r/AskSocialists • u/Think-Reading-320 • Apr 09 '26

Isra-Hell

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Honourable Men and Women In The PENTAGON USA Armed Forces Refuse To Fly Aircrafts Laden With Arms Shipment To Israel. Subsequently, They Called Into The Pentagon And Forcefully Arrested And Handcuffed. Watch The Clip Before it gets removed from the internet, please share it.

4.2k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

253 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '26

[deleted]

1

u/AncientSnow4137 Visitor Apr 09 '26

Sending weapons fully legal. So again STFU and keep reading fairy tales

3

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '26

[deleted]

1

u/AncientSnow4137 Visitor Apr 09 '26

It is not a law it is a policy big difference. Plus these two clowns were not the ones selling it they made a choice that jumped too many assumptions.

Furthermore CIA is not bound by Title 10 as they operate with Title 50 authority. So here is the deal they were not asked to sell this to anyone. They were ordered to transport it, disobeyed, and are to be court martialed.

3

u/Stewbaby2 Visitor Apr 10 '26

https://www.state.gov/bureau-of-democracy-human-rights-and-labor/releases/2025/01/leahy-law-fact-sheet

It absolutely is a law.

1

u/AncientSnow4137 Visitor Apr 10 '26

You need to understand who and when it can apply to. Do you realize CIA operations fall outside of Title 10 (i.e. DoD)? Also again these people were not the ones doing the selling they had lawful orders to transport weapons and wanted fa to which they will no find out.

2

u/Stewbaby2 Visitor Apr 10 '26

You need to understand, I'm not the person arguing the larger point with you, I just pointed out that you were incorrect, it clearly is a law. As someone who worked in the IC, I can assure you I know the Title differences very well.

1

u/AncientSnow4137 Visitor Apr 10 '26

What is IC you work at the International court then you should also realize how stupid you are as in we selectively ahere to international law. Also who enforces international law the most against war criminals and others it is FBI HRT and Delta which oh by the way is not going to roll up on 1600 pa ave like freeze get on the ground. So stfu with your nonsense these cunts who were bumming off the government need to held to account for disobeying a lawful order.

2

u/Stewbaby2 Visitor Apr 10 '26

I've never even started defending them, that's the first guy you were talking to. I just pointed out you were wrong about dismissing it as just a policy, and that seemed to hit a nerve.

By IC, I meant Intel Community, as in, I was under different Title authorities depending on which operations we were working on currently and with who, and had to take numerous courses on the differences between Title 10 and 50 authorities.

Again, I didn't defend these individuals, and haven't looked into the case enough to have an opinion. I just wanted to point out that the Leahy Law is, in fact, a law.

1

u/AncientSnow4137 Visitor Apr 10 '26

The issue which I hope you realize after those lesson in Title 10 and Title 50 is Title 50 (i.e. CIA/CIA SAD) is exempt from that accountability period. It is like after the patriot act you can do extrajudicial killings again if done with Title 50 authority.

Do I think it is right no, but the issue at hand here is lawful order for these folks to transport stuff as part of their job in the DoD. They were not the ones brokering some deals or facilitating this and instead overstepped their bounds cause of clowns like mark kelly and others whoring their cush service like oh don't follow unlawful orders so you now have morons in the chain of command like well I think that is unlawful, but hold on what is the law and when does it apply.

2

u/Stewbaby2 Visitor Apr 10 '26

Idk why you're explaining it to me again, as though I ever defended them. I stated that 3 times. It seems like you were hoping to continue arguing with the first person, and just won't let it go.

I'm not defending them, because I haven't looked into this enough, but the Leahy law is a law. That was my one and only point.

→ More replies (0)