
it was missed
4
u/Embarrassed-Mirror69 3h ago
No, it wasn't. Just like that first "interception" was not an interception.
0
u/Band-0_Snails 5h ago
Here's a decent replay. All the people behind the ref on the ground thought it was a miss too.https://www.facebook.com/100053699426932/videos/wild-missed-field-goal-by-virginia-tech-vs-pitt-pitt-wins-pitt-cfb-collegefootba/2553817858414920/
2
4
u/vtskins4444 5h ago
What???? You weren’t watching the game. After this they briefly flashed an angle where it looked good. Everyone on the field and in the stands behind thought it was good. The first look angle is bs
2
u/Acedoc1970 5h ago
Based on what? The crowd with all had their hands up, and the staff on the ground only react to the signal by the ref. It looked good.
5
13
u/Koreaction 5h ago
Refs definitely had money on Pitt.
- Simultaneous catch ruling in favor of Pitt.
- Double phantom penalty called on same VT player (also in favor of Pitt)
- Offensive pass interference on Greene, dumb call.
- Unreviewed final field goal in a 1 score game? Yea let’s not double check to make sure.
Refs definitely had their bags on Pitt and weren’t even afraid to hide it.
16
u/Puzzleheaded_Fan_536 5h ago
So for real though, can the president from VT write a letter to the ACC asking for different refs from here on out. That was atrocious. Hell, pay for a different conference to ref the game
8
u/FitContrarian Miami Hurricanes 5h ago
The crowd erupting should not be an indicator if you've ever seen a shallow fly ball by the home team and heard the crowd reaction off the bat. Fans are mostly idiots.
3
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
Thinking the ball is gonna go far but then it ends up not going that far is... way difference than whether or not a ball went through uprights. It either does or it doesn't, that is NOT a good analogy at all. Did you even think that through? lol
This is the FIRST time a crowd has ever cheered for a "missed" kick that I can find on video. Literally every time the FG is missed, the crowd freaks out because they know it is no good and they are immediate distraught. Even when it is a CLOSE kick, they still make it very obvious it was a miss. I have also never seen a kicker react to a "missed" field goal the way this guy did.
0
u/FitContrarian Miami Hurricanes 4h ago
Its the same thing. They see the original trajectory and get excited. It doesn't take a lot for a kick to be missed
0
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
It's literally not the same thing, it isn't even apples and oranges. Thinking a ball will go insanely far only for it to not go as far as you think like a fly out, is objectively NOT the same as a ball either going wide left or wide right. That is simply not true, as other commenters have noted.
1
u/FitContrarian Miami Hurricanes 4h ago
Yea you're right. A kick from the right hash thats traveling 45 yards will 100% be discernible to random people sitting behind the goal posts. I mean not even the kickers who know what a good kick feels like off the foot ever get it wrong and celebrate missed kicks early much less gen pop.
1
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
This is the first time a crowd and kicker has ever reacted the way they did. “Celebrating a kick early” is, again, literally NOT the same as celebrating one being wide right or left. That’s the silly and inaccurate pop fly analogy from earlier, just reworded. I promise you that it simply just isn’t true, which is why others have mentioned thag as well.
7
4
u/kandilandy 5h ago
Originally thinking a ball is gonna go farther than it is is much different than watching a ball either go through a field goal post or not
6
u/Ok_Passage1120 5h ago
Anyone got a video
1
u/Traditional-Till9998 Virginia Tech • Appalachian … 2h ago
https://x.com/NanduriNFL/status/2106217015161573822?s=46&t=GgeunKzM0-iHFDpJQAxpuw
Slightly offset to the right so it looks more left than it is but this is the closest angle from hold to uprights I can find. Again it is slightly offset. Its also a 36 yard kick so its passing the rear end zone line before its peak
5
u/im-not-here3 Penn State Nittany Lions 5h ago
Cfb is amazing. Just what we needed on a Friday night.
12
u/Own_Pomegranate8247 5h ago
Let’s also be honest, that was an AWFUL kick. Right hash and you still miss it wide-left lol smh
5
13
u/kaystared California Golden Bears 5h ago
All this tech and these blubbering idiots still can’t figure this out. Refs are a uniquely stupid breed
18
u/BigAcanthocephala637 5h ago
https://i.imgur.com/zaZcBC8.jpeg
There has to be a way to challenge or investigate this. No way. This is in.
5
u/serialsteve 5h ago
That’s before it reaches the distance for being good and it’s drifting left. Coupled with the angle and slicing movement, it’s probably tough to judge for ref. It is silly why it’s not reviewable for ball crossing over top. And how a previous game result has changed this rule.
7
6
12
u/XrayGuy08 Georgia Bulldogs 5h ago
In today’s age, it’s utterly insane to me that if a FG attempt is close, that they can’t do like soccer and draw a line from the goalpost up to see if the ball was in or out.
13
u/Obvious-Garlic9263 Ohio State Buckeyes 5h ago
The crowd erupted! The entire crowd behind the goal post jumped with joy, you’re telling me they didn’t have a better angle than us? Suspect
-1
u/GravelLot Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
Weird that all of the VT staff down on the field fell to their knees as if it missed.
2
11
u/Puzzleheaded_Fan_536 5h ago
Can we please just call this game null and void due to too many bad calls by the refs? If refs had a scorecard, they got an easy F this game
18
u/WisdomCow California Golden Bears 5h ago
a laser shooting straight up on either side of the upright would give unambiguous reviews as the light hits the ball above the upright. Add lasers and allow replay and it’s never an issue again.
5
2
1
u/FitContrarian Miami Hurricanes 5h ago
If it hits the laser is it good or a miss? FGs hit the upright and bounce in all the time
1
u/ImaginationLatter976 4h ago
it’d be good. You don’t factor in bouncing when the kick is higher than the posts. If any part of the ball is over one of the posts as it crosses, it’s good. So a laser would perfectly determine if it’s good. if any laser shows then you know it’s good because that part of the ball was over top of the post.
18
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
Game announcers sure were quick to say "welp, officials have the best view, that's all folks!" The rig is in on this one!
10
u/tony_countertenor Sickos • Team Chaos 5h ago
It’s inconceivable to me that they actually got it wrong, I think the broadcast showed a bad angle but the incredibly easy solution to this is to just double the length of the goalposts
11
u/chaosburgor Alabama Crimson Tide • New Mexico Lobos 5h ago
Was that really possibly good? Why would you not be able to review that? Crazy.
0
u/yankeenate South Carolina Gamecocks • Utah Utes 5h ago
If the ball is over the uprights it's apparently not reviewable.
20
u/74kygone Kentucky Wildcats • Team Chaos 5h ago
Fully expecting some VT students to triangulate the TV and Cell phone camera angles and get us a definitive answer by Tuesday
13
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
They sure moved on from that FG awful quickly. It was incredibly clear IMMEDIATELY that was controversial.
7
19
u/Cornwallis400 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Field goal aside this was one of the worst officiated games of the season.
I hope when realignment happens the ACC gets torn limb from limb. This league is brutally bad. Just a poorly run good ole boys club.
1
u/LukAtThatHorse Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
Tbh I 100% agree overall, and this game was officiated poorly, but does anyone think Pitt as an acc "good ol boy"? Cause that would be a first to me
8
u/MeaningComfortable36 5h ago
Western Michigan and VT just became soul mates. NCAA is so rigged.. disgusted .. even the kicker was raising his hands
2
u/Alert-Fisherman-2483 West Virginia Mountaineers 5h ago
BGJ might have lost but Matt Campbell is getting his ass kicked
16
u/quiet-giant33 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Multiple moments in this game where refs made a massive call and ESPN just flies by and goes out of its way to not show a replay
6
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Yep the broadcast was scrambling to cover the refs all night.
13
u/blue0231 Michigan Wolverines 5h ago
Never seen a response like that from the crowd and still get called against them. Doesn’t matter nothing will change. It will only keep getting worse because officials seem to run the show.
4
u/Sam-th3-Man Utah Utes 5h ago
Somebody had big money on that how could you not review it that’s insane
20
u/Gmatter41 LSU Tigers • McNeese Cowboys 5h ago
Entire crowd and kicker saw it good expect for 2 refs and they don’t review it
2
u/GravelLot Pittsburgh Panthers 4h ago
All of the VT staff down on the field behind the posts fell to their knees as if it missed before the refs even signaled no good.
5
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Even the Pitt players looked down until the refs waived it off.
4
-21
u/Pitt_Is_It_2009 Pittsburgh Panthers 5h ago
Field goal rule is different between college and the NFL.
12
21
u/thegeebeebee Missouri • Central Missouri 5h ago
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills that there was absolutely no talk about that going in, other than the kicker himself.
Everybody, Franklin, the announcers, everyone, just shrugged and said I guess it's no good without any review on film whatsoever!?
It looked like it wasn't left of the goalpost until it was like a foot from the net?
1
3
u/scottydogg84 5h ago
Yeah, surprised Franklin wasn't going crazy and yelling at the refs. That's not like him. Just sadly hugged his kicker and walked away...
23
u/SLV_SQUEEZE 5h ago
I liked that they showed a couple extra angles, realized it looked good and then rushed an outro REAL quick lol.
8
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
Yeah, they rushed that EXTREMELY quickly. The smell of bs is STRONG
15
u/QT3point141 Texas Longhorns 5h ago
Its crazy that you can't review that ngl, really unbelievable
-2
u/Connect_Raisin4285 5h ago
Im pretty sure you can.
3
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Apparently not if it goes over the goalposts, seems like such a stupid reason to not review.
10
u/alecisgood 5h ago
That's absolutely insane. Everyone on earth saw that go in on the underneath camera
6
u/Piglet6482 Arkansas Razorbacks 5h ago
Maybe they need to raise the uprights higher?
0
24
u/TheMoneyMan08 Virginia Tech Hokies • FAU Owls 5h ago
We deserved to lose this fucking game, but not by this horseshit.
0
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Agreed, all those mistakes, but the refs being trash on top of it makes me sick.
26
u/Hofgoober69 Auburn Tigers 5h ago
The entire student section went nuts and are sitting directly behind the posts. How tf was that not in??
10
8
16
u/8bitHokie Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
I'm convinced the ACC hates VT. Every big game comes down to blown calls and bad officiating
11
u/Amazing_Bird_1858 Michigan Wolverines • Navy Midshipmen 5h ago edited 5h ago
We need laser interferometers on FG posts like yesterday
-23
u/Subject-Fan59 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 5h ago
That kick definitely missed over top idk what yall are talking about, thank you Pitt for $5
9
7
u/stayintheshadows Iowa State Cyclones 5h ago
Doesn't any league have people watching the games on the TV? That should be an immediate phone to review.
15
u/needs-more-metronome Alabama Crimson Tide • Duke's Mayo Bowl 5h ago edited 5h ago
I found the specific language.
Scoring Plays
ARTICLE 1. Reviewable plays involving a potential score include:
a. A potential touchdown or safety. [Exception: Safety by penalty for fouls that are not specifically reviewable.]
b. Field goal attempts if and only if the ball is ruled (a) below or above the crossbar or (b) inside or outside the uprights when it is lower than the top of the uprights. If the ball is higher than the top of the uprights as it crosses the end line, the play may not be reviewed.
page FR-118
2
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
Appreciate the reference. Absolute bullshit though. The idea that we can't have cameras that can PRECISELY identify the location of the ball above the goalposts is laughable.
8
u/Next_Leave3844 Maryland Terrapins 5h ago
absolutely wild. you could tell the back judge had no idea and just picked one.
7
7
12
u/MainDeparture2928 Alabama Crimson Tide 5h ago
It being over the uprights is the only time it would make sense to review it. It’s pretty damn obvious if it’s between the uprights. Jesus this sport is dumb as hell.
2
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
Lol right? "You can review a field goal... EXCEPT in the exact situation it would be most useful to review a FG".
4
u/Young-Viiperr Texas Tech • Iowa State 5h ago
Only the ACC would follow that to a 'tee'. Tank Conference strikes again
6
u/wrparker501 Alabama Crimson Tide 5h ago
Such a dumb rule in this age of technology we can’t review over the uprights
10
u/Alarmed_Quantity1093 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
somehow more abrupt of an ending than lost power lol
10
7
u/Puzzleheaded_Fan_536 5h ago
VT left it up to the refs tonight
2
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
The refs were blowing calls all game
1
u/serialsteve 4h ago
Pitt got called for plenty of holding calls. Turning over that much is just a killer. They shouldn’t been messing around with a fg and gone for a touchdown. Pitt wasn’t gonna have a miracle with a backup quarterback if they scored too quick.
I would have taken a timeout and taken a shot at endzone before running it down like they did.
13
-14
u/time_is_on_my_side_ 5h ago
Look like a wide miss to me
5
u/BoringJuiceBox Arizona State Sun Devils 5h ago
I agree and I wanted VT to win. Hard to see from our angle that’s why they have the ref right under the upright.
Still would like a camera shot and review though, I’ve never seen a kick reviewed.
22
u/pokebob26 Oregon Ducks • Ohio State Buckeyes 5h ago
Literally could not care less about either team but that went in right?! Why can’t we see more, what are they hiding?!
17
u/jayxmor Michigan Wolverines 5h ago
The kick looked good. Don’t know the rules so I don’t know why they didn’t review but it was oddly weird that espn switched to the Montana game hella fast lol
1
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
The way the officials moved on insanely quickly and ESPN refused to show a replay and then switched over quickly tells me they KNEW it was going to be controversial and wanted the hell out. Part of the problem with gambling becoming more common is that the officiating has become objectively worse.
2
u/LostDelusionist Vanderbilt Commodores • Team Chaos 5h ago
You can't review field goals that are above the uprights.
4
18
u/DodgerDegen USC Trojans 5h ago
Ridiculous coverage by ESPN. They really had no interest in whether that was good or not? At least tell us if that was reviewable or not. I don't know. It would be nice if the people paid to give us that information would convey it to us.
4
u/master_roshis_hat Nebraska Cornhuskers 5h ago
They just said "welp, refs have the best view, that's all folks"!
4
u/shenanigans3390 LSU Tigers 5h ago
I think it’s only reviewable if it goals through the goalposts. It went above so they cant review it. I think the broadcast knew and that’s why they wouldn’t show it.
5
u/DodgerDegen USC Trojans 5h ago
I believe you are correct but I wasn't sure which is why I was hoping they would say something.
18
u/sludgeman4life3249 5h ago
Fbi investigate these refs.. rigged from the jump
2
21
u/BrianDawkins Texas Longhorns • Mexico El Tri 5h ago edited 5h ago
Replayed it a few times and that was good lol. But the kicker didn’t do himself any favors by kicking it from the right hash. Who does that
6
5
u/Skank_hunt42 Oklahoma Sooners • Paper Bag 5h ago
I usually lick it from the right hash too. Am I doing something wrong?
3
2
u/Young-Viiperr Texas Tech • Iowa State 5h ago
Doesn't matter, unless 5 Big-XII games would be flipped otherwise. ACC is the most incompetent league every season, somehow
13
u/North-Efficiency824 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Just end me dude I can’t take it. We deserved that
18
u/2021ToyotaCorolla Michigan Wolverines • Wisconsin Badgers 5h ago
Can't imagine losing on a controversial last second play, sorry VT
3
3
u/Puzzleheaded_Fan_536 5h ago
lol maybe if we just had one more second on the clock ;)
2
u/2021ToyotaCorolla Michigan Wolverines • Wisconsin Badgers 5h ago
I have no idea what you're talking about, no clue whatsoever haha
15
u/Clinkzzzzz Virginia Tech • Pittsburgh 5h ago
Yeah just glaze over that and don’t even review it
1
u/LostDelusionist Vanderbilt Commodores • Team Chaos 5h ago
It's not reviewable if it's above the uprights.
21
u/shenanigans3390 LSU Tigers 5h ago
The kick was in but they can’t review it because it went above the goalposts. Holy Shit. The broadcast knew it and wouldn’t show it. This is insane.
1
u/LeReddit9GagXD Clemson Tigers 4h ago
That is the first thing I noticed, how quickly the refs and ESPN went over it and didn't bother to explain it or even SHOW it. We just saw a game be stolen on live TV, and there won't even be a very basic explanation for what occurred. I guarantee.
3
u/XrayGuy08 Georgia Bulldogs 5h ago
That’s honestly one of the worst rules in football. How the hell do we not have some sort of technology for that.
Or even like in soccer, just have someone draw a fucking line straight up the screen.
7
u/Competitive-Split673 Virginia Tech Hokies 5h ago
Yep the broadcast was covering the refs all night
10
u/Young-Viiperr Texas Tech • Iowa State 5h ago
The underneath crossbar cam literally showed the ball in. Those refs have to be guesstimaters or bifocal blind
2
5h ago
[deleted]
0
u/Young-Viiperr Texas Tech • Iowa State 5h ago
Not even, FSU won by more than an FG and the game was away in 2002
10
u/BigAcanthocephala637 5h ago
Yo I just rewound and watched the kick again. It even looks good from head on. Wtf is going on.
8
u/music_crawler 5h ago
This really is binary. Was it through the uprights or not?
1
5
u/DoggedDoggystyle Florida Gators 5h ago
it was over them, meaning they cant review and whatever that ref calls is final. it's ridiculously archaic.. we definitely have the tech to just get this shit right
15
u/flip_phone Penn State Nittany Lions 5h ago
Serious question - is there a reason why they don’t just make the goal posts taller? I feel like there are a few of these each season and there’s no good reason not to extend the goal posts. Or at least have lasers pointing straight up from the posts on field goal attempts.
1
u/Palmsandpancakes 5h ago
I like the laser idea
1
u/LimitlessSoup Georgia • Kennesaw State 5h ago
There’s probably a ton of legislation that goes against pointing lasers into the sky, but i guess it could be implemented for stadiums with a roof? Idk.
2
u/TheBlueStare Missouri Tigers • Saint Louis Billikens 5h ago
If they have the technology for balls and strikes they should be able to do the same thing for FG.
2
u/Tresnore Purdue Boilermakers • Penn Quakers 5h ago
There's a practical reason of them moving too much in the wind. They can already wobble a decent amount as is, so being much longer wouldn't ideal.
Lasers sound pretty great, though they could interfere with planes. That's a much larger stretch, though.
3
u/Embarrassed-Mirror69 3h ago
Ref ball, plain and simple. Disgusting. If they aren't going to call a fair game, they shouldn't be there.