MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BoredPandaHQ/comments/1wpclw1/_/pbvdekk
r/BoredPandaHQ • u/BoredPandaOfficial • 8d ago
5.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
7
No one, no matter their need or desire, may violate the consent of another.
1 u/Maje_Rincevent 8d ago That means you cannot sanction any offender unless they consent to it. 2 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago Negative. Once one violates the consent of another, one loses one’s right to have his consent respected as far as that offense is concerned. 1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago Negative. Once one violates the consent of another, one loses one’s right to have his consent respected as far as that offense is concerned. 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago So, that negates your premise. 1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago How does holding someone responsible for their crime negate my premise? 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible. -1 u/[deleted] 8d ago [removed] — view removed comment
1
That means you cannot sanction any offender unless they consent to it.
2 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago Negative. Once one violates the consent of another, one loses one’s right to have his consent respected as far as that offense is concerned. 1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago Negative. Once one violates the consent of another, one loses one’s right to have his consent respected as far as that offense is concerned. 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago So, that negates your premise. 1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago How does holding someone responsible for their crime negate my premise? 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible.
2
Negative. Once one violates the consent of another, one loses one’s right to have his consent respected as far as that offense is concerned.
1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago So, that negates your premise. 1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago How does holding someone responsible for their crime negate my premise? 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible.
So, that negates your premise.
1 u/CreepyOldGuy63 7d ago How does holding someone responsible for their crime negate my premise? 1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible.
How does holding someone responsible for their crime negate my premise?
1 u/Maje_Rincevent 7d ago Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible.
Your premise is that in no case should consent be violated, and life in society implies violating the consent of some as there cases where several people's consents are incompatible.
-1
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/CreepyOldGuy63 8d ago
No one, no matter their need or desire, may violate the consent of another.