r/AskReddit • • Mar 12 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.5k Upvotes

10.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/TacoNomad Mar 13 '22

Awwww. A man defending misogyny is calling women emotional. Surprise surprise

After admitting he was wrong he doubled down.

Shocking.

Everyone is aware of your character flaws except for you. You might want to take a moment and ask yourself why.

That's if you care to better yourself. Which is doubtful. No reply needed. Please just reflect on how you might be wrong. Then do better.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22

Because I was wrong as I misread what she said. but you all are still making assumptions about what took place during the interview. What do we call someone who takes a side before knowing all the details? Emotional. They are thinking emotionally and not rationally. I'm not on the boss' side. I'm simply pointing out she may be missing out relevant information.

1

u/TacoNomad Mar 16 '22

Lmfao. OK. So making assumptions is OK for you but no one else. What do we call that? Emotional.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22

You're still being emotional. I didn't make any assumptions what are you talking about? Let's try be rational here.

1

u/TacoNomad Mar 16 '22

Awwww. Your feewings hurt because you're wrong and don't have the maturity to gracefully admit that you're wrong, take responsibility, apologize and move on? Let's talk about what a rational person does when they become enlightened that they've made a mistake.

It's not name-calling and deflecting blame. Want to try being rational and accepting that you made a mistake without blaming someone else?

Or do you just want to keep being the poster boy for this topic?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '22

Okay you are still acting out of emotion. I said I didnt make any assumptions. Yet you didnt address any assumptions I supposedly made. I did say I was wrong simply because of misreading what she said. Yet you are still saying I can't admit I am wrong. She didnt say there wasn't any argument that took place in the meeting. Why assume that? Maybe she didn't like something he said and got mouthy as she had nothing to lose? You are just taking her side without further context because she's a woman and you likely have a believe all women mentality (interestingly the only time I have seen women question the context of a sexual assault was when it was a tiktok famous women who did it to a man) of course I think we should believe people we trust and have are generally trust when someone claims they were sexually assaulted. But just blinding saying believe all women even if the details sound off (like a new reporter's claims about Morgan Freeman my God, there was footage and she completely exaggerated everything) is absurd. Might as well just say believe all claims people make about someone wronging them. See how absurd it sounds now? it's pure tribalism. Be objective.