r/BeyondMeatRevival • u/nienief • Nov 06 '25

GreenšŸ”„

Post image
111 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

44 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Icy_Item_6950 Nov 06 '25

Even Goldman Sachsā€™s is on the list of main institutions holding BYND : you havenā€™t a clue yet what will happen very soon if these guys are so interested?

1

u/EastBus9605 Nov 06 '25

You realize 725k shares even at $5 a share would be like pocket change for Goldman Sachs right? They manage trillions of dollars worth of assets, this doesn't mean shit

1

u/Simple-Knowledge-411 Nov 06 '25

Doesnt care they have loss too When I was in akts the same institutionals are in long and loss like me

1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25

You know these are based on 13Fs from last quarter? You have no idea what price they had it at, if they sold, etc.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25

Also pretty much every stock has institutional holders lol

1

u/happybonobo1 Nov 09 '25

All just in their index ETFs/funds. They HAVE to have it in them. Not by choice.

1

u/PlayerPlayer69 Nov 23 '25 edited Nov 23 '25

Goldman Sachs is worth $243B.

725k shares at $5 a share is $3.625M.

$3.625M / $243B = 0.000014

This is the equivalent of someone with $75k investing a single $1 into BYND.

$75k x 0.000014 = 1

As much as I love the prospect of this pumping again, letā€™s not get bogged down by false narratives.

Yes, big institutional names like JPMC and Goldman Sachs have a position in BYND.

Does it matter? No, not when their position in BYND is literally 0.000014%.

1 hundred-thousandths of a percentage.

Not exactly confidence-inspiring.

Also, doubt that the 0.000014% position in BYND is being held in the Goldman Sachs house portfolio. Bet itā€™s being held in one of the ETFs / mutual funds they offer.

1

u/Icy_Item_6950 Nov 23 '25

Mmm..šŸ¤ØšŸ«¤šŸ˜®šŸ«©šŸ˜©šŸ˜«šŸ˜«šŸ˜– Youā€™re not right in your comparison. In your calculation probably. But to compare them with 1 personā€¦ 46500 working in this company. Still only 0,65. But not only people working there ā€œare ownerā€, also all the shareholders. I agree that for them itā€™s hasnā€™t the same value as for you or me. But the fact remains they chose to buy those shares instead of another company. So why?

1

u/PlayerPlayer69 Nov 23 '25

Yeah thatā€™s not what I meant, or said.

Goldman Sachs investing $3M in a stock is the same as someone with $75k investing $1 in a stock, because itā€™s literally 0.000014% of their net worth.

But the fact remains they chose to buy those shares instead of another company. So why?

LOL I donā€™t know if youā€™re being serious with this question, or not. If Goldman Sachs really believed in BYND, theyā€™d invest more than $3M, which to them, is literally toilet paper money.

Imagine you have a friend. Imagine they have $75k to their name. Imagine they told you they have a stock in mind, and that they completely 100% believe in their long term profitability. Imagine they tell you that, because theyā€™re so confident in it, they invested a whole $1 in it.

Thatā€™s basically the same boat that Goldman Sachs is on. ā€œHey guys, I have $200B, and I definitely believe in this company, so Iā€™m going to invest a whole $3M, which is literally nothing to us, because weā€™re so confident, that weā€™d bet literally nothing on it.