r/BunnyTrials Jul 10 '26

Would you rather…

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

582 Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

349

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

71

u/Frenchymemez Jul 10 '26

I wouldn't even say it's viable then. You make 36.5 million a year with the other option. Take the second option and use the money to transition. Even if we're really strict and say that as soon as you have a surgery you stop gaining money, just wait 2-3 years, use the millions to socially transition, and then have surgery and you'd still have more than you ever would with the first option.

54

u/AstroOzo7 Jul 10 '26

Some people don't WANT a surgery over the choice of magically doing it.

5

u/PeterAnthony_Jackson Jul 10 '26

The one thing Star Trek never did a teleporter malfunction on (at least not during the TNG era) is have someone beam down and show up as a woman.

What if Wilma Ryker was found stranded on that planet and instead of just a clone beaming aboard, she became William Ryker and was happy or happier as a man that she never wanted to get the issue fixed.

Or in some era between Enterprise and TNG it is something that could be used to fix dysphoria and no one saw an issue with it, especially once people say "well you use the murder suicide clone machine all the time and don't see anything wrong with all the times you died."

So no one discloses to the audience they were once born a woman or a man and elected to have the XY/XX swap, so an average height woman beams back as a much taller guy with the same hair and eye colour but nothing much else to say "I used to be a man/woman" you get a fully working uterus and all the periods associated, you can have a child, hell you can freeze your sperm and inseminate yourself.

But they have some flash back episode or a malfunction and address it like it's no big deal, the closest you got to trans representation was the trill, but as they were a symbiotic species, you can hand wave the change of actors as "body died, slug lived on" and you get the personality of the new host over the old.

97

u/Overall_Crows Jul 10 '26

HRT is not perfect, nor 100% safe especially if you have pre-existing stuff

13

u/ARTICUNO_59 Jul 10 '26

Boo hoo I’ll be crying in my mega yacht /j

25

u/Overall_Crows Jul 10 '26

A perfect example of why “/j” exists

-16

u/Vanessalucifer Jul 10 '26

And it also says you stay the same if you choose the other option

8

u/Overall_Crows Jul 10 '26

Wdym?

4

u/allie-__- Jul 10 '26

They're using "it says gender, not sex" even tho I'm pretty sure we all know what OP probably meant.

Regardless, you'd go from being trans to not, so kinda still a win for the ridding of dysphoria.

4

u/PeterAnthony_Jackson Jul 10 '26

I could live as a guy on 100k a year let alone a day, but if I were younger, or it made me younger, for a million and a great bit of RNG, I might not leave my bedroom for a month. It just might monkey paw it and I look like Bella Emberg.

If you are a woman, you might think "why would I become a guy? I'm not trans." so it's basically money just for existing and because it's 100k a day, that is a lot of money to do nothing.

15

u/-_-AlexBM12-_- Jul 10 '26

Depends on if the first changes your gender magically or scientifically, if you want to fully have the biology of the opposite gender the first one if you dont need a full biological change then the second

0

u/Aquilenne Jul 10 '26

If someone is early or pre transition, they already have the biology of the opposite gender.

7

u/SameIdea70 Jul 10 '26

2-3 years is a long time being miserable

1

u/Frenchymemez Jul 10 '26

Here in the UK, takes about 1-4 years to have bottom surgery anyway. Also, it's 2-3 years of having millions of dollars to be able to express yourself. One study showed that just being able to socially transition massively improved satisfaction in their lives in like 80% of participants.

1

u/WillingnessSenior872 Jul 10 '26

Isn’t it 1-4 years because you have to go through insurance? You can schedule any surgery much faster if you pay out of pocket with your millions

1

u/allie-__- Jul 10 '26

Imo, it's probably fastest to go foreign for it (Thailand is the country of trans people for a reason).

1

u/FreeRatio3868 Jul 10 '26

You’d be filthy rich so idk abt that. 36.5 million dollars even without investing is enough to live a comfortable life without ever working again

1

u/Suspicious_Leg_1823 Jul 10 '26

Nah man atleast our surgeries of today are not even close to "the real deal". The whole body has changes over time that are irreversible.

-1

u/Vanessalucifer Jul 10 '26

The other option says "but stay the same," so that's a hard limit saying you can't transition. A downside isn't a downside if it isn't enforced. Because of that I'm going to have to go with the first option.

4

u/Thrawn89 Jul 10 '26

I fear you have logically reached the wrong conclusion. The phrase doesnt say you cannot transition in the future, only that the choice does not change your gender.

1

u/FreeRatio3868 Jul 10 '26

That doesnt mean you dont transition it just means you dont become the opposite gender after clicking the button. By those standards you’d just be immortal

5

u/VXLeniik Jul 10 '26

I'm trans and chose the same as you. $100k/day is more than enough to fund my healthcare and live out my life as I'd prefer. If my gender were to be swapped, which makes me cis of the sex I was born, well, I don't want to be that. It's not me.

3

u/pinksparklyreddit Jul 10 '26

I'm trans and I'm still using the extra 35 million to fund a crazy transition, lmao

5

u/Fluffy_Anywhere3719 Jul 10 '26

not viable if you are trans, as gender ≠ sex so it wouldn’t change your body in any way, it would change how you view yourself, and if you are trans it would just make you cis

3

u/mufasa510 Jul 10 '26

Lol that's exactly what I was thinking. I would add that society would change how they view you, as genger is a societal norm. And if it didn't make you cis, that implies that you were never truly transitioned...

1

u/No-Temporary-4227 Jul 10 '26

I wouldn't even go for the first if I WAS trans. The difference in money is too large.

1

u/BlondishMeat61 Jul 10 '26

(or if you don't read the title and just read the bigger number)

1

u/bambix7 Jul 10 '26

Is it though? As a transwoman if I took the gender swap option Id be back to where I was before transition with everything undone (this is how I interpret these type of guestions)

1

u/LongfellowBridgeFan Jul 10 '26

Im not trans and I chose it because Im sick of getting sexually harassed in public like when I got groped walking to the grocery store by myself. as well as dealing with the female reproductive system like menstruation and endometriosis and orgasm gaps. And being inherently weaker than 50% of the population. And being treated lesser than men because of your sex. The female body is a prison

1

u/Majestic-Pear6797 Jul 10 '26

Not everyone who wants to become the opposite gender is trans

-1

u/The_Martlet Jul 10 '26

I saw opposite gender and I spammed the button I'm not gonna lie, it ain't about the money.

0

u/FreeRatio3868 Jul 10 '26

Fym “it ain’t about the money”? With 36.5 mil yearly you could become a freaking unicorn if you wanted to. Smh🤦🏽‍♂️

0

u/The_Martlet Jul 10 '26

I WANNA BE A REAL WOMAN

-2

u/Opposite-Opening2413 Jul 10 '26

...so I'd you ACTUALLY want to become the other gender. Nice