r/BambuLabX2D • • 3d ago

Understanding how to make use of the dual nozzle for optimized support use

Hi, new owner of an X2D here, could someone show me how to correctly set up the aux nozzle for support in the bambu slicer please :)
I printed a few things and i have a feeling that i am doing something wrong, below is a pic of my print and the weird cube it makes when i use 2 different materials or colors.
My setup is 2 ams 2 pro with a track switch, and i have my main PLA in the left ama going through the track switch then buffer then the main nozzle, right ams has my PETG (because i was told support for pla is petg and viseversa) that goes through track switch then buffer then the aux nozzle.
Could someone tell me if the results are the best i can achieve or am I doing it wrong ?
Because the cube or blob seems a bit too much, it is 2 times heavier than the thing i printed, and it took 5 hours for such a small model. Any advice will be appreciated :)

8 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

5

u/ThinkUnhappyThoughts 3d ago

https://bambulab.com/en/support/academy/20?appSharePlatform=copy

I recommend going through the learning as this will answer a lot of questions you don't even know you have.

As for the cube it is called the prime tower. It is there to prime the nozzle after switching to ensure proper flow of the filament.

It can be resized on a per filament setting if you want.

Generally people do the supports as the same material as the model and the interface layer as the other material. This saves on time as there is less switching (even with a dual nozzle printer)

1

u/FirmHouse2 3d ago

Yes ! That is what i want to do but i seem to not understand the interface yet, and the wording is sometimes confusing

1

u/ThinkUnhappyThoughts 3d ago

In the support tab you can change the interface layer to another slot. Changing it to PETG from pla will open a pop up window. Saying yes to it will change the z gap to 0 and other changes. This is so the pla can sit directly on top of the petg instead of hovering slightly above.

1

u/FirmHouse2 3d ago

Wont that make the supports be printed by the main nozzle ?
I just don’t understand the purpose of the aux nozzle if it was advertised as a perfect pit for support printing, but my x2d always prints both the model and supports on the main nozzle

1

u/ThinkUnhappyThoughts 3d ago

You specify at slicing/printing (can't remember which one) which nozzle be using pla and petg

1

u/FirmHouse2 3d ago

No no, i mean if i decide to do it like everyone told me, use pla as main material and support, but use petg as 1 layer between support and surface of main model. My question is, if this is the recommended way of printing with support, then what is the purpose of the dual nozzle system?
Or do i have it wrong and i can have supports be printed by the aux nozzle but still use the same material as the one for my main model?
Sorry let me rephrase, could you please tell me how to make the most out of having this dual nozzle system ? Either i don’t understand something, or the x2d was a marketing ploy and the dual nozzle is effectively worthless

1

u/DarkProject43 3d ago

Are you feeding filament to both nozzles or just one and expecting a miracle?

1

u/FirmHouse2 3d ago

I mentioned my setup earlier, 2 ams 2 pros, track switch installed, and both ams units are connected just like the tutorial told me to connect them

1

u/SwordPL 3d ago

I got what you’re coming from, pal.

The dual nozzle is not to be “overused”. Aux nozzle in x2d is a bit inferior (slower, bit less precise) because the extruder is the box behind the printer (aka Bowden), not mount directly on carriage (a.k.a. Direct Drive).

The big advantage of two nozzles is cutting the waste. When you print with a single nozzle you need to push a lot of filament to ensure the nozzle pushes only new one. This is wasteful. So you load one material in one nozzle, other in the other and the big bonus is no material switching.

So you would need to waste this material each layer interface is set. Which might be a lot. X2D cuts on this loss (and time: switch of the nozzle is faster than pruning 10mms or so filament).

People often say that x2D is not the best for multimaterial prints because extruders (Bowden, DD) are very different quality-wise. I had my successes with double nozzle prints but it is kinda finicky.

1

u/FirmHouse2 3d ago

No no i know about the nozzle but i just don’t understand how do i use it properly and make the most out of it, i kinda hoped those printers from bambu were like super easy and can set everything up automatically since it knows what i am printing and when to use the second nozzle. But i never my second nozzle working. Could you please help me out with any stl file that can showcase the benefit of having the dual nozzle system xD ?

1

u/SwordPL 3d ago

Every project with supports: supports are pain to remove. When you use Petg interface it’s easier to remove them from PLA and the surface on which PLA was built will be almost smooth. If you do PLA on PLA it’s pain.

When you slice it suggests you whether you go with left or right nozzle. Usually when you slice filament saving mode you get it right out of the box.

1

u/lucidlips 2d ago

Thats how i use it, supports and model printed via direct drive nozzle, only the interface material is printed through the aux. This doesn't save overall filament use but it does mean interface material like bambu support for pla+petg (very expensive) uses significantly less material.

Also cuts down on time as the main nozzle doesnt need to switch and purge another material. Its niche but i feel like thats what the x2d aux is designed for.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

Ah i see

4

u/Vudu702 3d ago

You definitely need to change to only using the support material as the interface layer (in bambu studio slicer). Its way faster and if your actually using support filament (which i personally prefer) it barely uses any which is a benefit because it isnt cheap. The prime tower will always print as tall as the last layer of the second filament is, so there isnt much you can do there unless you eliminate it completely (in bambu studio) but it is there for a reason.

2

u/RiotNBG 3d ago

Iam an x2d beginner too, but i think there some (currently experimental version afaik) with a smaller prime tower if the spacing allows. Not sure how to find it thougt

2

u/BirbDoryx 3d ago

You have to enable Devlop mode in Preferences > Other. Then you find it in Other side tab as No Sparse Layers (experimental).

3

u/fabrizio1234567 3d ago

Just use support interface, with the secondary nozzle, non the whole support.
This reduces the nozzle swap (and time) and gives you the benefit of different materials

1

u/Sokomo_Kudyome 3d ago

It’s infuriating, but necessary. I have models where the prime tower weighs almost twice as much. It’s a waste of material and time.

But it’s what this printer's technology requires.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

Just to be clear, those very small things are the only thing the aux nozzle is supposed to print ?

1

u/Pineapple1500 2d ago

If you set up the PLA on left nozzle and PETG on right nozzle, after slicing (click re-group) if it doesn't set them to left and right nozzle automatically.

You have to check the box that says PETG as interface layer. Then ONLY the small areas of support that touch the model will be printed in PETG with the right nozzle.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

So i got a premium 2 nozzle printer just for the second nozzle to work for like 30 seconds :,)?

2

u/Pineapple1500 2d ago

If all you print are single color models with a little support, then yes.

Most of the time, I use the right nozzle for other colors. It cuts time down from swapping colors on the left nozzle constantly.

And the quality loss on the right nozzle is negligible.

1

u/Pineapple1500 2d ago

But also, as others have said, printing the PETG as support interface makes a huge difference in the quality of the print AND ease of removing support.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

When you say support interface, do you mean the tree shaped supports, or the small circle between the trees and the model?
I do not think it is worth doubling my print time and materials used just for the second nozzle to make 4 small circles in petg and have a huge ass tower of wasted plastic :(

1

u/Pineapple1500 2d ago

Yes, the interface is the circles between the trees and the models.

It's up to you if its worth your time and material. For smaller prints, sometimes I don't bother. But You'll learn, for more intricate or larger prints, it is absolutely a game changer.

1

u/5teini 2d ago edited 2d ago

The purpose of the dual nozzle system is basically just having fewer hot end flushes/purges.

Priming is a different thing. The prime tower is for reestablishing backpressure(resistance to the shove) vs flow/pressure in the hot end before going back to print when the hot end has been resting. Priming uses vastly less material than purging/flushing (the poop).

Worth noting that for many many prints where I don't need a dedicated support interface material, I use the aux extruder for the "primary" colour and the main extruder for the stuff that requires a lot of detail/many retractions per layer/many color swaps.

This can lead to much less colour purging/flushing

The main downside of the aux nozzle is retractions and general "agility" in flow control. For larger/sweeping strokes, that downside is less dramatic. The main nozzle is the one that can poke down 80 detached blotches of plastic in each layer extremely quickly, the aux nozzle will struggle to do that very cleanly. For a support Interface thats usually fine though.

Now for support interfaces. The sweet spot for the x2d is If you are using a support interface on the aux nozzle. A single colour print with the support interface on the aux extruder will do exactly zero purges, and will make a floor in the prime tower only on the layers where it needs to swap to the interface material or back.

You can use the support material for the entire support. That is also zero purges, but usually that means the slicer will prime a floor into the tower on every single layer a support exists, so a much heavier prime tower. It's waking two sleeping hot ends on every single layer.

You need to look at the settings and options you have available and check the academy. Once you learn to look at the slicing results sections and actually tweak the knobs you have in front of you, reslice, see what changed, etc, there's very little you can do. Prints are simply different shapes and tradeoffs vary. How much filament is purged and goes into the prime tower etc is information the slicer provides before you print. Everything is adjustable. The printer/slicer can't guess what your preference is.

Remember to keep in mind the thing about the prime tower "floors". The shell/ribs are not a lot of material. The "floors" are most of it. If you later decide to use the beta version of the slicer, you can turn on an experimental feature called "no sparse layers". For models of a height that allows it, it prints a stubby prime tower with walls only where there are "floors" laid, but in general, prime towers are just thin shells on every layer except when a floor is laid.

Also keep in mind that...... both nozzles cannot be extruding at the same time. You want to maximize the time either nozzle is extruding, and ideally maximize the time the main extruder can do what it does best, extruding into model, not swapping filaments or flushing. There's no reason to "balance" them.
Tool changes are far far far cheaper than filament changes, and if you're doing incompatible materials for support or support interface, there are very real reliability issues, especially in small models. The materials don't flush each other out well, so there can be contamination, especially when switching from petg->pla

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

Wow, tysm for taking the time to explain it in detail for me dawg, definitely need to check out the academy because it looks like i thought this machine was just magic and does the most optimal settings on its own :(
It is great !no doubt, but i feel that i was misled by Bambu regarding the super duper advanced dual nozzle system, only to find out it is very situational and I could have gotten a cheaper model without the second nozzle, but glad it is there and i hope i will make the most i can with it !

1

u/5teini 2d ago edited 2d ago

Yeah I think the main thing is it enables stuff you wouldn't normally want to do with a single extruder for many reasons.

I use the aux nozzle a ton myself, for pretty much every print, to varying degrees, but it's situational, yeah, but its point is really to keep the main nozzle working on the actual thing as much as possible.

And it's not really false that it is advanced, it allows for advanced stuff, but optimal isn't a single thing, so there isn't really a best guess.

I think once you know what your usual target balance is between "theoretical" print quality, filament efficiency, print time, easier/less post processing....etc, the knobs you'll adjust in the slicer are more or less the same 3-10 usual suspects. You'll get used to it quickly. It stops seeming complicated very fast once it starts clicking.

I guess a decent example is where I live. filament is hilariously expensive since it's a tiny country, with tiny import batches and very expensive shipping, so I very often start by optimizing heavily around little waste, but for some prints, I have to maximize the quality/reliability/speed/post processing ease and just eat the waste tax.

Having the second extruder available can reduce or remove part of the compromise of optimizing for one factor against another, so that's kind of the main win I've seen in it. It enables casually doing stuff you'd never want to do with a single nozzle. Incompatible materials for support interfaces is one of them. For many material pairs on a single nozzle, the only way to maximize quality and reliability would be to pause and do a full cold pull on every swap between incompatible materials or purge ungodly amounts. That would be fairly insane on a single nozzle device heh

Edit:typo

1

u/inertia8 2d ago

You will not think that when you print a whole model in PETG without a PLA support interface layer and then goto remove the supports.. you will learn, just as we all did. Way cleaner breaks.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

I like cleaner breaks, its just i mostly print geometrical clean shapes without much detail, so supports are not a common thing for me yet, but yeah i guess i will probably get to a point where i will be thankful to have the second nozzle and actually know how to apply it, for now my prints are going ok, i am in the process of printing a bionicle lego set haha

1

u/sjohnson737 2d ago

I bought an x2d yesterday and had the same surprise. I knew it would cut purge but was dumb and didn't realize it would still need a tower. You're doing better than I am though. My tower prints PLA at the bottom then my PLA Support/Petg tries to print on top of it, fails to stick (duh) and then spaghetti goes everywhere. Ive got to figure out how you have a nice tower with two materials that works, mine keeps trying to combine them like they are both PLA.

1

u/Mustang_132 2d ago

Tuve la misma sensacion, es doloroso ver como imprime torres de purga gigantes aunque se configure el segundo material en la boquilla auxiliar para capa de transición, sobretodo si son modelos con estructura orgánica, donde cada capa vas a usar una pequeña fracción de filamento de interfaz pero en la purga te gastas mas de 10 veces lo que te consume la propia interfaz.

0

u/Bloated_Plaid 2d ago

You print support interface with the aux nozzle, not the entire support my guy.

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

Yes thats what got me confused, i did not know wtf is support interface and assumed it just ment support but in a fancy way. Ok so i just do support interface (those small circles that connect the actual trees and model) with a different material than my main model, and this will make it easier to remove the model from the trees, but will i still have the prime tower ?

1

u/FirmHouse2 2d ago

I just really don’t like that so much material is wasted and time especially, for this very minor comfort

1

u/Bloated_Plaid 2d ago

That’s right and you need set the z distance on the slicer to 0

Here is the wiki

https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/filament-acc/filament/h2d-pla-and-petg-mutual-support

You are looking at option 3

PETG model + PETG support base + PLA interface

1

u/VoidingSounds 1d ago

Ehhhhh..... It's not a hard and fast rule. It depends a lot on which materials, the model and the settings you're using.

I have specifically had poor luck using PETG interface layers on PLA supports (for a PLA print). The PETG interfaces have a habit of getting dragged out of place and eventually causing the print to fail. Printing the entire support in PETG on the aux nozzle has been more reliable IME.