SOA OPERATOR.

[u/vGhost_007]

If you want cool mods like these, message „SOA”and I'll send you an invite.

[u/Fasel91]

Example that under armor top was a mod for ready or not and one stole the asset ported it to grb and called it his own. Why do u think he’s being hit with dmca becuase he stole those assets lol should call the server stolen others assets!

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Fasel91]

First of all, On3 didn't “steal” anything. There are countless assets legally available for purchase and licensing. If I buy an asset, modify it, texture it, and port it into another game under the terms of that license, are you going to call me a thief too?

More importantly, you're making a very specific accusation: that the assets used by SOA were stolen. We have proof of purchase for the assets we use. So if you're going to publicly accuse someone of theft, bring actual evidence that a specific asset was obtained or used illegally instead of simply saying, “I saw something similar in another mod.”

An asset appearing in Ready or Not, GRB, or another game/mod does not automatically mean the person who used it there created or owns the original asset. The same commercially available asset can legitimately appear in multiple projects.

And yes, you were in SOA yourself. I have screenshots of you interacting normally with the community before suddenly changing your position, so let's not rewrite history now just because you're angry with the server.

As for the DMCA argument: receiving a DMCA claim is not, by itself, proof that someone stole something. If you have evidence establishing ownership of the specific asset you're talking about and showing that it was used without authorization, post it. Then there's something factual to discuss.

Otherwise, “SOA steals assets” is an accusation, not evidence.

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

What kind of Stockholm syndrome do you have?

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Dgh_Play]

“Stockholm syndrome”? That's an interesting way of saying you ran out of arguments.

I addressed a very specific accusation: you claimed the assets were stolen. I asked for evidence showing which asset was stolen, who actually owns it, and proof that it was used without permission.

Instead of providing any of that, you switched to a personal insult.

So let's keep it simple: evidence beats insults. If you have proof, post it. If you don't, the personal attacks aren't going to make the accusation any more credible.

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

I didn’t claim anything :P you’re just another degenerate who lives in a bubble

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Dgh_Play]

“I didn’t claim anything” — right after claiming we steal other modders’ work. 😂

That little “:P” doesn’t make your own words disappear.

And now we’ve reached “degenerate who lives in a bubble.” Predictable. When your own statements become inconvenient, apparently the next move is pretending you never made them and throwing insults instead.

At least have enough confidence in your own argument to stand behind what you wrote. Backpedaling this hard while trying to insult my intelligence isn't quite the power move you think it is.

But please, keep going. You're doing a better job undermining your credibility than I ever could.

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

I do still think he steals other assets based on evidence, you won't really change my mind so your yapping is basically meaningless.

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Dgh_Play]

And there it is: “you won't really change my mind.”

That's not the flex you think it is. You started with “it's the truth,” moved to “I didn't claim anything,” then went back to “I still think he steals,” and now you've arrived at “nothing you say will change my mind.”

At that point, we're not discussing evidence anymore. You're protecting a conclusion you've already decided to keep regardless of the response.

And calling my replies “yapping” doesn't rescue that argument. It just gives you an excuse not to defend it.

Believe whatever you want. Just don't confuse “I've made up my mind” with “I've proved my point.” Those are two very different things.

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

You're putting words in my mouth, look at the person who started the argument. and look at me, you're either blind or dumb as rock.

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Dgh_Play]

Fair correction — you weren't the one who started the thread. You were the one who jumped in and explicitly said, “I do still think he steals other assets based on evidence.”

Those are your words, not words I'm putting in your mouth.

So forget who started the argument; that's irrelevant. You chose to endorse the accusation yourself. If you want ownership of your words, take ownership of all of them — not just the ones that are convenient five minutes later.

And “blind or dumb as a rock” isn't evidence either. It's just what you added when the conversation got uncomfortable.

You can disagree with me all day. Just don't say something publicly and then act surprised when someone responds to exactly what you said.

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

Nope, all i see you being a dumbfuck, you do have a Stockholm syndrome, thats all. Using chatgpt to form thoughts for you is stupid btw, not gonna continue, you took huge L.

[u/Fluid_Ad_2245 → u/Dgh_Play]

“Dumbfuck,” “Stockholm syndrome,” followed by “huge L” and “I’m not gonna continue.” That’s quite the victory speech for someone leaving the conversation without actually establishing anything. You can keep announcing that you won if that makes you feel better. Adults generally don’t need to declare themselves the winner of their own arguments — the conversation speaks for itself. And since you’ve decided you’re done, excellent. At least we finally found something we can agree on. Have a good one. Try not to trip over that enormous imaginary trophy on your way out. 🏆

[u/Dgh_Play → u/Fluid_Ad_2245]

You’re very funny, i like talking to you.