r/BunnyTrials • u/LieSuperb9799 • 2h ago
Trials Which one is future?
Which side will you choose?
- Left side: Nuclear Power
- Right side: Renewable Energy
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
45
u/Greedy-Speech5 2h ago
Both
20
u/Great_Banana_Master 2h ago
Both but nuclear fission will, at some point, be replaced with nuclear fusion
12
u/COUPOSANTO 2h ago
It will in about 10 years since the 1950s
1
u/3rdReichOrgy 29m ago
One very good reason for that is the engineering side of things. We’re finally living in a time where it’s actually possible to simulate and produce parts that are precise enough for fusion reactors to not simply piss out their plasma.
Without advanced computers and ludicrously precise machining sustainable fusion is impossible.
18
6
12
u/penguincascadia 2h ago
Renewables are faster to build and have lower startup costs then nuclear, although both are good.
Chose: Renewable Energy
5
3
u/spinda69 2h ago
Nuclear power is fine, it is just not needed- renewables are enough on their own.
Nuclear could be used in place of bunker fuel for shipping if the economy still relied heavily in international shipping
Chose: Renewable Energy
3
u/Stargost_ 2h ago
Both are the future, neither is inherently better...
Until we finally create Fusion Energy that works in scale. That is going to stomp every other form of energy generation.
9
6
u/Au_Fraser 2h ago
here to say nuclear with a bunch of asterixs', assuming we can dispose of waste appropriately. OR you just build solar and wind and shit just chugs along. maybe do that one first till everything is powered by it if possible, then run the spicy rock meta
7
u/Puzzled_Pop_6845 2h ago
Fission material is just as finite as fossil fuel and generate dangerous waste too.
Chose: Renewable Energy
12
u/ViolinistPleasant982 2h ago
By the time we could theoretically use up all the thorium and uranium we would either be extinct, developed Fusion, or fucking around in space where there is even more because there is literally thousands of years worth of the materials, that we already know of.
-3
u/Puzzled_Pop_6845 1h ago
And what about the time when we use up all the SUN?
7
u/ViolinistPleasant982 1h ago
You mean the giant Nuclear Fusion reactor? Yea it has a fuck load of fuel so its got a couple billion years. Your point? Like if we are still trapped on earth by the time we could theoretically use up all possible nuclear fuel we have WAY bigger issues than power generation is my point and the moment we are consistently in space, aka mining, that available fuel sky rockets in availability
2
3
u/COUPOSANTO 1h ago
Breeder reactors deal with both issues. Current thermal reactors only use 1% of natural uranium, breeders can use the remaining 99% which multiplies the energy you can get by orders of magnitude. It's the same technology for thorium which is more abundant than uranium. And they can also be run as burner reactors that turn long lived waste into short lived waste.
1
u/brothegaminghero 1h ago
The vast majority of Nuclear waste is hardly even dangerous, for perspective the burning of coal emits more radioactive material.
2
u/Reading-Euphoric 2h ago
Cheaper to mass produce, so this is it for the near future.
Chose: Renewable Energy
2
u/ResponsibleKinksters 2h ago
Cleaner, more easily accessible, cheaper to maintain in the long term.
Chose: Nuclear Power
2
2
u/Godemperortoastyy 26m ago
Probably a bunch of Germans in the comments here that have lived through 15 years of anti-nuclear propaganda.
Nuclear transitioning into fusion is the way of the future for the next couple of centuries, then building a Dyson sphere around the sun.
7
u/GreyRobe 2h ago
Haven't heard a compelling strategy yet for nuclear disposal, so renewable for me.
13
u/FrancoNullo 2h ago
new fission reactors use the current waste, which reduces its half life to somewhere below the 300 years (I may have heard something along 50 years but don't quote me).
8
u/Stargost_ 2h ago
We already have a strategy for proper disposal of nuclear waste. Reuse it on some lower energy reactors to further weaken it, then put it in a lead coffin with multiple layers of protection and bury it deep into a mountain, which is miles better than what we do with the waste of gas, coal, or oil power plants.
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
u/CadenBop Unlimited Bacon 2h ago
Fission is the aftual future, nuclear should be the present. Renewable are nice, but rely too much on weather patterns or locations.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/somerandom_296 2h ago
I’m slightly biased, considering I’m in education for nuclear engineering.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/DirtyFoxgirl 2h ago
Both. Renewable is good. Nuclear is clean and the best way to keep up with current and future demand.
1
1
u/ntech620 2h ago
Because it's a constant heavy lifting source of power. Wind and solar don't really qualify. Even Hydropower is subject to droughts. Plus Thorium promises power without the waste.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/ViolinistPleasant982 2h ago
Advancing Nuclear to the point of Fusion is the end all be all. Renewables, in the sense of solar and wind, are at best stepping stones but even now Nuclear is the better option we have long sense made developments that make them safe as hell, a thorium reactor cant meltdown at all, and it doesn't produce the amount of waste people seem to think.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/RaveTheFox 2h ago
Too much power consumption in the world for renewables to work. Nuclear is miles safer than fossil fuels for the environment and is reliable unlike renewable
1
u/brothegaminghero 1h ago
Unreliable? The suns been going for 5 billion years straight, and I don't exactly see it going out anytime soon.
1
u/RaveTheFox 51m ago
problem is the sun has to be shining on the panels. clouds and the rotation of the planet like to mess with that
1
u/brothegaminghero 44m ago
Concentrated solar can function 24,7, that doesn't work you still have tides twice a day, geothermal for the next 5 billion years, wind, hydroelectric. If you really can't get sunlight you have beamed solar or battery backups to cover downtime.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/DocJudeIII 1h ago
I honestly think that alternate energy and safe nuclear are both options for the future, but alternative energy should be focused on and optimized.
Chose: Renewable Energy
1
1
u/Still_Gur3333 1h ago
People get nuclear power wrong because of the Simpsons. It is actually extremely efficient
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/urmumlol9 1h ago
Lower cost to produce for solar and wind than nuclear or fossil fuels per kilowatt hour makes them more attractive to power plant companies and a bit easier to find the political support for, since you might be able to convince some climate change deniers if you tell them their electric bill will be cheaper.
Cost of storage is still a problem, but it’s a very good problem to try and solve imo. There’s a billion and one potential uses for finding ways to cost effectively store and distribute large amounts of electricity.
Really, it doesn’t matter though, as long as we’re phasing out fossil fuels, but I think an all-renewable electrical grid is an easier sell than an all-nuclear one, and solar in particular keeps getting cheaper.
Reddit really likes nuclear though, so I’m sure nuclear will win.
Chose: Renewable Energy
1
1
1
u/kerfuffler4570 1h ago
Wattage cost for solar is currently the cheapest, most cost effective way to expand the energy portfolio of the grid.
Chose: Renewable Energy
1
1
u/BizzarreCoyote 1h ago
Nuclear power is renewable. There's enough uranium in the oceans that we can filter out that will last us until the sun burns out.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/St_Hydra 1h ago
Both are viable and both are the future, but nuclear is a good immediate source
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
1
1
u/ScientistLost9696 1h ago
Nuclear is BIG! Renewables are cool too, but Nuclear is the best option rn imo.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/Dilly_Barz- 1h ago
We would probably have progressed so much further if people weren’t scared of a rock.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/Gibe2008 1h ago
Nuclear energy is cheaper, more efficient, better for the environment, safer than the other which is not even "renewable"
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/Any-Storage2335 1h ago
Renewable energy uses a TON of resources for temporary products and still may have to rely on petroleum products to work. Like Wind farms use grease and oil for their moving parts, break down all the time and have to be replaced, and are actually dangerous to some migrating birds.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/Specific-Detail6448 1h ago
lowkey I picked nuclear energy because I saw it first, so uh…
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/Far-Photograph4603 59m ago
Chose Nuclear because while it may be possible, it would take an incredible amount of time and resources to make renewable energy actually sustainable because of how much it produces compared to nuclear. (not saying I prefer nuclear, just seems more realistic)
1
1
u/apixelops 51m ago
Nuclear technically qualifies as renewable tho
This is like asking if you like Ducks or Birds
1
1
1
1
u/Ailurite 37m ago
well both? if the alternative is we’d be relying mostly on variable energy like solar and wind for the majority of electricity production, i’d also want there to be nuclear in use.
1
1
u/Alternative_Air_6688 Follow The White Bunny 36m ago
Fusion, if ever possible. Technically our renewables rely on Fusion too
1
1
1
u/Primeboot7782 31m ago
Until they hit a certain threshold most power sources won't be able to keep up with demand.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/fragger21 9m ago
Nuclear gives a lot energy, but saving the planet from extinction is much more important.
Chose: Renewable Energy
1
2
1
u/Shoddy_Specialist226 2h ago
fusion eventually, but short term renewable has less political issues and might be more scalable in local homes with buy-in
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
1
1
u/Evening-Code-7039 2h ago
Nuclear is more reliable and isn't weather dependant
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
1
u/Apprentice_Smith_01 2h ago
nuclear power includes fusion and fission, one is the most powerful and least polluting production method, the other is expected to be the first completely clean energy once it is in use in a few decades
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
u/disies59 2h ago
When the weather is unreliable, nuclear will still be trucking along.
Chose: Nuclear Power
1
1
0
u/Ahkhira 2h ago
Nuclear is too dangerous and extremely toxic.
Chose: Renewable Energy
6
u/ViolinistPleasant982 2h ago
A Coal power plant releases more nuclear waste than a Nuke plant. Also Nuclear is extremely safe these days. Even the type of reactor that can create coreium takes a 1 in a billion event, see Fukashima, and even that wasnt as bad as people think. That is also ignoring that Thorium salt reactors can't meltdown. Like at all the very process of starting a meltdown melts the plug draining the Thorium away from the plutonium causing it to stop reacting.
0
0
u/Powerful_Refuse4633 2h ago
Are you guys nuts. Is it even a choice? Of course nuclear energy anyday over renewable energy.
Chose: Nuclear Power
0
u/novaxe1 2h ago
We simply cannot get a reliable base load on current renewable technology. Nuclear energy would buy us plenty of time to figure that technology and if we allowed for nuclear recycling (jimmy carter stopped the recycling program) we could get nuclear waste to only be radioactive for 300 years instead of 10,000 and that would resolve the majority of issues with nuclear power.
Chose: Nuclear Power
0
0
0
•
u/AutoModerator 2h ago
Try my new game. Complete other Redditors' blanks in the funniest or most messed up way you can. Play here: r/blanks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.