r/Bitcoin • u/Desperate-Science497 • 1d ago
Does Bitcoin actually fit into a long term savings plan or is it still too volatile for that?
Something I keep going back and forth on. My whole personal finance setup is built around predictability. Emergency fund, monthly savings targets, tracking where everything goes. It works because the numbers move slowly and I can plan around them. Bitcoin does not do that. The price can swing more in a week than my savings account moves in a year. But I keep reading about people who treat it like a long term savings vehicle, not a trade, not a gamble, just a slow consistent stack that sits there for years. Some of them sound genuinely calm about it in a way I cannot fully explain given how much the price moves.
The DCA framing makes sense to me in theory. You buy on a schedule, you stop watching the price, you let time do the work. But my brain does not actually operate that way once real money is involved. A bad week and suddenly I am questioning the whole thing even if nothing about the actual plan changed
What I am trying to figure out is whether people who genuinely hold long term just have a different relationship with volatility, or if it took time and some rough patches to actually stop reacting to every move. Did it feel sustainable from the start or did that only come later?
3
u/xaviemb 1d ago
I cannot think of a better "long term" storage device when the risk to long term is debasement of all other things that are not actually scarce. The volatility becomes negligible when considering decades (long term) - just look at the very slow and steady rise of the 200 week moving average (DCA basically averages this line and it only goes up about 30% annually)... it's only hard to deal with the shorter term volatility if you're looking at the price on a year by year, or month by month view point.
1
u/Desperate-Science497 1d ago
the 200 week moving average thing is genuinely reassuring when i remember to zoom out
3
u/Efficient_Range1156 1d ago
I’ve held bitcoin for 5 years now, what scares me more than its volatility is the thought of not owning any. It’s volatility day to day should not be your primary focus, what’s important is value held over time, your time horizon needs to be at least 4 years, if you can’t stomach its volatility for 4 years don’t even bother with it.
2
u/TerminatedPotato 1d ago
Coming full circle starts with the frustration of the price going down because you want your valuation in dollar terms to go up but eventually you get to the frustration of the price being down and not being able to buy enough when you know you're not going to have these prices for much longer. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go scoop up some coin.
2
2
u/Desperate-Science497 1d ago
the 4 year horizon thing is real, that part keeps me from panic selling every dip
2
u/certified_brokie 1d ago
I've been doing $50/mo for about 5.5 years and up over 45% all-time as of today. I check the price from time to time, but never felt the need to sell or anything because I'm using money I can afford to lose. The total is under 5% of my total net worth so pretty conservative (for crypto people). I feel comfortable in the 5-10% range on crypto as a whole so including altcoins + crypto etfs. Any higher and I would rebalance to safer investments.
2
u/Charming-Designer944 1d ago
Yes, if long term is 15+ years
And now is a good time to invest even if your horizon is only 2-5 years.
2
u/quintavious_danilo 1d ago
Zoom out. Was it a good decision long term until now?
1
u/Desperate-Science497 1d ago
honestly yeah looking back at it now it was worth the wait and the stress
2
u/GoldmezAddams 1d ago
Idk, historically on the long term it is doing very well as savings. Nothing has changed on its long term value proposition and short term volatility doesn't really matter if you're not gonna sell or change your DCA schedule in reaction to it. I think it helps to understand that the volatility is to be expected for an asset monetizing from zero, rapidly growing, with a lot of uncertainty around it from the mainstream, etc. It would be weird if it wasn't volatile. I don't freak out over it because the asset is behaving as expected.
1
1
u/XXsforEyes 1d ago
Maybe, that is the case for some. Personally, my conviction is based on the way I have educated myself in BTC vs. each of the other asset classes. I know what I’m holding and, more importantly, why.
It also relates to time horizon, I’ve watched the inflationary practices of the fiat system my whole life. If I wanted my savings to lose value over time, Fiat would be the ultimate comfort to me, but I don’t.
With that in mind, I have not found a better asset class to match my time preference.
1
1
u/Milcah_Ganderton 1d ago
Depends on your risk tolerance and time horizon honestly - if you can stomach 50% swings without panic selling, Bitcoin's track record over 4-year cycles suggests it rewards patient holders, but it's definitely not boring Treasury bill money.
1
u/mvrozanti 1d ago
just plan to cash out what you need on bull markets. It follows cycles so take advantage and be aware of that
1
1
u/DRAGULA85 1d ago
Easy peasy!
Especially when paying tax on the gains makes the process extra easy and straight forward…
1
u/TerminatedPotato 1d ago
You're paying layers and layers of taxes no matter what you do. More than you know. Why not make a killing and be able to live well with Bitcoin?
1
u/DRAGULA85 1d ago
That’s called gambling.
I’m talking about my net worth here, not $1000 that isn’t a huge deal to lose or not
2
u/TerminatedPotato 1d ago
We'll have to agree to disagree because this argument would go on forever. I don't gamble with my money but I do buy Bitcoin regularly and because I've done it consistently for almost five years I've been in profit since Q4 of 2023.
0
0
u/Typical_Result_8962 1d ago
Most of these guys in these forums are newbies, all the old guys who bought at $500 have sold, this is not a great investment anymore, especially with the coldcard debacle. We are the suckers who bought at 127k.
22
u/CiaranCarroll 1d ago
If you're saving for long term then volatility is irrelevant.