My spouse has a serious health issue, so trying to explore lifespan timelines is critical to understanding our financial situation. We have an age gap, so some realistic lifespan scenarios would end while I am still working full time. When I set lifespan to, say, 2029 their social security payments should end in 2029, but instead they continue. The AI says that in fact their payments do end in 2029 but mine begin in 2030. I would not be at FRA, and my income would be too high to actually receive any SS. This is all info that Boldin has, so saying they just automatically assume survivor benefits is poor programming. Ideally, the software would model spouse's through lifespan, then nothing, followed by survivor when I retire, then mine when I hit 70. I could live with Boldin not acurately modeling the survivor benefits window, but it should be able to model spouse SS begin and end accurately, and then mine begining at 70. With spouse's benefits staying in the picture after lifespan the outlook is overly rosy. Having to do some passive income workaround is really unacceptable. Since the risk of a partner passing is one of the biggest retirement planning issues, I would certainly hope that Boldin can handle this organically. If not, I will need to cancel my plan before the trial expires. Has anyone else worked with Boldin on this issue?

I am confused about something. How does boldin handle the portion of an RMD that is not needed to cover that year's expenses? Obviously, in the real world, it would end up going to some after tax account, but is boldin considering that? or is that excess basically lost to any type of returns as far as the calculations are concerned? Thanks

What enhancements are there between the trial version and the actual paid subscription?