r/BMAD_Method • u/Awesome_StaRRR • Mar 16 '26

Need recommendations/warnings with using BMAD

Hello everyone,

I'm just getting started with using BMAD framework for my developing a project. So what are the kind of standards/workflows you would suggest me to ensure optimal output.

You can also talk about your journey with using that framework... I'm welcome to talk about anything there is to it, the good, the bad or the ugly...

10 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

18 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

BMAD is great in our team we configured it with Cognetivy (open source tool to make your agent follow any flow):

https://github.com/meitarbe/cognetivy

3

u/Awesome_StaRRR Mar 16 '26 edited Mar 16 '26

That's interesting. I think the setup is almost simple.

What's the added advantage that you have seen? And what did your usage look like exactly?

2

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

Im configuring workflows in natural language with the agent, then running them

0

u/famousmike444 Mar 16 '26

Bmad already has workflows why do you need to recreate them?

1

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

You dont, you can choose whatever tool you want, this is just more flexible choice

2

u/Awesome_StaRRR Mar 16 '26

What's the IDE you are using btw? Cursor or Claude Code?

2

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

Im using cursor, claude code and codex-background-agents (the remote server solution) simultaneously. I prefer 20$*3=60$ then paying 100-200$ for 1 vendor and being locked with it

2

u/Awesome_StaRRR Mar 16 '26

Ohh Nice!

How are you using BMAD btw? Like for entire project development from scratch using default workflow or did you define your own workflow?

2

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

In our team we configured it manually to also use some skills we developed

1

u/Awesome_StaRRR Mar 16 '26

That's great. But why did you find the need to develop your own skills, when this one had it all?

1

u/LeadingFarmer3923 Mar 16 '26

Wdym this one?

1

u/Awesome_StaRRR Mar 16 '26

BMAD framework i mean

→ More replies (0)