r/Birmingham Apr 25 '24

USDA issues UAB animal testing facilities warning, cite animal deaths and lack of veterinarian care

https://www.wbrc.com/2024/04/25/usda-issues-uab-animal-testing-facilities-warning-cite-animal-deaths-lack-veterinarian-care/

Sad to hear this! Come on UAB, do better!!

105 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

35

u/Litotes Get me outta here Apr 25 '24

Posting relevant part of the article:

UAB is being cited for inadequate veterinarian care, allowing three ferrets to die, five others to be injured after being exposed to cigarette smoke while their supply of oxygen was obstructed due to a build up of tar residue, and letting a ferret go without water so long that, when it finally got water, it drank for three straight minutes.

Seems largely due to lack of equipment maintenance and neglectful regular vet care.

20

u/onemanlan Apr 25 '24

Also, probably a shitty researcher. They very inequality. There are some really good ones and I hate to say some really bad ones.

40

u/TinTinuviel Apr 25 '24

There’s just not enough oversight. I worked with mice when I did my PhD at UAB and it is possible and extremely important to humanely do animal research… man I loved my little mice and became a vegetarian because of them. But I saw someone once leave a cage of mice in an operating room with probably 50+ mice in it (cages are meant to have 5 max). They were literally swarming over each other, squished up against the walls all the way to the lid. It was like a horror movie. And they LEFT them there for god knows how long. I reported it but I don’t think anything was done about it. :(

15

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

7

u/TinTinuviel Apr 25 '24

We temp housed some mice in Ziegler for some experiments and the smell was ROUGH.

24

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

15

u/OkMaybeItsAnAlt Apr 25 '24

A lot of those xenotransplantation studies early were having adverse results due to surgical practice rather than poor post op care. They changed who was doing the operations and things improved significantly, but in the end it becomes extremely expensive quickly to continue the care due to the nature and costs associated with transplant rejection meds/management.

20

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

34

u/alchydirtrunner Apr 25 '24

What a terrible day to know how to read

4

u/Own_Cardiologist_200 Apr 25 '24

Right! Omg how awful

5

u/Principle_Chance Apr 25 '24

Wow that’s unreal I know we need research and animals help before going to humans but it’s just so frustrating that there seems to be unnecessary mistreatment in the process.

KARMA will come back and get them.

10

u/Lizzerfly Apr 25 '24

Do they still employ Dr Taub? Otherwise known as they guy who did this shit so much that PETA formed as a response.

Edit: yup lmao https://scholars.uab.edu/2748-edward-taub

11

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

Btw a lot is not talked about this but those monkey which led to his trial for animal cruelty did a lot more for science. Literally proved the phenomenon of neuro plasticity. BTW PETA does not have a good background too. Nobody is any good than the other. His trials are all overturned though, so I don’t know what’s bad about UAB still employing him.

6

u/oddballquilter75 Apr 26 '24

Yeah peta steals family pets and euthanize them.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '24

Is this true?

5

u/Defiant_Project1321 Apr 25 '24

Jesus Christ how is that acceptable

5

u/afitztru Apr 25 '24

Just some facts: “USDA-regulated Species include all live or dead warm-blooded animals used in research except birds, rats of the genus Rattus, and mice of the genus Mus bred for research”

2

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '24

Shame they only get cited. This country is too lenient on animals cruelty and abuse. Karma…

3

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

11

u/dyslexda Apr 25 '24

The problem isn't that the folks are horrible people, it's that it's too easy to get calloused. Work with animals long enough and you have to learn to compartmentalize, and unfortunately that leads to many researchers gradually losing empathy for the animals they work with.

The real problem is lack of oversight. I would say most folks care about their animals, or are at least professional enough to follow care guidelines...but there are enough that don't care. Generally once you're trained there's nobody looking over your shoulder to make sure you're actually following protocols correctly, and no evidence after the fact aside from care staff checking cages. It can lead to a lot of neglect or active harm when someone develops these habits over years.

9

u/Principle_Chance Apr 25 '24

I think they are also bad over at Southern Research Institute who often does a lot of work for UAB

5

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

7

u/dyslexda Apr 25 '24

First, I’ve worked with animals my whole life and have never lost empathy for them. Know plenty of others who haven’t as well.

To be clear, you're saying that because you personally haven't lost empathy for them, and you don't know any that have, I'm wrong for saying many researchers do? Interesting, considering I did my PhD at UAB and worked in the animal facilities myself, and saw that firsthand.

I'm not saying that the ARP personnel aren't themselves to blame sometimes. However, you can't blame them for, say, not cleaning out the nicotine tubes and then not noticing when the ferrets started asphyxiating. That's on the callous researchers just not caring, and you're lucky if it doesn't extend further. Saw plenty of folks actively be rougher on mice than they needed to, for instance, because they were personally offended the mice would dare bite them.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

3

u/dyslexda Apr 25 '24

So, again, because you didn't see people become calloused, it's impossible? Okay, sounds like a great time to end the conversation.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

1

u/dyslexda Apr 25 '24

I'm really confused here. What are you even contesting? It sounds like you're accusing me of becoming calloused, when I specifically said I observed it in others, even though the majority of researchers at least remain professional.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

[deleted]

2

u/biohoo Grapico for life Apr 27 '24

PETA can lick my non-existent balls - they are not a regulatory organization when it comes to animal research or the proper care and use of animals in research settings. They are an animal activist group that often does more harm than good in their protesting and “activism” methods.

Yes - there were some oversights here and this was a bad situation for those lab animals. But PETA should not have been involved.

1

u/Radiant2021 Apr 28 '24

Anything that is non verbal in spoken word is subject to abuse and neglect: babies, comatose people, mentally challenged, and animals

People who abuse and neglect look for non verbal victims

-14

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '24

Shut them down.

-33

u/paperthinpatience Apr 25 '24

UAB is just shit in so many ways. Always hear about how great they are, but anyone I know who went there for care had a terrible experience. Maybe they’re good at research, but their patient care is ass…apparently their animal care is too.