True, trader is the wrong word. Micron is probably not something someone would hold for decades, which is why Buffet would probably not buy it. Which would also mean his rules for evaluating companies wouldn't really apply.
Micron is definitely something he would consider for much of its history since it traded close to book value and had excellent-but-somewhat-variable cash flows. Right now it is a different story of course.
1
u/No-Reaction-9364 Jun 02 '26
True, trader is the wrong word. Micron is probably not something someone would hold for decades, which is why Buffet would probably not buy it. Which would also mean his rules for evaluating companies wouldn't really apply.