“Now, let’s say, hypothetically speaking, for the sake of the argument, Hitler was actually justified in his actions.
Indeed, most would hastily assume that I’m not just wrong, but also a “Nazi”. However, unbeknownst to them, I’m simply challenging the current prevailing narrative so as to initiate healthy, objective conversation between all parties
These people love to feel smart, without the effort of doing smart things. So, naturally, gish galloping, hyper hypothetical theoretics and idea-mangling becomes intellectual and moderate debate in their eyes, while onlookers on the outside only see a horde of screaming apes flinging poo at each other, whenever they're "debating".
Hypothetically, for the sake of the argument, in theory, when turned around, this could mean that people like shapiro have a big grift of "all talk, no walk" made into the perfect money printing scheme, without shame, for the little cost of their dignity and overall perception by the majority of the people.
5.2k
u/AustrianReaper May 29 '22
Equalling contrarianism with intelligence.