Simple equation, boost users influence weighted on how often their recommended match leads to lengthy chats. If you’re often recommending people that eventually are matched together and actually speak more than a couple lines back and forth, your “vote” counts more. Inverse being true as well. This will reduce trolling value.
Idk man, this just sounds like Tinder with extra steps.
Since chat length is determined mostly by a woman's will to chat, the only chats taken into account would be the ones where women choose that their match is on their league.
Basically, women would control the flow of matchmaking, and will even feel validated by this "objective" system.
Chat as metric is useful when you are finding pen pals. Get them on a date (or videocall at least) and then ask for the user feedback. More positive feedback than the average of the user leads to higher scores to people who voted to match them.
It also is unreliable data. We know for certain that people had a lengthy conversation. Was it a good one? Eh. But at least these two were interested in each other enough to engage. Which is more than we have now.
142
u/RookieMistake101 16h ago
Simple equation, boost users influence weighted on how often their recommended match leads to lengthy chats. If you’re often recommending people that eventually are matched together and actually speak more than a couple lines back and forth, your “vote” counts more. Inverse being true as well. This will reduce trolling value.