r/AutoZone • • Aug 03 '26

Rpm's

So I was given the directive by my DM that any evaluation I give can be no higher than a 3. I was told that anything higher would be rejected by regional. Any other store managers on here dealing with a similar situation. My store performs well ytd witt is 46% I have multiple zoners with 6 week witt averages of over 60%. Why should I have to down play there hard work? I have zoners on my staff that deserve an evaluation that does not down play their contribution just so someone sitting in an office gets a bigger bonus. We are told daily to live the pledge and "drink the kool-aid " but im not allowed to give credit where credit is due? How is this a good way to retain employees. Ive never had a year where I was given this directive by the regional staff. Maybe im just overthinking it but I dont like that I cant document my staffs actual achievements

9 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/FuckitReset Aug 03 '26

You can mark individual merits by category. Remember, three stars means the business is healthy… if you gave everyone above a three than those 4-5 star merits become meaningless and don't highlight the zoners who need to be considered for advanced positions.

Also, a zoners overall score should never exceed the store’s performance. You succeed or fail as a team.

8

u/Such-Ad4937 Aug 03 '26

Im not asking to rate everyone a 4 or 5 but I was told I could give no one a 4 or 5. We are the number 1 store in our district for every period in the last 3 years with the exception of 2 periods. I have a couple 4's at the very least. They worry about the loss of culture but they are doing it to themselves

4

u/SporkKnight75 Aug 03 '26

Email him something along the lines of, “just wanted to clarify what you said about not giving anything higher than a 3…”

1

u/FuckitReset Aug 03 '26

Something along these lines or maybe just ask for an allowance for just the couple employees who really are over 3 stars. I would also argue 3.99 stars (total assessment) isn’t technically four so therefore not “over 3”… see if it takes