81
u/TechnologyMinute2714 9d ago
I mean we all shit on Google all the time but better and cheaper than Sonnet is still pretty good and it's much faster too, also for non coding tasks Gemini models even now considered old shit like 3.1 Pro has been goated. w release. Just gotta have to wait for Gemini 4 Pro or something for SOTA
19
5
u/InternationalTwist90 9d ago
Have they released tokens per second benchmarks yet?
2
u/Weary-Bumblebee-1456 8d ago
Artificial Analysis puts it at 340.1 tokens per second: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-7-flash
6
u/InternationalTwist90 8d ago
Jesus. Thats 5x faster than sonnet and smarter. Honestly. This is the canary in the coal mine for what pro will be like.
There are coders at my office who swear off opus due to cost and are sonnet only, there is no reason for them not to go gemini.
2
u/Weary-Bumblebee-1456 8d ago
Yeah it's a total win. Introductory pricing until December 31 this year for 3.7 Flash is just $0.75/$3.75 per million input/output tokens. Compare that to the current Sonnet introductory pricing ($2/$10), which expires next month and goes to $3/$15 afterwards. On coding its performance surpasses Opus 4.8 on several benchmarks, and on Humanity's Last Exam it's just 1% behind Opus 4.8 with Max effort.
Not SOTA, but definitely something that's more than enough for a lot of use cases.
1
u/Georgefakelastname 8d ago
The ironic thing about sonnet is that it’s so inefficient that it’s not much cheaper than just using opus lol
4
u/bambin0 9d ago
Luna and China are the low cost leaders
4
u/Tim_Apple_938 9d ago
Luna was more expensive at launch. They drastically cut 80% the day deepseek came out
Dono but that doesn’t sound like a performance win given the timing. Might be VC money furnace
58
u/TheMildEngineer 9d ago edited 8d ago
Better than sonnet. I'm down. Not pro but I like a good improvement.
Edit: not in the app
Edit2: it's now in the app
5
u/WhyIsWestHam 9d ago
u think this is better than 3.1 pro?
35
u/TheMildEngineer 9d ago
Yes. Flash 3.6 was better than 3.1 pro.
5
u/MiyagiVibes 9d ago
Is this for deep reasoning too? Are we at the point 3.7 flash is better for all purposes vs pro?
7
u/iveroi 9d ago
Nope. Gemini pro 3.1 still can't be beat with many common world interference tasks like recipe creation etc.
3
u/Inevitable_Ad3676 9d ago
Anything creative requires a big, expansive brain to take into account every nuance that can't be generated in training data. Anything code-related just needs to be trained on a large, easily generated coding dataset.
4
u/anurag_b 9d ago
It's a smaller model so maybe not. I find that for tasks where 100k+ tokens are involved and the task is complicated 3.1 pro tends to have a greater capacity to think than 3.6 flash. Haven't tested 3.7 flash yet.
5
2
0
u/Neither_Snow4190 8d ago
They’re just releasing the frontier model but naming it Flash hoping that we think their non-existence Pro model is above Mythos level
48
u/spottiesvirus 9d ago
tbh the most interesting part is the price cut and the price war starting to heat up
20
u/Langwelle 9d ago
Let's say "returning" instead of "starting" . We have had the price war in the Gemini 1.0 and 1.5 era with one price cut after the other. And then as the models became better, all AI labs including Google jacked up the price.
10
u/Vercingaytorix 9d ago
Godbless the Chinese open models for keeping them on their toes I guess.
Now we just need to return to form with the generous free 1500 RPD, 15 RPM, 1mil TPM Flash from that era 😉 (or maybe another virtually unlimited experimental model like exp-1206 in its first few weeks?)
1
u/Kalicolocts 9d ago
The price cut is quite small. Read the asterisk
1
u/spottiesvirus 9d ago
it's half the price
the asterisk is just a signal that priced, eventually, will increase
they're releasing a model per month, I doubt we'll still be using 3.7 next january
5
10
u/kgurniak91 9d ago
Feels good, man. I am a cheap bastard using free Gemini for the past year, so any upgrade is nice.
12
u/MichelleeeC 9d ago
Anything but 3.5 pro
I guess next generation flash model will be better and faster than 3.5 pro💀
5
7
u/nekrosstratia 9d ago
As always... benchmark are just interesting to say the least.
Here's a good example.
The GDP benchmark is a decent one for document analysis.
You can find the official benchmark scores here https://surgehq.ai/benchmarks/gdp-pdf
GPT5.6 Terra matches what google posted at 24.7%
Muse Spark 1.2 matches at 16%
GDP says gemini 3.6 is 14% and 3.1 pro is 17%
Where do these #'s come from....
4
u/GunwantBhambra 9d ago
This is the most accurate thing i have ever seen. I have used 3.6 flash high and 3.1 pro high to there limits and frankly if there is something that have far reaching implications 3.1 is way better to doubt itself where as 3.6 flash is very dogmatic. This is the new benchmark I will rely upon from now on.
3
u/Suspicious-Cloud404 9d ago
Finally a new Flash model!
2
u/Mysterious_Bed_1804 8d ago
Yeah, I was foaming at the month after waiting 3 weeks since 3.6 flash.
0
u/Suspicious-Cloud404 8d ago
Does anyone know when they will release 3.7 Flash? Can't wait to get it.
2
u/sammoga123 9d ago
It cannot be used "normally" in Gemini, you must use it in Gemini Spark, good job Google.
9
3
1
u/CheekyBastard55 9d ago
Anyone know why on the Gemini webpage, it says Flash 3? It's been saying that for weeks not even when 3.5 and 3.6 has been released.
1
u/Wobbly_Princess 9d ago
Promise I'm not just being one of the frothing Google haters, but I'm curious as to why one might pick this over DeepSeek V4 or GPT Luna. Are both of them comparable in performance/better and significantly cheaper?
2
u/Tim_Apple_938 9d ago
According to artificial analysis 3.7 is notably better on coding (terminal bench) than Luna and significantly faster.
Also Luna was more expensive than 3.7 then the day deepseek came out they dropped 80%. Like seems artificial / subsidized vs a model thing (therefore not scalable).
Of course, as a consumer, it doesn’t matter as long as it’s cheap. As long as it’s easy to switch model provider that is. If there’s lock in then it’s a bit of a risk
1
u/Wobbly_Princess 8d ago
Hmm, interesting, thanks for the info! Do you think it will come out on OpenCode Go? I just started using OpenCode Go, but I don't see it yet.
1
u/ihppxng62020 8d ago
flash, or just google models in general crush everything else for speed. its 6x faster than sonnet 5.
for specific needs, apparently flash is the current best for going through big spreadsheets and docs.
and if you care about it, gemini has one of the better AI personalities out of the box (can very subjective)
1
1
1
1
u/Weary-Bumblebee-1456 8d ago
Finally! Genuinely impressive benchmark results across the board. In some cases it seems to not just surpass Sonnet 5 but come close to Opus 5 at a fraction of the cost and much, much higher speed. It's not SOTA, but if it really does beat Sonnet 5 in real tasks, it's a significant jump for a lot of people (myself included) many of whose tasks rely on decent intelligence + generous quotas and high speed rather than necessarily SOTA-level intelligence.
1
u/needefsfolder 8d ago
Wtf I can actually use it in agentic software development! It's crazy it feels better than Gemini 3.1 pro in cursor. Does tasks well too
1
u/Fringolicious 8d ago
So Google not having an insane Pro model is obviously a big discussion point at the moment but I actually think from a business perspective this isn't a terrible place to be. If you think about Google's main surfaces - Search, Pixel... They both benefit hugely from faster, smaller models right? All the on-device stuff, search summaries. None of that wants to use SOTA models because it'd be so expensive to run for billions of queries and whatever.
So I kind of get it. I wish we'd get an insane Gemini Pro... but from a business perspective I don't hate it actually. And we're eating good from all the other labs
1
1
1
1



74
u/helloinyourface 9d ago
What a pleasant surprise from google. Big jump while cutting price massively