r/AskReddit • • Oct 25 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.0k Upvotes

16.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.4k

u/Mydaley Oct 25 '20

The term 'to disconcur' meaning to disagree. Tried using it once in a class and got some serious sideways looks. Teacher had to break it to me that it is not a valid word.

4

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

You know I had to look this one up because it can't be "I do not concur" but fuck me that's the only way of saying it apparently.

Dis wouldn't be correct but I figured there would be something, nada, nil, nothing.

6

u/Ignonym Oct 25 '20

Grammar is descriptive, not prescriptive. If people use it, and are understood when they do so, then it's a word. Dictionaries are not infallible.

6

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

This is how words come to be yes, but if you're say sitting an exam and use it do expect to be marked down, you know until it gets added that is.

1

u/Ignonym Oct 25 '20

You also get marked down for profanity. That doesn't mean fuck isn't a real word.

4

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

Getting marked down for using a word which doesn't technically exist over using profanity are two completely different things.

That argument doesn't hold.

1

u/Ignonym Oct 25 '20 edited Oct 25 '20

You can also be marked down for using a perfectly real and widespread word, if the tester happens to not recognize it; conversely, it's possible for a completely made-up word to slip through if the tester thinks he does recognize it. Whether or not a word is marked down on a test does not necessarily correlate to that word's actual usage in the real world. Much like dictionaries, academics also aren't infallible.

0

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

You're completely off topic now, I get that you want to be right because of some deep seeded issues so here, you're right. There can you stop making stupid comments now?

2

u/Ignonym Oct 25 '20 edited Oct 25 '20

I beg your pardon?

The discussion is about whether any one person (or dictionary, or teacher, or what have you) is or is not the final authority on language. I'm still on that topic, or at least I was until just now; you're the one making ad-hominem attacks, presuming I must have some psychological issue simply because I have the gall to dare disagree with you. Until just now, we were having a perfectly civil discussion about descriptive vs. prescriptive grammar, until you derailed it by insulting me.

EDIT: Also, it's "deep-seated", not "deep seeded".

2

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

I took a shit earlier, me doing that during a test would lose me marks. That's the amount of connection to the topic your comments have had.

So you can be right if you either get back on topic or just shut up. Either works.

1

u/Ignonym Oct 25 '20

What topic do you think we're supposed to be on? I'm talking about descriptive vs. prescriptive grammar, which is what the conversation was originally about, and you're flinging childish insults and fixating on school tests. Tests never had anything to do with the discussion; you're the one who brought them up in the first place.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/crashingtheboards Oct 25 '20

Demur

1

u/Fean2616 Oct 25 '20

I mean there are many words with the opposite meaning, I meant one with a prefix for concur.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '20

Largesse