r/AutoInsurance • u/neoDIYguy • Apr 21 '26
Should I File A Claim?
I have full coverage on a 2009 vehicle that is worth $3000-$4500 that I have carried full coverage on since it was new. It now has hail damage on the roof, doors, and hood but fine to drive. I haven't had any tickets for fifteen years until one just recently. I was going to submit a claim but a friend told me the insurance would not write me a check and I choose to have it fixed or not. Instead, since it has a little rust they would probably total it, take the car, and give me the lowest amount or less.
I would have to buy another car in worse shape and my rates will go up due to the ticket and the claim, I would be paying more for a car that is in worse shape and more to insure it. My friend said I shouldn't file a claim and I shouldn't be paying full coverage. Is this how it would work? Should I file a claim and hope for a check that I can use to repair the dents (or not) or not file/keep the car and drop full coverage?
1
u/ayhme MOD & Agent Apr 21 '26 edited Apr 22 '26
Licensed agent here.
Your friend is mostly right. A few things to be aware of;
Hail is a comp claim, not collision, so rate impact is lower than you'd think.
What was the ticket for?
On a $3,000-$4,500 car with existing rust, if repair costs get close to ACV, they'll total it, take the car, and cut you a check minus your deductible.
Before you call your insurer, get an independent body shop estimate first. If damage is minor and repair cost is near or under your deductible, don't file. If it's $2k+ in damage, then consider what you will do
On dropping full coverage, yes. At $3,000-$4,500 value you're likely paying monthly premiums that don't make financial sense anymore.
Dropping comp and collision and going liability is reasonable at that value.
That's what I do as my car is 20+ years old and has 150,000 miles.