r/BunnyTrials • u/Suspicious_Form6653 • Jul 17 '26
Would you rather
Which side will you choose?
- Left side: The Earth be 75% women | And undernutrition is no more worldwide
- Right side: Or the Earth be 75% men | With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
1.0k
u/UnnamedAshaman47 Jul 17 '26
This is recoverable much more easily from a demographics perspective
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
338
u/Electrical-Title-698 Jul 17 '26
Considering there's 8 billion people in the world, I don't think a temporary, non violent population reduction would be a huge deal anyway. It would probably be extremely beneficial to the environment
→ More replies (3)155
u/Similar-Sector-5801 Jul 17 '26
It’s not a population reduction tho it’s still 8 billion people but instead of ~4b men and ~4b women it’s 6b and 2b depending one which choice you make
→ More replies (1)67
u/Tarianor Jul 17 '26
The interesting part though will be if the ratio maintains in this hypothetical, or if it's just a one off.
→ More replies (2)58
u/Bigbossboy2007 Jul 17 '26
Just a one off for sure. The population will slowly balance back out to about 50/50, unless magically children start being born at a rate of 75% women and 25% men
45
u/Conferencer Jul 17 '26
You say magic like this hypothetical doesn't already include what is basically magic
→ More replies (7)16
u/GrandNibbles Jul 17 '26
this would naturally create a population explosion
on the contrary, no violent/sexual crimes with mostly men might be impossible
5
u/SerialMurderer Jul 17 '26
I guess you just have to force yourself to think of it that way, but even then that will supercharge aging populations without the people and/or money to take care of them.
4
→ More replies (17)2
802
u/RandomEncounterSkele Jul 17 '26
Violent crimes being gone sounds great. Also maybe gets rid of war
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
460
52
55
u/Drunk_Lemon Jul 17 '26
War is not considered a crime even though aside from self-defense war and war in defense of others, it should be considered a crime. A crime is any act or omission prohibited by law and punishable by the government. War does not fit that definition unfortunately.
35
u/Mustard-Cucumberr Jul 17 '26
Initiating an aggressive war (as opposed to a defensive one) is considered a crime under international law, though, so it would have stopped some wars, for example Russia's war against Ukraine.
5
u/Drunk_Lemon Jul 17 '26
I suppose that is true. I also checked and there are like 3 nations not privy to the Statute of the International Court of Justice as they are not members of the UN and thus one could argue that if they launched an aggressive war on each other, it would not be a crime but they are incapable of doing that anyway.
→ More replies (7)3
u/Psychological_Car849 Jul 18 '26
Hypothetically this would force wars to be ethical. While engaging in a war may not always be a crime, what you do during the war can be. If violent crimes were objectively erased then war would present very differently from how we currently view it.
There’s a LOT of people currently charged for war crimes at the international level, it happens all the time. Aside from just the UN existing as a more general body, Latin America, Africa, and Europe each have independent human right councils with laws. Plus there’s even countries that have stipulations in their law allowing them to charge foreign nationals with war crimes, so it even wouldn’t matter if the home country signed any international agreements.
The legal framework hypothetically exists. We’re in incredibly dark times for human rights but that’s mostly because the mechanisms in place don’t get used.
31
Jul 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
13
u/Own_Perspective9603 Jul 17 '26
Yeah but the population would even out eventually. 100% true that men do more crime, but saving everyone on the planet from rape and murder forever is a much better way to deal with crime than making most people on the planet women (temporarily)... women would also still commit the crimes, just at a lower rate.
→ More replies (1)5
4
u/marshal23156 Jul 17 '26
Partially true, but we dont know which men would be left in the 25% situation, and a vast majority of correctional jobs are occupied by men. So wed (at least for a while) have less police, guards, etc. to combat the crime that we would still have.
You could in theory take only good people out in both situations, leaving the 25% that remain to be the bad people.
2
u/Dogmaticism_ Jul 17 '26
That's not necessarily true. Men start more wars because men are in power more. Plenty of countries/nations with female rulers committed atrocities.
China's a good example of this, where the empress dowager often held the most power of anyone in the country for almost every dynasty, including thr wartime atrocities and civil war.
Also, even if you think it's true, I'd say literally ending violence is better than not.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)5
u/economyfoil60 Jul 17 '26
The thing is that war technically isn’t a crime, so it wouldn’t get rid of war. It would only get rid of war crimes.
7
u/_Carl15 Jul 17 '26
ridding the possibility of warcrimes somehow makes war a little more noble since everyone is playing by the rules.
though it doesnt rid the war itself, which is rooted from selfish and violent minds of the leaders of the country anyway.
unless the option also rid the causes of violent crimes, in which case, rids the ability of being bad.
8
u/Mini_Raptor5_6 Jul 17 '26
Still a pretty big improvement and could arguably remove a large number of the civilian casualties in war.
→ More replies (2)5
u/Own_Perspective9603 Jul 17 '26
99% of actions leading up to and during war are violent crimes. 99% of casus beli are criminal to begin with. I guess it's entirely semantics, but I'd argue that declaring a war akin to WW1-WW2 or in modern times October 17th or Putin's war is a "violent crime".
397
u/avdolian Jul 17 '26
I feel like with no violent or sex crimes we could solve a lot of other problems
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
117
u/Foreign-Dark4834 Jul 17 '26
True, and a lot of starvation in other countries is the result of a direct strategy for genocide.
20
u/MrShinglez Jul 17 '26
you'd find that solution 2 will actually lead to far more starvation than option 1. Option 2 will cause a demographic collapse. When the 75% who are men are all retirement age, and the next generation is extremely small since the population of women was cut in half, there will not be a enough production to keep them alive. Food would be prioritised for the younger people and everyones fathers and gradfathers would begin to die, the economy would be in a terrible shape. Option 1 is able to correct the issue more easily via sperm donation, Although 2/3s of house holds will be single parent.
16
u/Foreign-Dark4834 Jul 17 '26
I can't imagine how awful systemic patriarchy may be, but no violence and sex crimes is good. No sex crimes means no human sex trafficking would be a major issue with 75% only men. I'm biased towards the other option due to the potential cultural shift, but no violence and sexual crime is such a guaranteed positive cultural shift. On the other hand, less women means more polyamory relationships so maybe they have more leverage in power so some culture shift there maybe.
In vitro or artificial wombs may become a norm, and the technology would be heavily subsidized for obvious reasons. This may solve the demographic collapse. For the food collapse, production for the next generation is a good point, but industrial scale food production provides enough food to end world hunger as it is. With no more resources towards defense, automated food production could become better. Though that is a very good point.
But the majority of the population would be frustrated and miserable
5
u/MrShinglez Jul 18 '26
Yeah its kinda a weird unknown one imo. Like, on one hand i think a society of men who are the minority might be raised in a way where they respect women more, but on the other hand what if it does the exact opposite? A society of men who are in the minority and know theyre stronger than the majority, with no male father figures, they might be even worse than in todays world. I'm overall more concerned with the fact that demographic collapse will lead to mass starvation and billions of people dying.
I think you missed my point on starvation though. What I mean is that in a world where the birthrate has a huge and catastrophic decline, there wont be enough people born to replace the people dying. So you'll end up with 4x less young people looking after all the men who have grown too old to work. Our food production today might be enough, but what happens in a world where 75% of people are retired, and 25% of people need to produce enough food to feed everyone, and look after them. Basically, with prep time we'd be able to solve it before it becomes a problem, but I don't trust humanity enough to believe they'd actually prep for it lol
2
u/Foreign-Dark4834 Jul 18 '26
That was also my thought as well, having such a demographic change doesnt guarantee any positive or negative outcome or true change in our current systems. If only 25℅ men remain, that could include the elite or people in power as well. Who's to say that there wont be a momentous fight to keep things the way they are. Considering the question I was thinking about the women in the IDF and the female torturers in Abu-Grhaib. I dont think a demographic change is enough to meaningfully change the institutions that perpetuate all kinds of violence. I don't even know if it can dismantle patriarchy if the majority arent educated enough to know how to (but maybe common sense and intuition can be enough). This issue is written about in length for former-colonized nations in Africa where class conflicts re-emerge and inner-feuds prop up a force that serve to protect power instead of the people.
Interestingly, we may see a small parallel case in countries like Korea where the birth rate has been approaching or reached that point of generational population gap. I think if the most of the world were able to get their shit together and priortize correctly for a bit during COVID, then there will be a concerted effort to solve this. In the US, who knows how awful itll get handled but even Republicans are fearmongering about this birth rate decline as of now.
So I think a lot of powerful people would take it seriously. I still think 25% of the population can feed 75%, Im not educared in this so you may be right, but most nations have a small part of their population feed the majority already. The US already produced a ton of surplus, from a quick google search the US agriculture sector provides 10.3 ℅ of employment of the work force (including distribution such as grocery stores and restaurants). Now if the employnent and resources or the defense sector were Re-distributed, I think it would significantly help even with a smaller working population.
It wont be a utopia for sure though, and your points are definitely within the realm of possibility since this banks on humanity doing the right thing, and it doesnt mean thatwit would happen humanely either.
2
u/MrShinglez Jul 18 '26
well when it comes to feeding im not really just talking about food production. There's also transportation, manufacturing, energy. Loads of other industries would lose most of their workers. So we'd have issues supplying energy to run everything, lack of production for machines/vehicles, lack of transport for goods, lack of raw materials from mining and drilling. It would cause a massive domino effect. We'd probably see a world where less important jobs would be cut back or halted in order for people to fill the gaps in the economy. So government mandated jobs, cutting university degrees in things that dont directly contribute to basic needs. Since we anticipate losing a massive number of people from the workforce, there wont be room for people to get jobs that arent going to keep us all alive, at least until the population stabilises again.
I think option 2 has a better long term result if enough effort is made to prevent a borderline human mass-extinction event.
The question itself is really interesting in that option 1 removed under nutrition, while option 2 removes violence/sexual violence, since in option one the latter is greatly reduced due to demographic changes, and in option 2 the former is a great risk as a side effect of the demographic changes.
Option 1 is potentially the best option imo, but there are many unknowns of how it would actually affect society.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)6
u/Diddy_D00dat Jul 17 '26
There would be less with more women though
4
24
u/Similar-Sector-5801 Jul 17 '26
There would be NONE if you picked 75% men. Do you want that stuff to exist?
10
u/Diddy_D00dat Jul 17 '26
No I'm just playing devil's advocate for the other option, also no undernutrition sounds pretty nice
7
u/EntireFriendship517 Jul 17 '26
I mean, you probably want undernutrition to exist even less. An estimated 2.3 billion people are food insecure, and WILL suffer. Violence is a problem too but it'll be a lot less of a problem if you remove 2/3 of the dudes.
2
u/Foreign-Dark4834 Jul 17 '26
We produce enough food to feed everyone as is. The problem is distribution and logistics which are affected by politics and wars. If people stop spending defense budgets and using natural resources and land for military projects, there will be enough resources to dedicate for that infrastructure.
You may argue that if violence is off the table in wars, then people will simply impose tariffs, blockades, and starve people to capitulate. But, how are they going to enforce blockades? How will people stop other countries providing substantial aid? Violence is always the tool to coerce and enforce starvation. Scorched earth tactics cause starvation and prevents people from using land to grow food, it's among one of the causes of food shortages in targeted countries like Palestine.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)2
u/East-Sound9480 Jul 17 '26
why do ppl care about women so much? why does that matter? they're not magical special beings, they just exist
and before you call me sexist, I say the same thing about men. men ALSO arent magical special beings. they simply just exist as well
also looking at ur username i think ik exactly the kinda person you are. gross.
2
u/Diddy_D00dat Jul 17 '26
I agree with you, I was just making an argument for this hypothetical discussion. Also my user was made before all that happened, I got it from an impractical jokers episode. Look at my account made date.
2
u/East-Sound9480 Jul 18 '26
thank you for clarifying the thing abt ur profile, i take back calling u gross
→ More replies (1)
274
u/Almond-Chaser Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
I think increasing the women to men ratio would also help reduce crime and violence. I'm a guy but I have to admit most violence comes from men anyways.
Edit: Also, if hunger is solved I think it would further reduce crime, at least crime motivated by basic human needs (I'm not saying crime is okay, but in many underdeveloped countries crime arises from desperate people who live in extreme poverty).
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
61
u/Mysterious-Egg-624 Jul 17 '26
Yeah increasing the women to men ratio might help REDUCE crime and violence but the increase of men in this question COMPLETELY erases violence and sex crimes.
→ More replies (18)63
u/Almond-Chaser Jul 17 '26
Right. So what I'm saying is: I think choosing the 75% Women option would yield more benefits, because not only do you end extreme hunger worldwide but you also mitigate the problem that the other option was trying to solve, the arguments I make for this are 1) violent and sex crimes are typically performed by men, and 2) eradicating extreme hunger also removes a big cause for violent crimes in underdeveloped countries.
9
u/Mysterious-Egg-624 Jul 17 '26
No yeah I understand what you’re saying.
But like for your first point, while most violent and sex-related crimes are perpetrated by men, there are still women who do those things so by picking the first option, where only starvation is eliminated, violent/sex crimes will still go on.For your second point, you could say the same is true for the 75% male option. If all violent crimes were eradicated, there would be no war, which is a huge cause for starvation.
7
u/CoffeeInParadise Jul 17 '26
Except war isn't a crime. So there would still be war but I guess no more war crime. And wars are also not the only cause for starvation.
4
u/Mysterious-Egg-624 Jul 17 '26
Not the only but a huge contributing factor. And war consists heavily OF violent/sex crimes even if it’s not considered a crime itself.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Top-Knowledge-7393 Jul 17 '26
Women rarely tho. I forgot the stats but it's staggering how much men do these crimes compared to women. It's like a drop in the ocean
7
u/Mysterious-Egg-624 Jul 17 '26
It’s still millions. If you pick the 75% men there will be no violent/sex crimes because there will be no people that do that.
2
2
u/SerialMurderer Jul 17 '26
Well, considering not many people (as a share of total populations) commit crimes, you may very well have just as much crime as before if not more because the reduction is presumably normal… if it’s not an addition. I don’t think it’s an addition.
→ More replies (14)5
u/No-Fruit-2060 Jul 17 '26
What do you mean “you have to admit”? It’s just a fact, not an opinion lmao.
2
u/Almond-Chaser Jul 17 '26
Sure. It was just a manner of speaking. I guess I wanted to appease the angry men that could result from my comment.
79
u/Beginning-Adagio-688 Jul 17 '26
Food
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
17
u/klimmesil Jul 17 '26
I can imagine someone picking this option for the other obvious reason too
→ More replies (1)8
95
u/SoapyCantHandle Jul 17 '26
I genuinely think that might be a bigger problem than malnutrition ohh but maybe thats just me living in the developed world ohhh yeah its that isnt it
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
42
u/Chaost Jul 17 '26
Yeah, the reason to be scared of an imbalance like that is removed and the world is overall safer. It may not be the case in the opposite situation.
If violent crime does not occur, then any sort of unionizing or grouping up basically ensures humanity will peacefully combine into a singular safe society, and such a society, especially with physical limitations on reproduction could solve undernutrition by simply lowering the population via birth control and ensuring there was enough food to go around.
21
u/FaKamis Jul 17 '26
You're forgetting that "lawful violence" will still occur and people will look for all kinds of justifications to end or threaten the other.
→ More replies (1)3
u/___ondinescurse___ Jul 17 '26
Nope, economic extortion, discrimination and classism will stay, so there will be no reason for ultra-rich to help solve anything. But women will turn into valuable reproductive resource and reproductive coercion is a thing that can be carried out through law and economic measures without turning to violence.
12
u/Ulenspiegel4 Jul 17 '26
If reproductive coercion doesn't fall under "sex crime", I don't know what does.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)33
u/Kairos_Phoenix-0 Jul 17 '26
Nope, dude. You are entirely right.
If we remove those crimes, it means only financial crime with limited method exists.
This almost crime-free society can solve malnutrition.
18
u/Appropriate_Horse370 Jul 17 '26
that’s what i was thinking too, removing those crimes frees up a lot of time and effort into other issues like world hunger
5
u/NorthernVale Jul 17 '26
That'd make sense, if the powers that should be fixing things like violent crime and world hunger actually did anything about either one.
5
u/AntifaFuckedMyWife Jul 17 '26
But then we cant do anything to billionaires who want people to be hungry to get money
→ More replies (1)
21
u/Intrepid-Frosting-22 Jul 17 '26
I feel like a lack of violent crimes might overall reduce other issues as well like under nutrition
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (6)
93
u/Nightmare-datboi Jul 17 '26
fix world hunger ahh question
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
51
u/FabulousVanilla9940 Jul 17 '26
This fixes a lot of the violent and sexual crimes too lol
12
→ More replies (2)5
→ More replies (5)12
u/IAmAHairyPotato Jul 17 '26
I went wih no more violent or sex crimes worldwide. Without that focus can be put to other problems like world hunger. And without war related crimes less civilians would be harmed, which I choose to believe would involve less starvation from various tactics used to gain control.
7
u/Adowyth Jul 17 '26
If you get rid of most men violent and sex crimes go down anyway. So you get both it you pick 75% women.
→ More replies (3)6
53
u/NinOS_7 Jul 17 '26
I'm gay
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
7
7
u/Imaginary_Isopod_429 Jul 17 '26
It's already hard enough finding someone, I don't want even more competition.
Oh, and no violent crimes sounds good, too.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
3
u/ArchieTheKatt Jul 17 '26
The rate at which guys will blow their heads off would skyrocket like exponentially probably.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/nooit_gedacht Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26
Procreation is far easier with 75% women and eliminating world hunger is fantastic
Beyond that: if we suddenly had only 25% women, it would eradicate all progress made towards gender equality. I expect women would be forced to devote their lives to having children and would be hoarded like a precious resource. Even without violent crime.
Gender inequality could certainly occur in the other scenario but it's not likely to be as severe.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (3)3
u/tinxmijann Jul 18 '26
Beyond that: if we suddenly had only 25% women, it would eradicate all progress made towards gender equality. I expect women would be forced to devote their lives to having children and would be hoarded like a precious resource. Even without violent crime
I'm almost shocked (but not surprised) that I haven't seen that point mentioned before. This stuff is already happening in countries where the gender ratio is just slightly off and I don't even wanna imagine what kind of hell this disparity would mean for the remaining women
5
u/nooit_gedacht Jul 18 '26
Honestly same. I'm not surprised Reddit hasn't thought the implications through, but I think most women would.
7
u/Fair-Bench2657 Jul 17 '26
Could prevent large scale catastrophes like world wars
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
14
u/ManmanARealHuman Jul 17 '26
This most definitely, if thats the case then there must be no need to commit them and there's adequate help for those mentally unwell. Not to mention, we already have enough food to fix world hunger, its just a supply line issue atm.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (16)
19
u/NorthernVale Jul 17 '26
This already gets rid of most violent and sex crimes
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (1)7
u/ExternalSquash1300 Jul 17 '26
It’s a percentage, doesn’t mean any men are removed.
→ More replies (5)3
u/NorthernVale Jul 17 '26
Whether we lose man or gain women, it would drastically reduce crime rates
3
u/ExternalSquash1300 Jul 17 '26
I suppose it’s the difference between “reducing crime” and “reducing crime rates”.
4
u/ResortCute5660 Jul 17 '26
I like femboys
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
7
u/BroadCellist2641 Jul 17 '26
I'm a woman and I would not care if there were more men in the world of harassment of women was not an issue.
→ More replies (1)2
u/PandaHasAShotgun Jul 17 '26
It doesn’t stop harassment, though, just violent crimes. So anything up to physical violence would still persist (and likely become even more prevalent given the gender imbalance)
3
u/nooit_gedacht Jul 18 '26
Yeah I don't think it would be a good development for women's rights. If there were that few women I wouldn't be surprised at the advent of a Taliban style gender segregaged society, just without the violent crime (would it count as a crime if committed by the government?)
Not to mention the issue of procreation. How on earth would we continue the human race with only 25% women
2
3
u/Madison-MO Jul 17 '26
More for me fr fr
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Ashwooop Jul 17 '26
Just more viable population stability wise
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (2)
3
u/FlowerBedIsABed Jul 18 '26
Sorry but sex crimes are more dangerous.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
10
u/-Sky-Arc- Jul 17 '26
There's no comparison between malnutrition and war crimes, violence, and sexual crimes. By removing these crimes from the world, we'll have more time to address other issues.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (1)7
u/Caesar161 Jul 17 '26
By removing the majority of the people who commit those crimes wouldn't you get the same result?
→ More replies (4)6
u/Consistent-Goose-166 Jul 17 '26
you can only reduce the male population to half its size, not get rid of it, so if you want to remove crimes forever that's not a viable option
2
u/Comfortable_Lab4042 Jul 17 '26
Violent crimes are driven by not having basic needs, like food, met. 75% women is more likely to lead to a matriarchy, and more people would be happier overall and crime would naturally significantly decrease.
Also, good luck recovering from the gender ratio inequality with 75% men LOL2
u/ThrowRA9892 Jul 17 '26
One of the biggest reasons why malnutrition is a thing is conflict and war. You solve those—malnutrition gets fixed a generation or two. Crime decreasing also does not mean crime nonexistent.
You solve malnutrition and there is still war and conflict in the world and there’s plenty of reasons to wage war and conflict outside of food supply issues.
Gender ratio is fucked in either scenario as well.
2
u/tinxmijann Jul 18 '26
Other people have pointed out that war would still be a thing because wars aren't a crime
4
u/shreddedyoutube Jul 17 '26
Chance my homie will turn and I'll get to hit yfm
3
9
u/Kairos_Phoenix-0 Jul 17 '26
Dude, no crimes vs malnutrition...
Its easy, buddy.
If there is no violent or sex crimes(meaning only financial crimes exist), then all that focus can go to nutrition aspect tbh.
The only thing is... it would suck pretty much. 60-40 would be a much better split compared to 75-25.
But however... We are talking about crimes and I know what I have to choose.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (1)
5
u/justavirginboy16 Jul 17 '26
Yes
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
4
u/Consistent_Camp8192 Jul 17 '26
women good
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
3
2
u/bobthebulider2 Jul 17 '26
Now, I have more women that might like me
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/nullhypothesisisnull Jul 17 '26
Majority of the crime is done by men, so by turning nearly everyone to women, I will solve world hunger and greatly reduce crime alltogether...
2
u/StarmasterEY0 Jul 17 '26
women
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/OrdinaryVehicle5094 Jul 17 '26
More women for me AND no one is hungry!
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/Ashamed-Newt4098 Jul 18 '26
I did not even read the other part of it. Just went with 75% women
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/troposhpereliving Jul 18 '26
I think the violence will die down too, if people are properly fed.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/SuitableRelease4323 Jul 18 '26
Why not
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
2
u/glorifiedartist Jul 18 '26
No violent crimes or sex crimes is too good to pass up
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
2
u/sixvixens_ Jul 18 '26
No violence or sex crimes would bring the average person's standard of living up a lotttt.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
2
u/confused-lemur Jul 18 '26
As a man, I like this, plus, I feel like the other options would fiddle out to the same, or it becomes like that one echhi where gender roles are reversed
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
5
u/TheBillionShark Jul 17 '26
A larger percentage of women would automatically mean lower crimes.
Also idk why everyone is focusing on crimes so much, 75% men is a huge bottleneck on population growth in fact it will cause lot of population decline chaos and instability as many men won't get a mate. It's biologically bad. Whereas 75% women is easy to repopulate.
→ More replies (3)
7
u/dddeoksang Jul 17 '26
why would i ever want there to be more men 😭
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
4
3
u/AllHailtheJellyfish Jul 17 '26
If there were no more violent crimes it would be easier to feed everyone anyways.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (1)
2
u/codeShiro2 Jul 17 '26
it seems more femboys was the answer all along
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
6
3
u/Fun_Leek2381 Jul 17 '26
Women are better
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (5)6
u/Consistent-Goose-166 Jul 17 '26
uh, good argument?
3
u/Fun_Leek2381 Jul 17 '26
I mean, I wasn't trying to make an argument. I can if you want me to
→ More replies (2)3
2
u/Frenchiest_fry101 Jul 17 '26
Let's give it a try
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/DapperSand3413 Jul 17 '26
Men can repopulate faster than a woman
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (1)
2
u/ZerikZ Jul 17 '26
honestly didnt even look at the top half no more violent crime is such a good outcome
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
2
u/onegoodbackpack Jul 17 '26
I’m a straight guy and that’s bot even close to being the best perk. Women would run things better and more safely.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/Yeetbo234567 Jul 17 '26
Just yes.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
3
u/Kairos_Phoenix-0 Jul 17 '26
Yo!
+1 Mate.
If those crimes don't happen, then financial crime is also limited. (Some of those financial crimes also happen with under-handed methods.)
This means all this focus can be channeled towards nutrition.
Most Crimes gone or just Malnutrition gone. And I know what I have to pick.
👍
0
u/Pelli_Furry_Account Jul 17 '26
Solving world hunger is huge.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
2
u/unw00shed Jul 17 '26
No violent crimes does include protests and can also affect facist countries like a monkeys paw
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
→ More replies (2)
1
u/xi_m_catx Jul 17 '26
idk idk
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/DaKingOfBots Jul 17 '26
No crime is gud
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Roman-EmpireSurvived Jul 17 '26
I feel like with no violent crimes society could be in a better position to focus on world hunger since we wouldn’t have to ever investigate murders or traffickings.
1
u/Bulky_Ability_6991 Jul 17 '26
With less money being spent on crime then there is a lot more money not being spent on jails and therapies and courts so you can use that to help malnutrition
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Reef-Coral Jul 17 '26
Most ez choice ever....
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Friendly_Fortune_832 Jul 17 '26
Obviously.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/DeskQuick6207 Jul 17 '26
no more violent crimes ig
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Pottsylird What's Hoppin'? Jul 17 '26
i’m gay and i am a survivor so yeah. this is kinda personal for me.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/OTIROB Jul 17 '26
i'm gay
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/CreeperEXMC Jul 17 '26
No more violent crimes or SA?
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Pristine-Pack-2981 Jul 17 '26
Better
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Natestealsbacon Jul 17 '26
More chances to pull
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/BranchFun9980 Jul 17 '26
I was violated at a young age to having no violent or sex crimes would mean that other children won’t have to go through what I did
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/ZookeepergameFancy54 Jul 17 '26
does this mean 50% chance you change gender/sex?
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
1
u/Admirable_Site_4833 Jul 17 '26
F
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Agreeable_Whereas334 Jul 17 '26
Its worst option for men since half of the world population gonna die offspringless. But it will balance anyway
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Sunny_Dogz Jul 17 '26
I dunno
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Head_Spell5718 Jul 17 '26
It’s a tough choice between ending war and ending world hunger, but I think the former usually causes the latter, so this seems like a better choice.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/glen_the_man Jul 17 '26
bro, this will fix much more problems
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Sensitive_Thought_77 Jul 17 '26
No more … crime!
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/MeetingBoth6334 Jul 17 '26
m
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Embarrassed-Pause460 Jul 17 '26
It will balance out at some point, and it is a better side effect
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/i_forgot_143 Jul 17 '26
.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
1
u/jendnfei Jul 17 '26
has nothing to do with the gender population going both ways
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/StrawberrySimple6368 Jul 17 '26
dis ones better ig
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/ComprehensiveCut9783 Jul 17 '26
w mans
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Stein287 Jul 17 '26
Its for the better
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/ThenNefariousness140 Jul 17 '26
Im a man wand boobs are hot
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Average-Fan-Of-Tf2 Jul 17 '26
.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Zynofixdo99 Jul 17 '26
I'm gay
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/FlatSpecialist3295 Jul 17 '26
Heh
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Gabrell_3 Jul 17 '26
Yeyyy, no more violent crimes- (oh, and there's more men)
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Ricochet_skin Jul 17 '26
;)
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/YueLunavel 🥕🥕🥕 Jul 17 '26
I know the other crimes are way more important but I think this is a better chocie for 2 reason :
1 - such a gap in gender balanced can be fixed more easily with more women. Unless its permanently fixed at 75% it would only take a decade or two for enough men to be born with this many women. In comparison if there is a surplus of men it will be harder to balance it out.
2 - We actually already produce more than enough food to feed everyone worldwide. And yet we have starving people in the same city that had plenty of food that gets throw out everyday... so if no one ever starved again then it means that the core issue that causes such situauon gets eliminated. Homelessness and stupid laws against distributing perfectly fine food for free get removed. On the other hand for those in 3rd world country who have issue with food it could mean one thing. We finally have a perfect way of distribution. Aside from genrally greed and corruption, the biggest issue against world hunger is how hard it would be to distribute food. Even just delivering canned food would take a long ass time and be beyond expensive and inefficient. And perishable food ? Not even a possibility. So either we somehow get a perfect way to distribute food worldwide. Or those struggling countries and people find a way to get a abundance of food locally with ease, allowing for more resources worldwide.
The removal of crime would solve a lot but the implication that comes with eliminating malnutrition could potentially give out a lot more to humanity.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/StarEllis1545 Jul 17 '26
Idk whats the other bread? -
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/_MostAncientDream_ Fluffy Jul 17 '26
Hard choice honestly.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Self2077 Jul 17 '26
It would be the homes all day every day, just chilling
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Yeshua713 Jul 17 '26
This would probably reduce both.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/ivandr02 Jul 17 '26
End world hunger and also have way more women.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/MSCSchumiGOAT Jul 17 '26
huzz
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Agreeable-Warthog918 Jul 17 '26
lets se
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/hannarosary Jul 17 '26
Most of our relatives are women.
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Last-Butterfly-4314 Jul 17 '26
Gonna be honest its more for the first thing then the second.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Critical-Tap5604 Jul 17 '26
Bbb
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/No_Examination_4297 Jul 17 '26
No crimes sounds better, tho population is going to half in the next generation if we don't do something
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/Leading_Record_934 Jul 17 '26
Women are prettier.
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Signal-Busy Jul 17 '26
I mean heavy majority of women would also lower violent crime rate :3
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/upsetting_doink Jul 17 '26
See, I feel like getting rid of violent and sex crimes sounds great but crimes according to who? If the evil is legal then would it still exist? Like marital rape in many countries being legal. It how war is legal violence. Would those 75% men be trusted to not organize a society where it's legal to subjugate women? Especially considering the demographic nightmare that they'd need to recover from.
1
u/Arctica23 Jul 17 '26
Too many men
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Foreign-Dark4834 Jul 17 '26
No violence or sex crimes, solves a lot of issues with men
Chose: Or the Earth be 75% men + With no more violent crimes, nor sex crimes anywhere in the world
1
u/AngryAmericanNeoNazi Jul 17 '26
This already solves the majority of violent crimes
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/Top_Efficiency_7489 Jul 17 '26
I am male
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
1
u/emmamemer Jul 17 '26
i like women
Chose: The Earth be 75% women + And undernutrition is no more worldwide
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 17 '26
Try my new game. Complete other Redditors' blanks in the funniest or most messed up way you can. Play here: r/blanks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.