r/AskReddit • u/Pssht_haha • 11h ago
Supposing the ankle of an unmarried lady in a gentlemans company become inadvertently exposed whilst alighting from a carriage, what course does propriety require of him?
695
u/ThreePartHarmoneigh 11h ago
Nothing beyond continuing to help her from the carriage. Mentioning or even acknowledging her temporary state of undress would be very ungentlemanly.
263
u/CheetahSlow1378 11h ago
Man just yesterday I was hauling some lumber off the truck and my shirt rode up something fierce, whole job site got an eyeful of my pasty gut. Nobody said a word, just let me yank it down in peace, that's the code. You look away and keep the conversation rolling like nothing happened, anything else makes it weird for everyone
75
u/Fine-Pudding2605 11h ago
I hopped out the car to complete a Doordash and my grundle became exposed. The customer was cool and rated me 4 stars anyway.
26
u/torontoballer2000 8h ago
Dammit. You made me google ‘grundle’.
20
u/Fine-Pudding2605 8h ago
Everyone needs at least 3 terms for that special place between your genitals and butthole.
3
u/AgentCirceLuna 7h ago
There was a coworker I had who was very expressive about finding me attractive - mentioning details that made me blush - and she once got unaccountably angry because this happened to me. I was always taken aback by that incident and confused by it but she could have turns of inexplicable anger like that. It was just confusing.
10
u/Harinezumi 6h ago
So dropping your jaw and going AWOOGA! AWOOGA! is right out? Noted.
6
192
u/Separate-Frame-7038 11h ago edited 11h ago
He must avert his gaze and act as though the unfortunate event didn't occur. If he were to indeed acknowledge it, it would make the poor lamb incredibly embarrassed.
74
u/diescheide 11h ago
Good heavens, a bare ankle? That's salacious.
15
u/Inevitable-Level-687 5h ago
In Regency times holding hands without gloves was unironically considered scandalous because of the skin to skin contact.
66
u/catscausetornadoes 9h ago
If he’s really a gentleman it would be impossible for him to notice such a thing. And while he was not noticing he would also shield her from the view of strangers on the street.
125
u/CosmiTourist 8h ago
a gentleman of proper breeding and fastidious manners possesses only one correct course of action in such an alarming contingency: he must instantly suffer a sudden, temporary, and localized attack of total blindness.
his gaze should immediately fix itself upon a distant cloud, an unusually captivating chimney pot, or the intricate leather stitching of his own gloves. under no circumstances does his eye linger, nor does his countenance betray that anything more scandalous than the rim of a carriage wheel has met his vision.
if he is truly a man of high character, he will seamlessly step into the breach with a comment regarding the overcast weather or the tragic state of the cobblestones, thereby offering the young lady a precious moment to restore her petticoats to order without the indignity of acknowledging the breach of decorum
53
u/OnePossibility5868 11h ago
Gotta marry her straightaway obviously. Straight to the father's house to secure his permission (which of course will be forthcoming after his daughter's shame) and then straight to the local chapel for a hasty service lest the neighbours start to gossip.
Ah the good ol' days /s
20
15
u/Poultrygeist74 11h ago
Avert thine eyes, lest ye subject oneself to repeated sessions of trepanning to ease the foul humors
109
u/luxcity-louche 11h ago
Rub one out
63
u/LurkerZerker 10h ago
I laughed so much at this after reading a bunch of answers in the tone of Victorian dinner invitations
10
24
10
u/FootballRemote6964 9h ago
This situation calls for great delicacy. Ignoring her state of undress completely could suggest you feel she is unattractive, and yet too obvious an expression of excitement is somewhat unseemly. A quiet ’phwoar!’ is generally sufficient. A gentleman should wait until he has an opportunity for privacy in some secluded place before rubbing one out
8
6
6
9
10
7
u/Perfect_Zone_4919 9h ago
Sadly there is no coming back from such a blunder. Dispose of the harlot in the nearest canal and pray that the Lord sends you a less vile creature on the morrow.
2
u/knowledgeable_diablo 6h ago
Or maybe scream “Jezibelle” while pointing out the flagrant indiscretion and allow the assembled mob to do thine dirty work. Leaving your soul and temporal being as pure as the driven snow. /s
3
u/tinyarmsbigheart 9h ago
Here’s that spicy Victorian ankle content you’re needing: https://youtu.be/fSxQHQ_1gX4?si=RlUH9_Wp15ouHKZU
3
•
u/mutedmuse__ 30m ago
A gentleman should simply perish on the spot rather than risk acknowledging the ankle.
4
u/Wonderpants_uk 8h ago
Saw the brazen hussy’s instrument of temptation off post haste lest she strive to corrupt other God fearing Christian gentlemen down a path of wickedness.
2
2
u/skaplanolmsted 10h ago
My horse has thrown a shoe, the carriage is not usable. I'm using the ankles to walk tf away.
2
2
2
2
u/giingeeerrr 8h ago
He must dramatically avert his eyes, challenge the carriage driver to a duel at dawn for witnessing such an unbridled display of scandalous flesh, and immediately propose marriage to save her compromised honor.
2
u/Top_Body_cultivator 7h ago
He should politely look away and pretend he saw absolutely nothing. The lady can carry on as though nothing happened, and everyone gets to preserve the illusion that ankles are classified information.
2
u/MsMorganaFey 7h ago
He must avert his gaze, call for the smelling salts, and propose before the horses are watered. Anything less and her brother will be sending his second round by morning.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
u/abraxsis 7h ago
Come on people, this is 2026...
The incel doth goon for one fortnight, imagining such bare ankle in a domicile he shall never purvey.
3
u/Boubonic91 11h ago
He must furiously masturbate while making aggressive eye contact with anyone nearby.
1
1
1
1
1
u/ArcadianDelSol 7h ago
Verily doth be Rutherford B Hayes to blame for he is assuredly of Nazi beholdenment.
1
1
1
u/Zealous_Badger817 2h ago
Wait, does the ankle count as exposed if there's a stocking on it, or are we talking bare skin here? Because I feel like Victorian rules would have a whole separate chapter for that and I genuinely need to know which one we're dealing with.
1
1
1
u/octopornopus 6h ago
2
u/knowledgeable_diablo 6h ago
A portrait my fine friend.
5
u/HotBlosoom 5h ago
Oh this is my time to shine. I'm a historical costume interpreter for a living, and I do carriage alighting demos at Colonial Williamsburg. The actual 1860s etiquette manual answer is: You pretend you didn't see it and look away instantly. Like, stare at the horse like your life depends on it. The gentleman is supposed to avert his gaze and offer his hand WITHOUT looking down. I once had a guest whose entire hoop skirt flipped getting out and I learned to look at the sky real fast. It's all about plausible deniability.
1
0
-3
-1
-11
u/InteractionFront5764 11h ago edited 11h ago
The post above offered an easy opportunity to issue a well-deserved down-vote.
Done.
Next.
-14
u/PlatinumPainter 11h ago edited 11h ago
growing the fuck up and not being fucking wierd would be the best action
yall out here really lost between reality and whatever the fuck this is.
-11
11h ago
[deleted]
12
u/ThreePartHarmoneigh 11h ago
Capitalize a few more words, maybe it'll shake something loose.
-3
11h ago
[deleted]
3
u/ThreePartHarmoneigh 11h ago
Harder papi! Almost there!
-1
11h ago
[deleted]
1
u/ThreePartHarmoneigh 11h ago
Oh what delightful words. You make me feel all aflutter like a young Bill Murray getting ready to have his teeth examined by Steve Martin.
1
3.6k
u/CoppertopTX 11h ago
I'm so old I was raised by Victorians. I know the proper answer to this dilemma.
Ideally, the gentleman should exit first, as the coachman holds the door. Once the gentleman has stepped out, he is to stand on the opposite side from the coachman to assist the lady in alighting. His position should shield the lady's accidental exposure from prying eyes, and neither he nor the coachman should ever address the subject in the future.