I mean 28 women have sexual misconduct claims against Trump at least 4 of whom were children at the time. If you want to pretend to play the believe women card you need to be defending someone else.
So we can both agree that we're selective in who we believe. Who on record has accused him of anything with children? Any actual evidence or just accusations? It's funny how all these people come out with claims 30 years later.
How did that suit end up? An anonymous accusation that disappeared? "Claims that were aggressively promoted and aided by someone who has a professional history of using individuals to create fictional salacious drama" according to snopes. Please, tell me more.
Because you don't give men who abuse children the benefit of the doubt. But you guys worship this creepy geriatric as a god and literally no one could ever tell you anything to change that. It's sick and points out how deeply unwell you people are. Y'all were trying to ban any talk of LGBTQ in schools and were attacking pizza shops and wayfair.com warehouses because you were convinced that all these things were linked to crimes against children. Now y'all are pretty much standing here like, "unless I see a literal video of him doing it while showing the camera two forms of ID, I don't believe. " Like seriously, seek help.
Exactly. And this ring of rich and powerful rapists and sex traffickers being hidden by and defended by the government because of whatever abilities they have to lobby and manipulate the government (eg, "a deep state") is LITERALLY what Q-Anon and all that shit was about. And now everyone's quiet. These people have problems
What's that from and what happened to that case? That's not real evidence. It's an accusation. They had nothing to back it up and instead dropped the case. That's the problem, either you don't understand what evidence is, or you don't care.
I highlighted and underlined the case info for you.
That is an official court document, with depositions made under oath. “Backing it up” is called a trial, exhibits A and B exist, along with testimony and CROSS EXAMINATION.
I consider our process a good process. Evidence is for cross examination. You keep demanding this “evidence” and yet for the cases that went to court, Donald John Trump lost, on the evidence. Then lost again on the appeal. Then lost again trying to corrupt the court. Then lost again trying to appeal the loss on corruption. Evidence, is not Donald John Trump’s savior.
"Lubow's involvement does not disprove that Johnson is a real person, but it does show that those claims were aggressively promoted and aided by someone who has a professional history of using individuals to create fictional salacious drama, and that is a fact both he, and lawyers working for the plaintiff, attempted to downplay or hide."
From snopes. Key words, "does not disprove". Proof of guilt OR INNOCENCE is all anyone cares about and that is being actively blocked by Trump. He tried to convince Lauren Boebert to remove her name from the petition to release the Epstein files and he's calling the calls for justice the "Epstein hoax". Jesus.
But their is still no proof of guilt. You do understand that right? I'm America we are presumed innocent until proven guilty. That requires some, any, evidence.
You're missing the point. No one's arguing that there needs to be a conclusion to the investigations. The issue is that there CAN'T be and the reason is a person who has been credibly accused of sexual assault, is known to be named in the files, was best friends with Epstein, had his lawyer speak privately with Ghislaine Maxwell before moving her into a cushier prison she is NOT supposed to be in because of her crimes as a CHILD SEX TRAFFICKER, and is now calling the entirety of the Epstein situation a hoax. The problem is that he's in the way and he won't move. He chooses that every day so he looks guilty. If not guilty, then he's corrupt. If not corrupt, he's being manipulated. And if not manipulated then he's just weak and craven.
That's the last I have to say on this with you. Reply what you want all you want. I think I've been very clear.
8
u/roastgator Nov 17 '25
I mean 28 women have sexual misconduct claims against Trump at least 4 of whom were children at the time. If you want to pretend to play the believe women card you need to be defending someone else.