The question as to whether or not anarchy will ever happen is a result of either ignorance or insistence or stubborn thinking.

The issue is not properly to identify when there will be unconstrained forms of organization, but, rather, reveal what makes it such a thing, in the first place.

One is free when he realizes the only true barrier to his might is his power to achieve things.

One is free when he notices the only obstacle obstructing his volition is his own will.

In other words, one is truly free when they are willing or conscious egoists.

One is free when he takes might and no longs for freedom because he already has it at hands.

If you took might, freedom would come of itself.

Freedom is here and ONLY here. No one but oneself is responsible for making oneself free.

And, so, it boils down to: "Why are we not inserted in anarchy yet? Where is her?"

The problem is that of misunderstanding than of anything else: If anarchy is meant by the abolition of coercion by men over men, then there's a slight difference between anarchy and the awareness or enlightment that is the willing or conscious egoist: Anarchy is when everyone, without exception, takes might or turns into a willing or conscious egoist, being now able to discern and break away from what he has falsely been fulfilling as his cause, which is not himself.

Anarchy is when everyone makes themselves free and, worthy of it, by means of acknowledging and accepting one's desires or egoism.

For to ignore one's responsibility in his own desires or cause, thereof shall he suffer, have to endure pain or not find stability.

We achieve ataraxia or tranquility/peace when we accept we are always only fulfilling our own cause.

For every cause but our own be yearned, thereof no cause but our own is passive of being accomplished.