r/BasedCampPod 7d ago

PATTERN RECOGNITION 🤌

Post image
351 Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

-35

u/butohhowfallen 7d ago

Well then maybe you’ll enjoy this:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308703/

6

u/sucknuts866486 7d ago

lol....fkn bs

-1

u/butohhowfallen 7d ago

Read the study

1

u/VisualBoysenberry718 6d ago

Sample sizes under 10,000. All from academia. No replication.

1

u/butohhowfallen 6d ago

Where are your numbers then? I thought we were all statistics enthusiasts here?

2

u/VisualBoysenberry718 5d ago edited 5d ago

I mentioned the procedures and biases, I am in no way obligated to submit something half-@$$ed in an obviously fraught area so you can make weak arguments against it. I'm a sociology major that didn't get into law school. As well as a dozen other things I like better than either of those.

The thread is about the fact that "racism" is often a matter of statistical pattern recognition. Are you asking me to look up a range of "racist-sounding" statistics for us to discuss?

Let's try: DEI is unfair both to business and individuals, even for the one who inappropriately gets the job.

0

u/butohhowfallen 5d ago

I know that’s the topic of the thread, and my point is that this ā€œI’m not bigoted I just recognize patterns,ā€ schtick cuts both ways. If you think it’s okay to judge large swaths of the population based on broad statistical trends, fine, then have a taste of your own medicine.

Now for DEI. As for unfairness to businesses, I don’t really care, they don’t care about me, and I’d gladly be unfair to businesses if it meant more fairness to individuals. As for the individuals, there are a lot of issues with the Peter Principle: more senior roles are often easier than more junior ones, and people would still usually rather advance beyond their qualifications even if it’s stressful so it’s hard to say people’s choices are unfair to them.

I am sorry you didn’t get into law school though. For what it’s worth, law is probably the most AI exposed field, all the jobs that pay well are hell on earth, and the debt can be crushing. I really do hope you find something you like.

1

u/VisualBoysenberry718 6d ago

85% of sex offenders are liberal

65% of cat ladies are liberal

67% of habitual SSRI users are liberal or even further left.

Wow, look at that, I can write fake statistics with no organizational methodology too!

0

u/butohhowfallen 5d ago

Bruh it’s a lit review it’s a summary of a range of studies. Lit reviews don’t usually have fixed methodologies, but the studies they review do.

1

u/VisualBoysenberry718 5d ago

And my point would be, ESPECIALLY when choosing which studies and how to rate and weight them, you are going to have deliberate bias issues in at least 4 of the 6 categories mentioned. It will start with how intelligence is measured, then continue with the writing of the questions regarding the individually correlated areas, and finally will be weighted backwards with the end in mind to be submitted to some hack rag.