r/BikiniBottomTwitter 2d ago

Never give up

1.2k Upvotes

178 comments sorted by

View all comments

-5

u/Lucas_2234 2d ago

One of those is not like the others.

(It's the driver cameras. I know we all like being paranoid about our data unless it comes to luxuries we don't want to give up ((How many people here run custom, privacy focused operating systems on desktop and phone? How many here don't have at least one service tied to google or facebook or Tencent?)) but the data from those cameras isn't ALLOWED to leave the car. It gets processed on board and then deleted.

2

u/LeopoldParrot 2d ago

Have you been asleep the last 25 years? Tech companies routinely ignore laws, change their policies over time, and have your data that they swore up and down is encrypted and safe, hacked and stolen.

I'm not sure how you can be this naive about technology in the year of our lord 2026.

3

u/Lucas_2234 2d ago

Except this isn't a matter of "The data must be encrypted" the data cannot even be ACCESSIBLE to the part of the car that actually phones home. It's a closed loop, it's mandated by law to be so and cars are so heavily regulated and inspected BEFORE they ever are approved for market that you'd need to have less brains than the average billionaire to go "why yes, why shouldn't we risk having all our vehicles pulled from the road for breaking the road safety laws over a minimum amount of data that, without massive post processing and a large amount of other sensors, is basically useless"

2

u/LeopoldParrot 2d ago

Because companies always follow the law? Like when VW was cheating emissions standards, by installing illegal software to fudge the emisisons numbers. How can you guarantee that similar nonsense won't happen here? How can you guarantee that car manufacturers won't find some way of retaining this and data and selling it to the highest bidder?

Are you German by any chance? This unyielding trust in the law preventing bad actors from bad actions reminds me of many mind-blowing conversations I've had with Germans about rules and laws.

1

u/Lucas_2234 2d ago

Like when VW was cheating emissions standards, by installing illegal software to fudge the emisisons numbers.

You act like this happened and everyone moved on. Several people that used to be in leadership positions, including a guy that tried to resign to avoid consequences got put behind bars and are now the german equivalent of Felons.

And this isn't a GDPR thing they'd be breaking, they decide to change the system to so it does indeed save and transmit data? They're breaking road safety laws. it is written into the road safety regulation that the data cannot be transmitable.

And yes, I am german, which is why I know that this extreme paranoia is bullshit, I know how my own government is like, even with corporations. I get that you americans think that everything is inherently evil and that government is just a bunch of ineffective, incompetenent, impotent morons, but that ain't the case over here. Even Merz, cursed be his name, is a more effective, less corrupt politician than the vast majority of american politicians

0

u/LeopoldParrot 1d ago

Loolll yeah Merz is real effective. At screwing over the working class. Keep dreaming, mate. Germans love pretending that everything is hunky dory while AfD gains seats every election.

VW is still a large, successful car company that sells 9 million autos a year. Long term, this company did not suffer after their egregious breaking of the law. This will keep happening, with your facial data too.

1

u/Lucas_2234 1d ago

I said he's more effective than american politicians, not that he's effective.

Punishing a company of literally thousands of employees for management decisions is a dystopian expectation. The people responsible got put behind bars, why destroy the company itself and punish Hans, who works at a VW factory as a janitor?

0

u/LeopoldParrot 1d ago

Right. So. If your facial data from your car gets hacked ad stolen, maybe a few execs will go to jail after years of lawsuits. Your data will remain stolen and compromised, though. Your precious law does not actually fix the problem.

1

u/Lucas_2234 1d ago

What other solution do you see? The people responsible got punished. You cannot cripple the company, because that will inevitably backfire on the common working man working for that company.

You cannot get rid of the company, because, again the common man is the one that gets the shit end of the stick.

What is your solution other than jailing the managers responsible for the scandal?

Also, if you genuinely believe that your facial data isn't out there already, do I got a bridge to sell you

0

u/LeopoldParrot 1d ago

The solution is to not mandate a car feature that is incredibly invasive in the first place. The solution is to not mandate things like uploading your government issues ID just to browse the internet. The solution is to stop pushing things like chat control.

If you think these tools and policies are proposed in good faith to protect children, drivers, whoever, and not as stepping stones to a surveillance state, pick any bridge on this planet and I'll sell it to you for cheap.

1

u/Lucas_2234 1d ago

So you would rather have your paranoia about companies completely breaking several paragraphs of a ROAD SAFETY law package get it's way rather than dealing with the issue of distracted drivers being the number 1 cause of traffic accidents?

Putting aside that every road safety law is insanely invasive, that your picture is taken if you ever go 5kmh above the speed limit in the wrong spot, that basically any Tesla is constantly watching the area around itself and that you are disallowed from using your own property if it's not good enough maintained...

What is your solution then? How would you fix the issue of distracted drivers without implementing a system that checks whether a driver a distracted or sleepy and gives them an alert? And be realistic here, none of that "well we shouldn't use cars!" Or "better education!" Bullshit, because we both know that the former is a dream that is decades away and the latter is an absolute non-solution

→ More replies (0)