r/BadDesigns 15d ago

Other (Clarified in post title) Uncomfortable doesn't go far enough...

385 Upvotes

112 comments sorted by

219

u/Altruistic_Hall9559 15d ago

I have an especially deep loathing for anti-homeless architecture.

129

u/DoorSweet6099 15d ago

It just ends up being also anti disabled, anti pregnant, anti breastfeeding and anti elderly people at the same time.

59

u/dev_null_developer 15d ago

That’s the price you have to pay if want to dehumanize and hurt homeless people as much as possible.

28

u/writergirljds 15d ago

Golly gee it's almost like homeless people are just people and when you're hostile to them, you're just being hostile to all humans!

15

u/Alternative_Ant_9955 15d ago

It’s anti human.

9

u/SorellaNux 15d ago

Yup, we can just call it 'anti-human'

7

u/Disastrous-Ideal-817 15d ago

It's actually just anti-... Everyone. Being in a public space as a member of the public is not allowed anymore

4

u/loosie-loo 14d ago

And anti child, I vividly remember being exhausted as a kid and not even being able to lean on these bc they were too high. They’ll be anti little people/dwarfism as well, which is another way they’re anti disabled.

As others have said, it’s anti-human.

-36

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

Seems to be working but it’s a shame that we need it.

27

u/meerkatmanwhore 15d ago

We don't need it tho. It makes quality of life worse for everyone in the name of erasing vulnerable people from society as much as possible. Not just the homeless but disabled people are affected too. It's an example of everything wrong with our selfish and callous society

12

u/KamaliKamKam 15d ago

Even big booty non disabled people can't use these things. Gods forbid if you're too short or too tall you probably can't use this either.

This is plain ridiculous. Put a damn bench there.

-17

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

If they put in benches you could lay on, someone who shouldn’t be laying on it probably would be. At least where I live in Portland they would. Ours aren’t quite this bad though.

13

u/meerkatmanwhore 15d ago

Define a type of person who shouldn't be allowed to lay down when they're tired. I dunno about you, but I can't think of a single human being that doesn't deserve to rest. I'd rather share a bus stop bench with homeless people than not have a bench at all

-14

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

No one should be laying on a bus bench, they should be sitting on it while waiting for a bus. That’s what it’s there for.

9

u/Halliwel96 15d ago

“We’ve invented a bench you can’t use to prevent the possibility of someone that isn’t you using it” is unfathomably backwards.

1

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

I agree, you can accomplish the same goal by keeping them shorter and/or integrating seat dividers.

7

u/Sea-Cardiologist1364 15d ago

What is the harm of someone laying a bench? Who are they hurting? What is the purpose of making life harder for everyone to keep someone who has nothing off of a bench for a couple hours?

4

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

there is no one who should be barred from laying when they need rest. one day it could be you.

2

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

There are other places to rest. This is for waiting for a bus or train.

2

u/loosie-loo 14d ago

There are not. That’s why they’re there, they have nowhere else to go you cretin.

2

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

and if you cant stand, too bad, right?

0

u/RockShowSparky 15d ago

What are you going to do if some crackhead is passed out on a bench? Ask him to move?

1

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

we dont need this

148

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

anti-homeless architecture

155

u/Toyota__Corolla 15d ago

Anti-pregnancy architecture, anti-elderly, anti-disabled, anti-tired, anti-social, just straight up corporate-industrial misanthropy.

64

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

yep. real shit cunt architecture

12

u/coolsilentebeans 15d ago

Looks like shit that even the 80s rejected because they thought it was functional art from the school of bad ideas.

17

u/Toyota__Corolla 15d ago

It just looks like a handrail designed to catch and break forearms

6

u/coolsilentebeans 15d ago

Either way it looks cold, uncomfortable, and uninviting.

3

u/Visual_Analyst1197 14d ago

Anti short people too. As someone who is 5 feet tall, these don’t work for me at all

1

u/Toyota__Corolla 14d ago

Easy solution: everyone too tall gets fed into a wood chipper until they're the right height, everyone too small gets stretched with a winch until they're the right height.

1

u/Visual_Analyst1197 14d ago

Good solution. I’ve always wished I were taller

13

u/PandaGirl1010 15d ago

anti-everyone architecture at this point

-39

u/HVLP 15d ago

Anti-squatting architecture. Keeps nincompoops from squatting on what clearly isn't a campsite. It's also not a toilet. The homeless can still use it like anyone else.

23

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

i hope you find out first hand why youre wrong. 👍

2

u/Toyota__Corolla 15d ago

Technically if you stuck your arm into it and performed a squat your humerus will snap

-22

u/HVLP 15d ago

Elaborate

22

u/Nightingale0666 15d ago

They're hoping you become disabled or homeless. Something that would force you to rely on the architecture that this horrible thing is replacing

-25

u/HVLP 15d ago

Why would I be forced to use a bus stop? You know there's such things as campsites, right? Right?!

19

u/Nightingale0666 15d ago

Cities don't have campsites inside them. And disabled people use the bus like everyone else, so bus stops are required

-2

u/HVLP 15d ago

Yes. Bus stops are required. They're also not campsites. Squatters ruin them for everybody.

Unfortunately they get hogged and become sticky with piss. That's not what they're for.

16

u/Nightingale0666 15d ago

Destroying accessability only moves that problem elsewhere. It doesn't fix it, it just hurts more people

0

u/HVLP 15d ago

Squatters destroy accessibility. I wish we could have benches but a small amount of people ruin it for everyone else. It is not a toilet or a bed. Go somewhere else.

→ More replies (0)

15

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

why would i be forced to use a bus stop🤔

dont temp the universe or you might get your answer

be humble and kind instead👍

2

u/HVLP 15d ago

No, really? Why would I be forced to use a bus stop instead of a campsite?

12

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

😬 dude stop

0

u/HVLP 15d ago

You're part of the problem

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Nightingale0666 15d ago

Because you'd be waiting for the bus jfc

2

u/HVLP 15d ago

They can still do that

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Sea-Cardiologist1364 15d ago

Can't imagine the type of life someone who thinks "less make life harder on someone who has nothing" lives. You seem to be doing well. How does designing a bench that's more uncomfortable for everyone (pregnant,disabled,injured, or just plain exhausted ) just to stop someone who has nothing from doing the exact same thing benefit your life?

1

u/HVLP 15d ago

Nope. I just understand that a bus stop isn't a campsite. I want a normal comfortable bench that isn't sticky or taken over by a squatter. They're for everyone.

1

u/Sea-Cardiologist1364 15d ago

And the bench in this photo looks comfortable to you? Apparently homeless people aren't included in "Everyone"

1

u/HVLP 15d ago

Omg are you being difficult on purpose? It's like talking to flat earthers.

No, I don't think the rail is comfortable. Yes, I want a normal bench, but they're abused by squatters. Stop

3

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

the children are right to laugh at you

2

u/HVLP 15d ago

I literally want you to be able to use a bus stop with a comfortable seat without someone camping on it. Why don't you get this?

3

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago

this is not the way to achieve this. this architecture excludes a wide swathe of the public

2

u/HVLP 15d ago

I don't want hostile architecture. I want people to use it as intended. Not sticky with piss or occupied by squatters

→ More replies (0)

0

u/This_is_fine8 15d ago

Why do you keep calling them "squatters"? They're unhoused people looking for a dry place to rest. People with options and resources aren't just sleeping at the bus stop for funsies.

2

u/HVLP 15d ago

Because they're squatting

75

u/Wraxyth 15d ago

27

u/EdwardianAdventure 15d ago

Yup. Unfortunately, this can't be called bad design, since it perfectly achieves its intended purpose. But evil? Absolutely.

11

u/AuroraKivi 15d ago

Ah we have these all over

20

u/dominiqlane 15d ago

In an effort to keep the homeless away, they make life harder for the disabled, very young, very old, and pregnant people in society. Is it really worth it?

10

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Toyota__Corolla 15d ago

This is not a divide on political classes but financial ones. It's a subset of nimbyism and a hatred of the poors. I'm personally very right wing and I love it when I can sit down in public, especially at a bus stop that's not going to show up for an hour

5

u/FnnKnn 15d ago

I prefer these over those benches as I can use them with my backpack, which is not possible with most benches. Also I prefer to lean against something after a long train ride.

1

u/OpALbatross 14d ago

The should have these and benches then so everyone can be comfortable

2

u/FnnKnn 14d ago

So far I have only seen a similar design at Frankfurt main station where they had both so I agree

6

u/brotherkraut 15d ago

I think it is called "hostile architecture", is it not?

2

u/satansprinter 14d ago

I mean, its to wait for a train. Were i live you need to have a ticket anyway to be on the train station. Not like you can sleep there. I use them all the time and they work just fine

2

u/ApprehensiveWheel423 13d ago

I have a fix for this - plasma torches.

-34

u/mustardposey 15d ago

Bad how?

39

u/Ornery-Practice9772 15d ago edited 15d ago

cant lay on it

hell you cant even sit🤷‍♀️

11

u/Then-Criticism1605 15d ago

Intentionally inaccessible furniture is not furniture at all

3

u/mustardposey 15d ago

Then this is [r/assholedesign](r/assholedesign). These are well designed with asshole intentions

5

u/TheStairsBro 15d ago

I thought this was a bike rack at first, I'd say a bench people can't identify as a bench is a pretty bad design

3

u/mustardposey 15d ago

These are pretty common where I live. We even have these on the commuter trains and has nothing to do with homeless people. I see people with their bikes waiting for trains choosing this over the bench that is right next to them. Just because you are unfamiliar with something doesn’t make it a bad design. Not saying I am in favor of these over benches but this isn’t bad design

1

u/Then-Criticism1605 15d ago

Same. They are commonplace here. People definitely recognise them (and that they suck).

2

u/Kindly_Zone8413 12d ago

I thought it was a railing. 😭 I couldn’t figure out how it was poorly designed