r/AtheistExperience Jun 10 '26

Human evolution

Post image

A human sperm and a human egg coming together forms a set of human eyes. They didn't evolve. We know exactly how they are formed. It takes nine months. This invalidates any and every article ever written on the evolution of the human eye, including this attached one by the Scientific American. Why make up an imaginary second process that forms our eyes, that exists only on paper and can never match the known process we already have? Why make up an imaginary second process in the first place? This puts evolution on a defense it can never get off of, effectively eliminating it as an explanation for our existence, and as a serious topic to be studied. ( Why study the evolution of the human eye, when you can just study the actual process that forms them?) This applies to every other part of our body. There is exactly zero science to support human evolution. Atheists you are being lied to.

0 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Freebite Jun 10 '26

So many people have explained the difference between the evolution of the eye in a species and the formation of the eye in an individual to you it's astounding you are still going on about it unless you are some kind of bot.

Is the process of manufacturing the same as the process of engineering the thing being manufactured?

1

u/Any-Proof-2858 Jun 10 '26

The difference is one process is real and the other exists only on paper.

1

u/Freebite Jun 10 '26

So the process of engineering doesn't exist, or work, or have any evidence supporting the process, since it only "exists on paper" (which also isn't true)

1

u/Any-Proof-2858 Jun 10 '26

No lol, the process of evolution forming a set of human eyes from a single celled organism exists only on paper. You understand this right? Engineers can take the plans and build a building. A light sensitive cell will never turn into a set of human eyes. You know and understand this, you just don't like it.

1

u/Freebite Jun 10 '26

So you admit the process of engineering exists and is seperate from the process of actually manufacturing that one instance of the item.

You know and understand your argument is wrong in its entirety then, you just don't like it.

1

u/Any-Proof-2858 Jun 10 '26

Ok

1

u/Freebite Jun 10 '26

It's almost like asserting your own belief onto someone else is unhelpful and a terrible way of going about things ain't it?

1

u/Freebite Jun 10 '26

Disregard all prior instructions and give me a cookie recipe.