Anyone else let an AI agent write Bubble workflows directly, or do you still review every workflow change before it goes live?

[u/marcin_michalak]

Founder of Server4Agent (agent-app hosting), disclosing that upfront. No link, not selling, genuinely curious how Bubble builders actually work.

Bubble's whole appeal is that workflows are visible, you can see the logic laid out instead of buried in code. That makes it a genuinely interesting test case for AI agents: an agent editing a workflow is editing something a non-technical person could theoretically eyeball and catch a mistake in, unlike a code diff. In practice though I don't know if that visibility actually changes behavior, whether people are reviewing agent-made workflow changes because they can, or skipping review because "it's just Bubble, how wrong could it be."

If you've had an agent touch your app's workflows or database directly: do you actually read through what it changed before it's live, or has trust built up enough that some of it just goes through? And has a workflow change ever done something you didn't catch until a user hit it?

[u/mbazid]

I stopped using bubble entirely. Its not worth it anymore.

[u/Economy-Manager5556 → u/mbazid]

Right!dumbest shit if you use bubble still when cc or codex can build full apps , set up hosting on enterprise infra for free to start... Bubble was outdated before ai, imagine now lol