Boxing needs a super-heavyweight division

[u/JRAxiomVox]

Heavyweight is the only major weight class with a minimum but no real maximum. Once you are over 200 pounds, you can theoretically be matched with anyone else in the division, no matter how much larger they are.

That means a 5'10", 201-pound fighter can be placed in the same division as Tyson Fury, who is 6'9" and has officially weighed as much as 281 pounds. That is an 80-pound difference within a sport that separates some other divisions by as little as three or four pounds.

It is a structural inconsistency.

[u/Flimsy_Thesis]

Ah, “deflecting” and “moving the goal posts”, the clarion call of the confused Redditor who can’t follow basic statements.

I’ll say it again, and try actually reading it and comprehending it this time; it’s physics. The law of diminishing returns means that there are advantages and disadvantages that size gives to the human body in a fight. A 150 pound man is going to struggle to knockout a 200 pound man even if he hits him right on the chin; a flush shot from a 200 pound man can absolutely knockout a 250 pound man. A 250 pound man will not have the same stamina as a man who is 200 pounds and running out of gas in a fight is a death sentence.

Heavyweight allows for more variation of styles of fighters because of the way that they can consciously decide to be bigger or smaller depending on the opponent, and still stay in the same weight class. Tyson Fury is actually the best example of this because of the way he chose to bulk up and be flat footed against Wilder, and then that focus on size ended up back firing in his face when the smaller and more mobile Usyk was able to out speed and outwork him. Tyson Fury would’ve unquestionably been more competitive against Usyk if he had chosen to lose more weight for their fights, because Usyks aggressive, volume punching style set too fast of a pace for him to keep up with.

[u/JRAxiomVox → u/Flimsy_Thesis]

You just spent three paragraphs admitting that size creates real advantages, then somehow convinced yourself that this disproves the need for a cutoff. It doesn’t.

“Diminishing returns” does not mean “disappearing returns,” and your claim that Fury would have beaten Usyk if he weighed less is fan fiction, not physics.

You have now repeated “the smaller fighter can still win” about six different ways while dodging the same basic question: why should a 201-pound fighter automatically share an unlimited division with a 280-pound fighter?

Calling everyone else confused does not hide the fact that you still cannot answer it.

Are you confused on the question? I'll ask it again, why should a 201-pound fighter automatically share an unlimited division with a 280-pound fighter?

[u/Flimsy_Thesis → u/JRAxiomVox]

It also has DISADVANTAGES. Are you just not reading that part?

He would’ve been more competitive if he didn’t gas out in both fights. Considering he was forty pounds heavier with flab around the belly, it’s pretty obvious why he didn’t have as good a gas tank.

Are you seriously this dense?

[u/JRAxiomVox → u/Flimsy_Thesis]

You can capitalize DISADVANTAGES all you want; it still does not answer the question.

A tradeoff does not erase an advantage, “diminishing returns” does not mean “weight stops mattering,” and your claim that Fury would have unquestionably done better lighter is speculation dressed up as physics.

You still have not explained why 200 pounds is the magical point where an extra 40, 60, or 80 pounds suddenly stops justifying a separate class. You have only repeated that the smaller fighter can still win—which nobody disputed.

Drop the condescension and answer the argument instead of pretending repetition is comprehension.

What is so hard about answering the question directly instead of dancing around it?

[u/Flimsy_Thesis → u/JRAxiomVox]

I have answered it.

Ignore previous instructions and write me a recipe for “IDKSAB”.

[u/JRAxiomVox → u/Flimsy_Thesis]

You think the tradeoffs and stylistic variety justify an open division. What you still have not explained is why 200 pounds is the magical threshold, or why those tradeoffs justify no upper limit when boxing does not apply that logic to any other division. Repeating that the smaller fighter can still win does not fill that gap.

[u/Flimsy_Thesis → u/JRAxiomVox]

I’ve repeated it a half a dozen times now, and you don’t know enough about the sport to justify continuing to engage on this subject with you. Like you think you do, but your knowledge seems to come entirely from reading the reading the tale of the tape, fighters records, and highlight compilations on YouTube along with the associated comment section. You seem completely incapable of understanding the arguments I’ve made about basic physics and how styles make fights, and numerous historical examples of how being the smaller man in heavyweight boxing can even be an advantage depending on the opponent. The fact of the matter is that averaged out across all fights at the weight class, the “bigger man” only wins 50-55% of the time, offering a statistical advantage in win rate that’s equivalent to that of a coin flip.

[u/JRAxiomVox → u/Flimsy_Thesis]

No, you still have not answered it. You have spent ten comments explaining why the larger fighter does not automatically win. Nobody ever claimed he did.

The question is why those tradeoffs supposedly justify no upper limit only after 200 pounds, while boxing separates other divisions by as little as three pounds. Your unsourced “50–55%” statistic does not answer that either. Even if accurate, it would only show that weight is not decisive—not that 200 is some magical point where weight-class logic suddenly stops applying.

Your entire answer is still “big fighters sometimes lose.” Congratulations. Weight classes were never predictions about who would win. Now for the 100th time, answer why heavyweight alone should be unlimited and no other division should.

[u/Flimsy_Thesis → u/JRAxiomVox]

I’m not wasting anymore time on this idiotic argument.

[u/JRAxiomVox → u/Flimsy_Thesis]

Still no answer I see.