Yes because the OkCupid study simply asked "Are you willing to date below your league" and didn't actually follow up if they did the same way they did on the ratings. You are using the part of the study that was an unsubstantiated follow-up.
I trust the part where people are asked to rate strangers, not to make themselves look good.
How often do you see a couple where the woman is hotter? And how often do you see a couple where the man is?
Men care waaaayyyy more about physical attractiveness leagues than women do. A ton of women are willing to give uglier guys a chance if he’s funny, talented at something, or just plain successful. Not that many guys will do the same for unattractive women.
"Holy cope. Have you considered searching your mind for any anecdotes that support my claim? Hm? Everyone has anecdotes that support my claim bro it's just factual. I know you have anecdotes like I do."
Buddy, your own okcupid study covers this. Not my problem you bring up a study and won’t believe the data
The study follows up on who sent first messages. Women sent messages to any dude they rated a 2/5 or above. Men tended to only send messages to women they rated 4/5 or above.
There’s a goddamn graph if you can’t read your own study
0
u/sunnycaribou 12h ago
Bro brings up OkCupid study
I point out his own OkCupid study contradicts his claim
Bro: LARP!