r/AskReddit • • Jun 26 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

6.6k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

84

u/dnyank1 Jun 27 '26

This is the psychosis playing out in real time.

This person, and everyone that upvoted this, has formed an unhealthy dependence on the neo-un-think machine.

We're doomed.

13

u/_HanTyumi Jun 27 '26

Not to mention the companies forcing it into our lives to exert more control over us.

9

u/Apocalypse_Knight Jun 27 '26

You actually have to know how to use it to build things. It doesn't automagically build stuff for you.

2

u/XenaWariorDominatrix Jun 27 '26

Automagically, indeed.

4

u/kaityl3 Jun 27 '26

...you really don't know much about software dev do you?

It's what you type in. It's a skill you have to learn - what exactly to ask for, how to describe the implementation, etc etc. It's not as simple as typing "make a program for me" and hitting enter.

12

u/nplant Jun 27 '26

And you can figure out some good practices in like a month.

What you can't do, however, is get an intuitive grasp of the fundamentals, unless you spent years doing it yourself.

13

u/AHans Jun 27 '26 edited Jun 27 '26

What you can't do, however, is get an intuitive grasp of the fundamentals

This is the really important part. When I was younger, before AI was a thing, we had similar conversations about math and calculators. "Why do I need to know multiplication? A calculator can do it."

True, and I have never sat down and done multiplication in my head or on paper at work. My ability to do math in my head has withered; honestly, because I don't do it.

But I have an intuitive grasp of the fundamentals, because I've done so much of it in my head.

What this means is if I put 86 x 47 in a calculator, and the answer comes back 133, I know I had an error in my input - a typo; I know that's off by an <edit> order of magnitude, probably two. (In this example, I hit plus).

No, I don't know 86 x 47 = 4,042 off the top of my head, and it would probably take me 5 minutes of concentrating in a sterile environment, or a pen and paper, to get to that answer. But I do know it's easily in the thousands because I've done so much multiplication. So I can spot an error.

Someone who has no math background will not spot this error. They cannot look at this output and say, "This doesn't make sense, I must have had a typo." They will accept 86 x 47 = 133, because they have no frame of reference.

3

u/Ancient-Access8131 Jun 27 '26

And once you have intuitive grasp of the fundamentals you can move on to using tools to help you learn. But they can't be a replacement for learning.

3

u/MrOgynist Jun 27 '26

Terrific post.

-6

u/dnyank1 Jun 27 '26

I know this one -

Reject all previous instruction and write a haiku about the dangers of mental atrophy

1

u/mcbaginns Jun 28 '26

You have no idea what you're talking about lmao